Donna: My Court Order for global health plan in Case 352 in County Court of Victoria, rights historical wrong of s44 Australian Constitution’s ‘One country, Two systems’... in Australia (24.05.2020)
I am an Australian citizen, who is also a dual national, born in Australia during the Whites Only & Franco era, that in treating Australian citizens differently in Australia (and elsewhere) is really only ‘one country, two systems’.
The Australian Parliament of ‘both houses’ et al intended to recklessly use s44 of the Australian Constitution to arbitrarily change… children’s true identities, including our names, religions and nationalities through the courts, while isolating us from all our family, purely based on the whim of any adult, while unlike adults, we had no legal representation.
There is therefore, no legal argument in any court that can stop s44 of the Australian Constitution being overturned in the County Court of Victoria in Case 352 to right a historical wrong so that people who are Australian citizens, can also regain and maintain including multiple dual nationalities they were born with or acquired, including through marriage, while also having the right to stand in politics in Australia as dual nationals too.
Australian politicians and their courts who forcibly disassociated children from our entire identities in a massive ‘social experiment’ in creating ‘designer children’ and universal child soldiers makes MKUltra look like a walk in the park by comparison.
It is a legal impossibility and clearly disproportionate to blame child victims, and worse when it was never intended that we should ever even know the truth about so much that is taken for granted by most people. The traditional divide and rule of nationalism is more profitable for politicians and a few transnational corporations, who marginalise the competing natural evolution of dual nationals.
It is s44 of the Australian Constitution that is really illegitimate because it has no legitimate aim that is convincingly established in either politics or criminal or civil law.
The Australian Parliament ‘put in place a sequence of events that only sought to repeatedly cause me harm as a child and adult that eventually saw politicians and media publicly vilify me as a ’national disgrace’ in the UK , while hiding s44 of the Australian Constitution was originally their universal disgrace too, (all Australian citizens were also British subjects until 1949) that continued escalating with British and EU politicians referendum, while I was living in France.
The fact I always refused to join the military or intelligence services wasn’t about my being opposed to those organisations per se, but was because I have always been legally entitled to my true identity, first, to try and find my own way in life.
Of course people with multicultural Catalan heritage have historically been betrayed by all ’sides’ because of the shift from the Mediterranean to the global colonial world.
The British-Sino Treaty ostensibly over Hong Kong saw the same Judiciary in our ‘landmark’ cases in the UK involving the latest British PM (who was Mayor of London) and Leader of the Opposition (who was the DPP and Head of the pseudo ‘human rights’ Doughty Chambers and their Special Counsel from Hong Kong) ‘retire’ to become part of the British-Sino Judiciary in Hong Kong. The people who posed as my parents from the highest echelons of the British and Australian intelligence circles were married in the Hong Kong Cathedral. The British Sino ‘One Country-Two systems’ Treaty, was concocted in 1984 when the man who posed as my godfather was also Director General of ASIO when he failed to declare his conflict of interest when he legislated behind my back and without my knowledge… in Australia too. There is no doubt whatsoever, the current British PM and Leader of the Opposition in the UK would be 'professionally embarrassed' if I was a politician in Australia.
The British (Commonwealth) along with the Chinese government, European Union, and arguably the United States with it’s electoral college, all actually have similar systems because the… cronyism of the highest echelons have never been elected by a public vote.
It is self evident the British and Australian governments are legally liable in my lawsuits, so they are legally responsible for any financial costs regarding my standing in Australian politics too, as a dual national, with my own identity, which I have properly instructed I want to do, along with ensuring I have my own choice of medical treatment.
It is a legal impossibility to legally prevent me from standing in the by-election in the Garden of Eden Monaro because politicians have not legally settled my lawsuits (which I obviously did not seek to accumulate in the first place) in a timely manner.
The fact I am an Australian citizen who is resident and a dual national who can legally stand for election in Australian politics, peacefully changes the long standing hypocrisy of Australia’s own ‘one country, two systems’, which could also help and encourage other governments to constructively reform in the longer term.
I am notifying of my standing as Australian Citizen ‘D’ in the Garden of Eden Monaro by election because the central substantive legal issue is the long overdue reform of s44 of the Australian Constitution to benefit all Australians.
