BRITAIN & TURKEY BACKED MERCENARY-TERRORISTS COMMIT NEW CIVILIAN MASSACRE IN IDLEB (11.06.2015)
The following is evidence that the British Prime Minister has significantly not put on the Parliamentary record any facts/evidence or indeed any agreement with Turkey, let alone that would have any legal grounds, that has been 'debated' by the British regime over 'training' terrorists in Turkey to illegally try and overthrow the Syrian government.
It is clear from what was said in Prime Minister's Questions that the British regime know they face the insurmountable legal hurdle that training mercenary terrorists in Turkey is no different from their own troops invading Syria to illegally overthrow the Syrian government, which is what they really want to do.
the last thing the british and turkish terror regimes want is anyone combating their isis/al-nusra/fsa terrorists
It is a little odd that the Turkish regime and their propagandists should be taking such a keen interest in the weekly British Prime Minister's Question Time, which is typically known as an assortment of dross.
Of course everyone knows that the British and Turkish regimes are doing anything but trying to 'combat' ISIS which is one the many monikers their own mercenary terrorists fly under.
"British Prime Minister David Cameron spoke on Wednesday about cooperating with Turkey to combat thr Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) in Syria and Iraq.
Cameron was questioned about this week's G7 meeting in Germany during weekly Prime Minister's Questions in parliament when he mentioned "conversations in recent days with the Turkish president" over coordinating the response to the militant group.
The premier told lawmakers that "working with regional partners to make sure everyone has a coordinated approach is the right thing to do".
Turkey signed an agreement with the U.S. in February to train and equip moderate Syrian opposition forces as part of the U.S.-led coalition's effort to battle ISIS.
"In Syria, there is no greater recruiting sergeant for ISIS than President [Bashar al-] Assad's war against his own people," Cameron said.
On intelligence-sharing to prevent the flow of recruits to ISIS, Cameron added: "Where we need even more cooperation is clearly between countries such as Britain and Turkey, which can sometimes act as a gateway for people joining ISIS. That is where we need to focus our efforts." [on trying to find what would only ever be an illegal way for the EU arm of NATO to join the US & Turkey]
Syria has been gripped by violence since the regime launched a crackdown in response to anti-government protests in March 2011, triggering a civil war in which more than 220,000 people have died"
Dishonestly calling a NATO War on Syria, a 'civil' war will not and does not disguise any criminal responsibility of NATO governments and their news media propagandists.
Crispin Blunt (Reigate) (Con): Islamic State is an enemy of civilisation, which is why it finds a coalition of 60 countries ranged against it. It requires military defeat, and the sooner that task is undertaken, the easier it will be. However, it is not going to happen if the regional powers are not co-ordinating their policies. What discussion was there at the G7 about getting Turkey, Iran and Saudi Arabia, at the very least, to co-ordinate their policies towards Islamic State?
The Prime Minister: My hon. Friend is absolutely right that that sort of co-ordination is required. Some important steps have been taken, not least President Obama’s meeting at Camp David with all the Gulf countries. I have had conversations in recent days with the Turkish President and have visited Turkey to discuss this issue. I am not sure we will be able to achieve the perfection that my hon. Friend requires of getting everyone round the table at the same time in the same way, but certainly working with regional partners to make sure everyone has a co-ordinated approach is the right thing to do.
11.06.2015: all that matters is that all the turkish political parties support the nato war on syria which means they are all willing to slaughter any civilians for money
A truly shocking 'speech' by Demirtas [HDP] on May 23rd 2013 could well end up before the ICC for example the way he is heading, because in legal terms he essentially publicly called for the Genocide of Syrians for his own personal benefit really.
He is another one of these fake 'human rights lawyers', with a ringing endorsement from the likes of the 'Economist'.
NATO 'politicians' really all are the biggest creeps.
The Turkish 'elections' have been about trying to give the 'political' leadership of Kurds a higher 'mainstream' profile in the NATO War on Syria, to try and disguise they have very clearly done the dirty deal to murder Syrian civilians for NATO, which is anything but about any 'Independence'.
The British regime unsurprisingly want a coalition between the AKP and HDP.
Idleb, SANA- Terrorists of “Jabhat al-Nusra” and “Islamic Ahrar al-Sham Movement” organizations perpetrated Wednesday night a massacre against locals of Qalb Lawze village in Idleb Province countryside, killing at least 30 citizens.
Local sources told SANA that tens of terrorists of both Takfiri terrorist organizations, affiliated to Al-Saud and Erdogan regimes, attacked the village, killing 30 people including five members of one family, looting and burning tens of houses.
The victims included three religious men and two women, the sources added, pointing out that terrorists intended to kill some locals by slaughtering after closing ways to the village, which is located at Summaq Mountain, to prevent any aid from reaching the locals who managed to kill five terrorists.
Al-Nusra and other terrorist groups, affiliated to Erdogan regime, perpetrated many massacres against locals of Idleb province, the latest was when those terrorists perpetrated last month the worst massacre against the local of Ishtabraq village in the countryside of Jisr al-Shoghour where 200 civilians were killed most of them women and children.
criminal nato war propaganda of divide and rule
People will have noticed that the NATO War on Syria propaganda is recently currently primarily focused around three themes:
a) trying to pretend that not all NATO's terrorists in Syria are terrorists, when they are terrorists whatever moniker they fly under on any given day to try and illegally overthrow the Syrian government.
Only late last night the war mongering Guardian (for example) were cynically trying to portray their Al-Qaeda poster boy Abu Qatada as not so bad.
This is only about criminally trying to suggest that makes the FSA and al-Nusra et al squeaky clean, which is all very far from truth and civilian society's rule of law.
b) very definitely planning a false flag terror attack
The NATO terrorists are very clearly threatening a terror attack.
It is important to remember that it is the Australian Foreign Minister, Ms Bishop and Australian intelligence services who were given the job of spreading this NATO threat.
c) trying to find some way that the EU arm of NATO can join the US & Turkey in an invasion of Syria which is what is behind the 'training' ruse.
Obviously there is no legal difference between 'training' terrorists and invading Syria themselves, which the US and Turkish regimes have already obviously crossed the red line and are overtly doing already.
Not forgetting of course, the nasty Little Englander EU referendum 'kings of the world' colonial propaganda.
the 'kings of the world' far from common-'wealth' slaughter, criminal mentality, is not welcomed by any indigenous civilians anywhere little englander has been.
little englander who bends over for the unelected HRH...Saxe Coburg, really is so incredibly ignorant and racist about...everything...
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.