Donna Black-cat: ‘Press Release’: it is absolutely lawful to a) advertise and b) have a peaceful ‘political coup’ in UK to hold ‘Cancel Out’ referendum for a 1-1 draw that would really be a ‘win-win’ for everyone (06.05.2019)
... it is impossible to deny british politicians on all 'sides' conducted a horrendously violent 'political coup' against brian and myself...
My name is Donna Bugat (formerly known as Babs Tucker) and I am a political exile from the UK, living in the EU, who has no access to legal representation and therefore courts, so I reasonably do not recognize British politicians or their EU referendum which I could never challenge in any court.
Therefore I am and would be legally entitled/it is absolutely lawful to a) advertise and b) have a peaceful ‘political coup’ in UK to hold a ‘Cancel Out’ referendum, for a 1-1 draw that would really be a ‘win-win’ for everyone.
(There was a legal and peaceful ‘Sack Parliament’ demo many years ago in Parliament Square, Central London.
It is impossible to deny, the British politicians on all 'sides' conducted a violent 'political coup' against Brian and myself)
A peaceful demo can result in a peaceful 'political coup'.
The British Establishment ‘traditionally’ say the rule of law exists, except when it doesn’t suit them.
The British politicians EU referendum (changing the goalposts) is continuing with the mantra of rich people can buy any passport they like (which was the PM TM’s main focus as Home Secretary) while trying to stop what is really a natural human process of ‘dual’ nationality for other/poorer people.
In fact, the Jewish State came into existence precisely because all governments, including the British government, failed to protect Jewish people from the Holocaust, which was clearly foreseeable following the Albigensian Crusade and Spanish Inquisition etc over so many centuries.
So the British EU referendum which ‘selectively’ opposes some dual citizenship cannot possibly be lawful.
In practice, a Jewish State was legally established, relying upon self-defense, with citizenship, that was never contingent on and contrary to all the spin, really did not in any way rely on the Balfour Declaration.
The ‘technical’ way to hold a peaceful ‘political coup’ seems to be a group of people get together to choose a colour they like and then they ask politicians to resign and sometimes the politicians do.
A ‘political coup’ in the UK, would specifically invite the current PM, TM and Leader of the so called Opposition Corbyn to both resign. The politicians do not have a (legally) workable referendum ‘plan’ so many politicians may actually be pleased to see a peaceful ‘political coup’ and ‘New Start’ general election.
I remember how the Lib Dems lied to the students in 2010, which led to demos, while I was still in Parliament Square, that very nearly caused what would have been a peaceful 'political coup' while the City of London continued to collect it's annual Thatcher's £8 billion rebate.
A peaceful ‘political coup’ would need help from people willing to design, print and hand out leaflets across the UK.
It would be very important that politicians and political coup participants were not in any way harmed.
Once the leaders of the two main political parties had resigned, the peaceful ‘political coup’ could formally suspend (prorogue) the British Parliament to hold the ‘Cancel Out’ referendum.
It is actually entirely legal for anyone to hold a referendum including without politicians ‘permission’ anyway, because a referendum is not legally binding.
There should be no more than one month between a peaceful ‘political coup’ and the holding of the ’Cancel Out’ referendum.
An ideal ‘Cancel Out’ referendum should be engaging and entertaining with creative public space and opportunities for everyone to peacefully participate in their own way across the UK.
The ‘Cancel Out’ referendum would be followed by a ‘New Start’ general election that would be open to and encourage the public to stand as MP’s too.
The ‘New Start’ general election would be held several months after the ‘Cancel Out’ referendum, so members of the public who had not stood as MP’s before had sufficient time to organise participating.
The politicians decision making over their own referendum has shown the very real need for a new generation of caring and enthusiastic people in politics more generally.
(I would not be standing for election and would in no way financially profit from the ‘political coup’ because I:
a) am claiming a pension on medical grounds (incl. to ‘self-insure’) from the Australian government in lieu of a civil jury and my lawsuits in UK (there really needs to be a ‘landmark’ pan-EU and universal legal ruling to end the Guantanamo/‘no-man’s land’ of torture for Catalan ‘Area 51’ children and exiles from the Franco era)
(Brian should have had access to a pension on medical grounds because he was horribly abused too)
b) wish to remain retired living on the pink granite coast in Breizh, France on the EU continent)
A ‘political coup' might possibly ‘pardon’ Assange in the UK over the Wiki ’leaks’ spin, meaning he could not be extradited to the U.S, all of which only serves as a distraction anyway by all the politicians and media.
It was Lord ‘void ab initio’ Blair, the top cop in the UK, who along with the BBC originally illegally ‘leaked’ my name in 2006, without my consent, knowing I was the one with a civil jury lawsuit, while never correcting their facts, that I was tortured and exiled over (I was exiled because politicians and media did not comply with my High Court Order over my 'bail' case) which is a real legal 'no-man’s land'/legal vacuum.
(It is well known I made a lawful citizen's arrest of Mayor of London Livingstone in April 2008, that was covered up, I guess because it was in one sense, our 'political coup' alright, because we were trying to stop the dramatically escalating state violence being used on us, that I also won the High Court Order over, that politicians actually profited from by horse-trading among themselves)
The legal effect of the ‘landmark’ ruling in the UK in the recent Assange ‘bail’ case he notably did not appeal (& went to the Crown Court who declined to go beyond one years imprisonment which is presumably what he would have received in the Sweden cases)) confirms state and media agencies do not have ’superior’ rights/entitlements to ’spy’ etc on civilians without their consent, including while using undercover agents.
The British Establishment (for example) authorised and therefore haven’t imprisoned any undercover police officers in the UK, for sexual relationships with women, without their consent.
Tony ‘Baldrick’ Robinson would be appointed to take-over as temporary DG of the BBC state broadcaster for the ‘Cancel Out’ referendum and ‘New Start’ general election.
His remit would be to focus on reporting a full range of public views and interviews with members of the public from all walks of life. The public don’t generally hear any other views other than those of politicians or media barons.
The ‘political coup’ would open dialogue and negotiations with Catalan and Gibraltarian politicians and others to reach a ‘final status’ agreement over Gibraltar so it cannot be forced to leave/withdraw from the EU, if the UK/Spain leaves the EU for any reason.