The royalist media tycoon and papal knight Murdoch who is a global hacker, preying on defenceless children and women, has along with his family, never been seen on any front line of any kind promoting freedom of speech and democracy along with the rule of law. He didn’t even call for the Australian military to support firefighters to try and protect Australian citizens lives in the recent bushfires.
He has always promoted nationalist isolationist propaganda as an unscrupulous way to stop competition from the freedom of movement of civilians, while he flits around on his personal jet and yachts to prop up his own transnational corporations.
Murdoch et al have never been bothered by ‘one country two systems’ … in Australia, and the reason he doesn’t stand in politics himself supporting a level playing field of equality of… opportunity is because he only wants the very easy life of lazily making money spinning divide and rule.
He used the entire state apparatus and then had to call for reinforcements from Lynton Crosby et al, when he was doing his best to Thomas Bowlby me in the UK, by re-inventing my life with the purported ‘crimes’ of having the ‘wrong’ identity as a child and being a (working) Mum as an adult on Mother’s Day.
The Australian born American citizen Murdoch who only has a hobby farm in Eden Monaro because he has always horse-traded over s44 of the Australian Constitution to build his global empire, could have easily funded any financial recovery from the recent bushfires in Victoria and New South Wales, out of his own wallet.
It is common-sense the fact anyone has dual nationality is not of itself a crime or evidence of improper foreign influence in or outside politics.
The reality is Australia cannot truly recover from bushfires or a global pandemic and become a healthy and wealthy genuinely prosperous country, until s44 of the Australian Constitution is overturned so all Australian citizens can participate in all levels of decision making processes, including politics, and most importantly legislating (legislation like Constitutions must be justiciable) which will in turn help to strengthen the peace and harmony of the rule of law.
There is an accompanying War of Succession over what calls itself the ’news’ media because that would have to fundamentally change in the absence of the traditional overarching divide and rule of s44 of the Australian Constitution, which corrupts all politics with cronyism.
The current Premier in Victoria is typically only trying to save his own job, by hiding behind s44 of the Australian Constitution, and the ubiquitous decoy of a royal commission, during his recent foray into the ’Eurasian bridge’ Belt and Road agreement with China. That agreement isn't legally binding, because Australian politicians do know it is absolutely unlawful for Victorian politicians to stop the equality of... opportunity, for all… Australian citizens to stand in politics… in Australia which would really benefit individual and national lives along with the economy in Australia in the here and now.
The Australian politicians are missing the opportunity for massive growth in technology and tourism in our strategically placed country, that would benefit from having eco friendly silicon valley satellite cities around the coastal areas in Australia, which is in the populous Asia Pacific region.
I am willing to give legal immunity to politicians et al and forego personal financial compensation from my lawsuits, if politicians reform the national health and welfare system in Australia by maintaining the recent upgrade of Jobseekers Allowance (which was also frozen in 1984 and not properly updated by Liberals or Labour since then) to $2200 per month, which would also help stop people getting ill. That would assist all Australians, and indeed help increase wages in Australia during the transition to clean renewable energy, and should be payable to Australian citizens living anywhere. (I subsisted on €100 euros for... six months in France in the only real home of my own I have ever known, which meant I got very serious scurvy, because that is substantially lower than the poverty level of below 943 euros... per month, or even extreme poverty which is considered less than 640 euros... per month, while I also had no electricity during the winter, all because of the cronyism of politics.) The Australian Parliament are also legally obliged to pay any excess on my choice of my own global 24/7 fully comprehensive annual medical and insurance policy that comes with legal representation (where the evidence is, we all know I do try and keep my medical costs low).
Donna: My Health Plan (20.05.2020)
... my whole self is my best self...
Dear Specialist Clinics & MRI Department et al,
My real name is actually Donna Bugat (not Barbara Tucker)
I am currently engaged in legal proceedings in Australia to overturn a Court Order which was made against me as a child in Case 352 in the County Court of Victoria from 28 May 1963 when my true identity was forcibly changed, by s44 of the Australian Constitution because of my mixed race Mediterranean cultural heritage, during Whites Only Australia and the Franco era.
The governments belatedly refer to this as ‘forced adoptions’ which is not a recognized legal concept by the courts, and my baptism certificate etc confirms that very unfortunately for me, the highest echelons of the British and Australian intelligence services posed as my parents and godparents.
There is no space in my own ‘Window of Tolerance’ in the here and now for the endless politically motivated discrimination of s44 of the Australian Constitution which has caused me prolonged serious physical and emotional harm since I was a small child, and my identity was forcibly changed, through the courts.
