CAMERON & CORBYN NATO WAR 'PLAN' ORDERS TURKEY TO SHOOT DOWN RUSSIAN JET IN SYRIA, TO TRY & MAINTAIN LEVERAGE AGAINST SYRIAN ARMY GROUND ADVANCES (25.11.2015)
It would be curious for Turkey to supposedly give ten warnings and then make a decision to shoot down a Russian jet in Turkey, all in the space of seventeen seconds, not least since there is no secret about Russia being in Syria etc etc etc.
The shooting down of the Russian jet was more likely to have been a deliberate act in an undeclared war, that happened in Syria, which is really about the advances the Syrian army are making on the ground, as NATO desperately tries to protect it’s many monikered mercenaries.
latakia ...it is the...syrian army, nato wants to stop
The true purpose behind the downing of the Russian jet is about NATO trying to maintain leverage in terms of trying to limit where the...Syrian army can operate on the ground, against the many monikered terrorist armies.
The Daily Mail war propaganda makes it very clear that the purpose behind the shooting down of the Russian jet is to help Cameron with his NATO war plan which requires 'identifying' who can get away with what, for public consumption.
25.11.2015 DAILY MAIL: WORLD LEADERS SCRAMBLE TO DEFUSE MONSTROUS NEW CRISIS OVER DOWNED RUSSIAN JET
The real 'question' that has never been properly answered has always been who is trying to limit the Syrian army on the ground and why ?
The British public who are most susceptible to NATO war propaganda because they believe everything Lord Rothermere's Daily Mail tells them, are not happy about the Russian jet being shot down by Turkey, which indicates the difficulties NATO will face with it's 'identify the enemy' war propaganda.
...most civilians have always supported President Assad too
NATO could only be planning how to try and attack the Syrian army.
"...The identity of the ground troops, and the likelihood that much of the territory would be seized either by President Bashar al-Assad’s army or different warring armies, is probably the biggest single stumbling block to David Cameron securing a Commons majority..."
It is arguable that no-one is sneakier than the long colonial British Parliament in trying to not leave their own fingerprints on their dirty deeds.
It was Roland Dumas who publicly stated the British were behind 'fomenting' what became the US-led war on Syria, which the British Parliament have not refuted.
In truth, the insurmountable 'obstacle' for the US-led war on Syria, in their 'theatre of war' is the reality that the Syrian government have lawfully always protected all the major cities in western Syria where most civilians have always lived.
It is difficult to see how the US-led coalition can change that reality.
"...Demirtas [HDP] at an election rally in Mardin [Turkey] on June 3rd 2015 (about 35km from the Syrian border) dishonestly saying:
“Except for the Rojava region, almost nowhere in Syria can [people with] different beliefs, sects and identities live together. Arabs, Turkmens, Kurds, Shias, Sunnis can no longer live together in Aleppo, Damascus, Lattakia, Hama, Homs; [basically] nowhere.
They have been turned into enemies. They can no longer live in the city, let alone the same neighbourhood, and they are growing increasingly incapable of living in the same country. So, people have been turned into enemies because of their mother tongues, ethnic identities.”
...the far from revolutionary 'rojavan' elysee kurds have long been exposed as nothing more than nato mercenaries
30.05.2013 CEM ERTUR: THE ROLE OF TURKEY IN THE US-NATO-ISRAELI WAR ON SYRIA
“Three Kurdish states may come into being: A Kurdish state in Iran, a Kurdish state in Iraq, a Kurdish state in Syria.
Now it is certain that there will be an 'autonomous' region in Syria just like the one in Iraq. Of course, if the Kurdish entity in Syria incorporates Lattakia as well, a big problem for the Kurds would have been resolved. [Then] they would have access to the sea and a total dependence on Turkey would come to an end. [...] The Kurds are Turkey’s luck. There is a Kurdish buffer [separating Turkey from both Syria and Iraq] . If the central administration in Iraq persists in its current mentality, then the Kurdish state in Iraq may come into being as a fully independent [entity] .”
[co-chair of the Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) Selahattin Demirtaş, interview with Haberturk newspaper, 23 May 2013]
The public statements of Demirtas on May 23rd 2013 and June 3rd 2015, taken together, very disturbingly amounted to a call to deliberately commit Genocide in Syria, in concert with the Turkish regime for the benefit of the Turkish regime and Kurds.
All 'political' sides in Britain have long had their beady eyes focused on militarily imposing their own government in Syria, with Stake-knife Corbyn identified as an anti-Syrian government propagandist as far back as May 2004, while the UK was also waging it's Genocidal war in Iraq.
...kurdish 'political' leaders run the very dirty black market trade in oil for weapons etc
Cameron and Corbyn are a double act who are as guilty as each other because they know, as indeed do the entire British Parliament, that there are no legal grounds to even have any vote to invade Syria, without the permission of the...Syrian government.
Both Cameron and Corbyn very clearly have vested interests in the US-led War on Syria.
Blair is still very much a part of the Labour Party through the unelected Lord Falconer who Corbyn appointed as his shadowy Justice Minister.
The US-led war on Syria is not just saying Assad must go, but rather that anyone who stands against colonialism must not be 'allowed' to stand in 'elections'.
In practical (very far from legal) terms, the British Parliament are trying to repeat what they have done in Iraq in Syria, to try and make it all appear legal, because the most they will ever offer is an apology anyway.
The US & UK illegally imposed a 'sectarian' constitution on Iraq, that gave Kurdish 'political' leaders special rights over and above others, which they want to repeat in Syria.
In reality the British Parliament can only wage war by illegally using state violence on law abiding civilians to try and stop legal challenges in...courts of law.
It is not known if the Russian government have lodged a complaint with the UN etc about the downing of their jet.
Of course the rather brutal reality is the entirely two-faced UNSC weapons supply line stab all civilian populations in the back for financial interests.
Civilians in Iraq, Libya and Yemen have reason to complain Russia's abstentions at the UNSC stabbed them in the back, because an abstention when a veto is possible, is as good as complicity in...Genocide.
Indeed the Russian arrivistes belated grandstanding in Syria ignores many civilians over the years in Syria were effectively abandoned by Russia who always knew that unprecedented US-led terrorist armies were being sent against Syrian...civilians.
This is impossible to entirely ascribe to a policy of appeasement by Russia, since there is no reason for the UN not doing something constructive like making it mandatory for all countries to join the ICC to try and strengthen the rule of law, rather than the lucrative UNSC weapons supply line.
The five permanent members of the UNSC have no functioning legal mechanisms of any kind.
Given that one primary underlying purpose of the US-led war on Syria, is to artificially inflate the price of oil, it is impossible to know what the two-faced UNSC weapons supply line, which is about artificially dividing and ruling civilian populations, may really have agreed behind closed doors.
...the intention is to 'replace' iraq and syria with one 'kurdistan' [guardian 25.11.2015]
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.