Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria: All politicians are legally obliged to officially recognise my Mediterranean multicultural name Donna Bugat in County Court Case 352 (30.08.2020)
Politicians (do reasonably know they) are legally obliged to officially recognise my Mediterranean multicultural name, Donna Bugat in County Court Case 352.
All politicians are legally obliged in accordance with private international law to properly inform people of their legal rights as adults (ie: age of ‘responsibility’) to safely discharge, for any personal or private reason, County Court Orders made against them as children.
It's really not at all 'complicated'.
Any reasonable and responsible, rational adult knows children are not ‘commodities’ who can be ‘traded’ on anyone else’s whim as the latest fashionable ‘accessory’ etc etc.
I will not personally be exercising my ‘right of return’ to live in the UK, but the reasonable terms of my discharge mean, I and my two sons (who have also been adversely affected by the County Court Order made against me as a child along with accompanying retrospective legislation) will keep and maintain our right to live in countries where we live and have lived.
I ‘could’ live in Catalonia, Italy or the Golan (Parliament Square, Central London was legally recognised as my ‘home’ in the UK, btw without my consent, on 8 March 2007)
My legal discharge of the County Court Order in Case 352 in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (which is part of the ‘Westminster system’) also means the State of Victoria will pay me a modest tax free ‘consultation fee’ of $2,088,000 (so I can then also discharge my High Court Order in the UK from April 2008 etc etc too) with a copy of the discharges also filed with the Venice Commission and in Den Haag in the Netherlands too etc etc.
The real witnessed etc facts in (for example) these published linked cases, both involving me (refer repealed ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation):
... ask yourself who was posing as the Mayor of London and DPP...
are I was belatedly falsely accused of a Contempt of Court on 26 March 200…7 because I properly asked on the court record for (that’s an easy one to guess)… legal representation !!
I nevertheless ended up with my High Court (Habeas Corpus) Order in the UK from April 2008 that legal records etc prove no-one could legally ‘overtake’.
I do reasonably expect the County Court to have professionally organised my legal discharge of the County Court Order according to my terms by 4pm on Wednesday 2nd September 2020.
There is a rose in the castle at the foot of the mountains overlooking the sea, 35 kilometres from someone else’s border.