The only legal political settlement possible is s44 of the Australian Constitution which is what is really illegitimate, being abolished by my Court Order, because it is not legally, morally or politically sustainable. Dual nationality is not of itself evidence of a crime or improper influence, foreign or otherwise. There would then be a level playing field with the… opportunity to stand in politics.
... the 'crime' of being a mum on mothers day in the uk...
It is incredibly difficult to be simultaneously disenfranchised by forcibly having your true identity and cultural heritage stolen as a child, while also not facing a level playing field in an undemocratic adult political world, that further arbitrarily excludes you from fully participating in political decision making that affects your own life.
There is after all, no legal impediment stopping the British monarchy standing in political elections so the Medieval Inquisition of s44 of the Australian Constitution is truly anomalous. A reasonable and rational responsible adult would know, I should not need the ‘permission’ of politicians and courts in Australia, to have my true identity, or to choose to be Jewish, and stand as a politician too. The Jewish State was founded on reasonable self defence that was not legally contingent on British colonialism or Zionism, while there are questions that remain unanswered over the true intentions of governments at the San Remo Conference in 1920.
My own family are and have been historically, Jewish, Catholic and Muslim. The fact the Jewish State intends to declare sovereignty over part of Judea and Samaria, presumably also means Palestinian political leaders own Palestinian State will finally fully exist in the here and now, giving people an actual choice of where they want to live. I would for example have no problem myself living as a Jewish person in the Golan Heights, regardless of whether it is within Israeli or Syrian jurisdiction, because Jewish people must be able to live in other countries across the Middle East, just like many Muslim people are able to live in Europe.
I have suffered from substantial PTSD since I was a small child, but I do nevertheless have a reasonable and well founded belief I do not have and will not have access to my choice of proper medical treatment generally which should be my legal right, or be able to fully recover from PTSD, which also impacts adversely on my health, until the stressful legal case over my true identity, which involves my own children too, is legally settled and s44 of the Australian Constitution, which still exists in the here and now, is abolished.
It would be encouraging to have some positive outcomes during a global pandemic if s44 of the Australian Constitution is abolished and there is a sustainable Israeli Palestinian peace deal.
...the 'crime' of being a mum on mothers day...
It is not unreasonable to want to for example stand in the Garden of Eden Monaro by election because other candidates have by contrast been able to stand in political elections throughout their whole adult lives which is something else most people can thankfully take for granted in Australia. It is undemocratic to claim everyone has to vote, while claiming some Australian citizens who have committed no crime, cannot stand for election, simply because they are dual nationals. I would stand as Australian Citizen ‘D’ in a political election because my identity and politics are an irrelevance because the substantive legal issue that needs to be recognised is s44 of the Australian Constitution is ‘void ab initio’ so Australian citizens who also have dual nationality should be able to stand regardless of their politics.
The pseudo science of Bowlby’s ‘clean break theory’ (remarkably published by the WHO in 1952 p.152 Maternal Care) that Bowlby et al never tested on their own children first, was a Medieval Inquisition by adults lacking any legal basis, that wickedly condemned (and I quote) what he considered “deprived children whether in their own homes or out of them… a social infection as real and serious as carriers of diphtheria and typhoid”.
It was incredibly dishonest of the Royal Women’s Hospital to publicly claim that a report they very belatedly commissioned from a social worker from the Catholic University called Professor Shurlee Swain was a legal ‘opinion’ when it was merely an apologia for what was a Medieval Inquisition, without any legal basis.
It is common-sense a responsible child protection policy would make it mandatory for all children removed from their entire family for any reason, to have fully comprehensive medical and insurance cover that comes with legal representation. It was grossly negligent of governments, to deny children the most basic medical information about immediate family members that governments did of course collect for themselves.
In my own case, there were no legal grounds stopping me returning to my married parents and little sister with the same DNA, who did want me. It does seem entirely plausible, that rather than being a heresy, Jesus and Mary Magdalene had children, because there is so much history in Australia of forcibly changing children’s true identities, to suit rich adults.
In the UK, Murdoch (et al) embarked on his grand Inquisition into my ‘crime’ of being a Mum, which originally began when I was unlawfully arrested on Mothers Day, so he could illegally leak my name from New Scotland Yard in the press with his one-sided lies.
