BREXIT LEGALLY OBLIGED TO STOP USING ARTICLE 50 TO ILLEGALLY THREATEN CIVILIANS EUROPEAN UNION CITIZENSHIP -BEFORE- BRUSSELS ‘NEGOTIATION’ (14.05.2017)

Brexit Westminster are legally obliged to confirm Article 50 does not give politicians any power over European Union citizenship or they are going to be in the ECJ -before- any ‘negotiations’ which they know would be based on a completely false premise.

 

... this 'trial by media' which is just being used to lie to try and cause law abiding civilians serious identifiable harm is seriously illegal...

 

This is the same Brexit Westminster who have since September 2009 consistently illegally refused to hand over their torture tapes.

 

David Davis is lying when he uses weasel words to claim it is Barnier he will be arguing with over -British nationals European Union citizenship - that Barnier doesn't give two hoots about, because the real legal argument the British government are having is with British nationals over... European Union citizenship.

 

 

... 'policy department c' [april 2017]... this is -evidence- of brexit and brussels "commissioning" a blue-print for unparalleled deceit...

 

The legal reality is politicians do know it is not the case politicians could invent Article 50 to suddenly give themselves power over European Union citizenship they did not have before.

European Union citizenship is not a case of now you have it and now you don’t.

 

No politician is acting in good faith when their starting point is using Article 50 to illegally threaten civilians over European Union citizenship.

It’s a straightforward matter that either politicians confirm that Article 50 does not give them power over European Union citizenship -before- any Brussels ‘negotiation’ over whatever else they want to waffle on about, or they are in the ECJ who cannot undo their own law.

All reasonable and rational law abiding civilians know it is seriously illegal for politicians to threaten law abiding civilians over their European Union citizenship.

_______________________

 

N.B: This is what calls itself the British 'Justice' system:

 

The evidence is Lord Neuberger was installed as President of the Supreme Court to cover up he illegally denied we peaceniks legal representation in April 2011, which led to the August 17 2011 lawsuit.

 

... we left Lord N & his sidekick in 'full flow' when we walked out of the Court of Appeal in April 2011 and literally cut to the chase proving they were bent when they could not prosecute us for breaching their phoney High Court injunction because then they would have to give us -legal representation- which is what it was really all about stopping...

 

His predecessor Lord Pip was another old rogue who tried but couldn't quite bend the law far enough for Westminster in 2007. He had lied in a 'draft' ruling that he was forced to correct.

 

The Supreme Court are the same fraudsters who suddenly started claiming in 2009 that their address is Parliament Sq, which they obviously did not argue in court because it is a lie.

 

The Supreme Court incredibly don't even actually give a legitimate address for service because they have always lied about their address being Parliament Square:

 

... 16 july 2009... they never argued the 'address' lie in court...

 

... little george and the 'grandeur' of parliament sq... boris 'missed' filing any claim against the supreme court in may 2010 !!...

 

This is Parliament Square in Central London where there have been many government plots of all sorts:

 

... two 'plots'... this is parliament square that the supreme court are not on...

 

In fact the Supreme Court, Westminster Council and then Boris all lied because they covered up the royal scrounger in chief was trying to lay claim:

... the royal scroungers attorney general who is their legal representative was no-where to be seen arguing this in court in 2010 which was put on the High Court record after everyone had illegally failed to disclose the truth ...

 

The 'Two Princes' plot:

 

... the pretender on the throne may well be hiding the two plots the 'two princes' were buried in are in parliament sq...

 

The area of Parliament Square really used to include St. Margaret's church so it wouldn't be surprising if the truth is the Two Princes were buried as commoners in the part that is now Parliament Square.

 

The High Tower:

 

 

... the 'high tower'... i learned through numerous malicious prosecutions brought against us that the houses of parliament which is built on reclaimed swamp say their boundary actually extends across the road as far as the pavement of parliament square...

 

The legal reality today is Parliament Sq. belongs to the people in perpetuity not the Crown.

 

RELATED:

 

14.05.2017 BREXIT & BRUSSELS ‘CASH FOR EUROPEAN UNION CITIZENSHIP’ RACKET TRIES TO HEAD OFF BEING DISARMED BY REAL DEMOCRACY OF PEACE & HARMONY OF RULE OF LAW