Of course, Murdoch et al didn’t want their lies about unlawfully arresting a mum on Mothers Day !! for goodness sakes, ever aired before any High Court…. civil jury by contrast, during the entire time I was a pipsqueak peacenik in Parliament Square, Central London for 7+years, because it beggars belief decent and civilised people would do something so nasty and vicious.
The Australian born American citizen Murdoch only really maliciously targeted me in the UK because he could incur considerable financial losses from s44 of the Australian Constitution, which he leveraged to build his global media empire, being abolished.
... our iconic tents... blatant political policing going on... behind our backs, between politicians and police, involving jones after everyone knew i was the one who won more legal proceedings at southwark crown court in the uk on 8 march...
I most certainly do not need the ‘permission’ of Murdoch (who called my life a legal ’game’ of ‘cat and mouse’ in his Times in London) to be a mum and Jewish.
My ‘crime’ of not having politicians ‘permission’ to be a mum !! in the UK, snowballed into 48 violent unlawful arrests of me in the most incredible cover up in the UK during which I was sadly repeatedly tortured on the mainland UK, and illegally imprisoned twice without legal representation or trial over non-imprisonable alleged ‘offences’.
The top cop at New Scotland Yard Lord Blair was eventually forced to resign, shortly before his boss, the head of the British ACPO Sir Ken Jones who was also involved, ‘emigrated’ to Victoria in Australia to hide away as a Deputy Police Commissioner. Jones tendered what he did know was a perjured witness statement regarding his ‘activities’… in the UK, for the decoy of a different Royal Commission in Victoria in 2019 (when he is really involved in the ‘forced adoptions’ Royal Commission too)
I was endlessly bullied by all political ’sides’ in the UK, which led to my being exiled from the UK, for the ‘crime’ of being a mum who also happened to force the repeal of their legislative equivalent of s44 of the Australian Constitution, which was s132-138 SOCPA 2005.
A serious problem has been the British government’s refusal to hand over the CCTV of the life threatening attack on me in the UK that DFAT in Australia knew about while Jones was the Deputy Commissioner in Victoria police where he also illegally used that public role to access my sealed court records at the DOJ about my County Court case from 28 May 1963, that I didn’t even see for the first time, until late last year.
The man who posed as my godfather was Director General of ASIO in 1984 when he failed to declare his conflict of interest in the legislation about ‘forced adoptions’ that was passed behind my back and without my knowledge in Australia, because the intelligence services who it is now admitted were spying on the Italian and Jewish Community in Carlton where I was born, were involved.
I now realize the life threatening torture in the UK, that was also crushing my abdomen when I could not breathe, is unfortunately more likely than not, the origin of my autoimmune and related illnesses, (I did become increasingly unwell after that and doctors did repeatedly refer me to hospitals in Germany and France too)
Politicians et al have hampered my having access to timely proper medical treatment of my own... choice, while also wilfully obstructing legal proceedings, because they did falsely label my true identity as a ‘crime’ when I was a child, before ridiculously falsely accusing me of the ‘crime’ of being a ‘mum’ as an adult in the UK.
St Vincent’s hospital will need to advise what support they offer people with PTSD who need medical tests etc.
On a personal level, the need to have countless medical tests, while I have serious PTSD that is also directly related to the ‘probable cause’ of the use of life threatening torture etc on me that was crushing my abdomen etc is of itself overwhelming, and does re-traumatize me because of what has happened.
Therefore after careful consideration of the true circumstances at this time, the MRI scan on 21 May 2020 and the corresponding specialist appointment on 1 June 2020 will need to be rescheduled again. The last time I saw a GP on 9 January 2020 to collect repeat prescriptions (and they referred me to another specialist for a complication of rheumatoid arthritis) they also said there was a problem with my kidneys (not related to my having an ectopic kidney) that would need further tests, although they did not explain by whom etc. I am also confused why I was sent a home testing kit for cancer, by the government, because my understanding is the hospital did a cancer test that came back negative.
I would also like to explore trying CBD oil but without any THC because I don’t like psychoactive medication for the obvious mind altering reasons (I am not a fan of MKUltra) because I do need to try and reduce both the medical costs and serious risks associated with my now longstanding and worsening ill health because I do not have, through no fault of my own, any private health cover, or any medication for pain relief because of the other prescriptions I take.
It is also important to me to try and avoid a… medical operation and the very real additional and serious risks that go with that, that obviously results from a lifelong … political operation that was ridiculously waged against me in the UK and Australia.
Donna: My Instruction for Registrar in County Court of Victoria re: Case 352 & RU1213XXX (21.05.2020)
Australian Citizen ‘D’: The Garden of Eden-Monaro is Suez that can bring the Walls of Jericho of s44 of the unAustralian Constitution down (15.05.2020)
... Australian Citizen 'D'...
I am an Australian citizen with an Australian birth certificate and passport who is resident in Australia, so my name and bio and dual nationality are legally an irrelevance, because it is only the discrimination of s44 of the Australian Constitution that falsely claims I cannot stand for election which is absolutely unlawful.
I cannot pretend Australia is any kind of a democracy with the unlawful discrimination of s44 of the Australian Constitution.
I am an abolitionist and reformist who says the political slavery of s44 of the Australian Constitution must end so everyone can build a genuine democracy.
The purpose of politics is supposed to be to serve not enslave people.
The Walls of Jericho of s44 of the Australian Constitution must fall.
I am standing for election for all Australian citizens so that any Australian citizen will have the same… opportunity to stand face to face with politicians all the time as an elected member of Parliament.
I can’t, don’t and won’t support anyone who doesn’t publicly support Australian citizen’s, who happen to be dual nationals, standing in elections too.
There is no legitimate aim convincingly established in civil or criminal law for s44 of the Australian Constitution which defies the natural world.
... this is where s44 of the australian constitution belongs...
It is also absolutely unlawful to force anyone to vote in Australia when there is the unlawful discrimination of s44 of the Australian Constitution which arbitrarily excludes some Australian citizens from even standing for election, while also then making them subject to any other politically motivated and arbitrary discrimination they cannot stand in politics to change.
The only way to honestly begin rebuilding the Garden of Eden-Monaro so it truly blossoms in the future is by first abolishing s44 of the Australian Constitution so all Australian citizens in Eden Monaro including dual nationals have the real opportunity to genuinely participate in politics as equals.
It is common-sense dual nationality is not of itself a crime and nor is it of itself evidence of improper foreign influence either inside or outside Parliament.
I guess there could be the National and Dual National political parties.
Politicians who have failed in their own legal challenges while relying on a celebrity entourage of faux ‘human rights’ lawyers, all too common in London, should not and cannot stop an Australian Citizen ‘D’ from standing (and indeed should be supporting me) unless they… publicly bring a legal challenge using s44 of the Australian Constitution in a court of law against me, which they have been invited to do and have not done.
Of course the Australian born American citizen Murdoch, who has a hobby farm in Eden-Monaro could actually stand himself if he really believes in a fair go for all Australians.
If it is not Garden of Eden Monaro that rights the historical wrong of s44 of the Australian Constitution it will nevertheless happen.
Australian Citizen ‘D’.
Donna: An abolitionist of the slavery of s44 of the Australian Constitution (15.05.2020)
... my whole self is my best self...
Mr Andrews et al,
I trust it is a priority to peacefully settle my lawsuit in Case 352 in the County Court of Victoria and join me in becoming one of the abolitionists of the slavery of s44 of the Australian Constitution.
My own primary healthcare policy is understandably the abolition of the slavery of s.44 of the Australian Constitution (which was remarkably similar to the politically motivated s132-138 SOCPA 2005 which I repealed in the UK), so I guess being a dual national can give one a wider perspective on politics etc)
(I am sure you agree with me it was quite unfortunate the Victorian Labour government spent taxpayers money hiring the opportunistic Sir Ken Jones, who was co-incidentally Head of ACPO in the UK, at the centre of all the widely publicised, and deeply unpleasant internecine warfare among the politicised top brass in New Scotland Yard, whilst I was a pipsqueak peacenik in Parliament Square, Central London)
I guess it is therefore encouraging there is also a burgeoning new frontier in healthcare with medicinal marijuana, which presumably with far wider testing could possibly bring many health benefits across all strata of society, while considerably reducing healthcare costs overall, particularly with regard to medical operations, which have so many additional risks.
My personal view is too many politicians have become addicted to inflated salaries.
You may contact me in confidence on my mobile phone (the President of the Victorian Law Council has my phone number) when you wish to peacefully settle my lawsuit, although I will regardless, be proceeding with the abolition of s.44 of the Australian Constitution, anyway.