THE 'DARK ARTS': CONVERSION 'THEORY' CIRCUMVENTS EUROPEAN UNION ECJ WITH UNITED NATIONS ICJ IN BREXIT 'CASH FOR EUROPEAN UNION CITIZENSHIP' RACKET (12.05.2017)

The latest complete and utter garbage of 'trial by news media' from Brexit Westminster and Verhofdtadt Brussels relies on both completely circumventing the supranational European Court of Justice to 'remarkably' claim the supranational UN International Court of Justice doesn't recognize any civilians rights.

 

The 'third man' Verhofstadt is behaving like the enemy within doing the whole treacherous Blair routine, rather than acting responsibly.

 

... brexit ‘cash for eu citizenship’ racket is essentially the old chestnut of ’conversion’ [which not everyone has agreed to, so politicians are apparently ‘astonishingly’ trying to ‘leapfrog’ the supranational ECJ for the ICJ ]...

 

The politicians just want the whole European Union to be all about them controlling people.

 

Lynton Crosby must be raking in the cash writing the infantile Brexit 'election' script.

 

It's a shame that politicians are so disrespectful towards civilians, but it is what it is.

 

In the great British 'conversion' racket they keep lying and stealing etc using unlawful force, to try and make people 'agree' with them.

 

'Sir' David Verey [who is also CEO @ Sofina with Verhofstadt and the Bilderberg Davignon who was Belgian Foreign Minister when they assassinated Patrice Lumumba] is working with Ian Taylor at Vitol Oil incl. over covering up the con-'artist' Mark Wallinger's 'State Britain' rip off of our Parliament Sq. Peace Campaign etc etc.

 

Verey is a banker and apart from the Tate [like Vitol Oil] and Sofina [and previously the Daily Mail board who are part of the London Evening Standard] is also on a number of British government 'Art' department 'committees' funding all sorts of dirty deals for big oil.

 

The former MI6 Chief John Sawers is now part of the Bilderberg 'Steering Committee' too.

 

Two examples of Westminster trying to use 'conversion' against us [which we never agreed to ] are a) the Tate 'State Britain' rip-off with b) the original campaign property stashed in the Museum of London both which are about illegally preventing us from campaigning while the British government lie pretending they speak 'on behalf' of us.

 

... the brexit 'cash for eu citizenship' racket is very, very serious 'conversion'...

 

What governments call 'conversion' is really them trying to whitewash what they know are their own serious crimes.

 

In fact, last time anyone looked Article 50 could only be interpreted to be compliant with the ECJ.

 

Most people can understand how all the politicians in the European Union would have some considerable difficulty trying to explain how they signed a Treaty to rob European Union citizens of the existing private right of their European Union citizenship via the err...UN International Court of Justice.

 

The premise of the garbage below which really is the worst legal mumbo jumbo I have ever come across [and we have unfortunately come across far too much !!] is that the United Nations ICJ, not the European Union ECJ should determine Article 50.

 

The sum total of this seriously flawed 'interpretation' of anything and everything is that a) politicians claim nobody has any rights whatsoever unless they happen to be at the whim of a politician, and b) btw the politicians bear no legal responsibility whatsoever for inventing Article 50 which led to the entirely foreseeable outcome.

 

It is about as deceitful as it is possible to be, with the politicians in the European Union trying to absolve themselves of all legal responsibility for the Article 50 Enabling Act.

 

The new shameful low below just beggars belief in the old cobblers quotient because it is pulling such an obvious fast one typically trying to replace facts with 'theory' to produce an abuse of process:

 

... 'policy department c'... this 'legal' corporate 'theory' is such a load of old cobblers... that only the Stasi could be proud of it...

 

The policy 'document' which purports to give legal opinions is incredibly describing what could only amount to criminal conversion in the whole 'cash for EU citizenship' racket

 

Everyone knows self-serving politicians don't like facts, let alone a court of law, to get in the way of their 'theory' that they can do whatever they want.

 

The legal reality such theory 'overlooks' is that there are no legal grounds for politicians to lie to try and cause serious identifiable harm to law abiding civilians that was always entirely foreseeable.

 

It is absolutely unlawful to try and punish civilians for the sins of politicians.

 

It's impossible for politicians to even explain why they didn't publish the mumbo jumbo above a very many years ago when they invented the Maastricht Treaty and Treaty of Lisbon.

 

In the Maastricht Treaty politicians were a) acknowledging existing rights, not b) creating new rights, that c) politicians could then remove at a later date.

 

Politicians do not have the 'legal standing' they claim over private rights.

 

The only possible purpose any politician would have in trying to circumvent the ECJ is to try and cut out law abiding civilians who can't go to the ICJ, from of any access to justice anywhere.

 

It is not the case that the UN ICJ has supremacy over the EU ECJ and civilians rights in the European Union.

 

It would be impossible for politicians to suddenly produce a more cynical interpretation of Article 50 out of thin air, than politicians intending to deny those civilians directly affected any access to justice.

 

All rather a give-away that politicians didn't like having to acknowledge in the Maastricht Treaty rights that civilians fought for in the courts, through the real democracy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law.

 

... that would be like appeasing nazi germany... what they really mean is it is impossible for... politicians to explain how article 50 is compliant with eu and ecj law...

 

Article 50 is a spectacular example of the fact politicians may say or write any old garbage down on a piece of paper does not mean it is lawful.

 

The paradox would be Brexit Westminster would agree with Brussels, a sleight of hand to a) give rights to European Union civilians in the UK who would keep their European Union citizenship, while [for example] b) British nationals who remained in the European Union would be illegally denied European Union citizenship, without so much as a peep from British or other politicians across the rest of the European Union.

 

... just beggars belief that anyone could write or publish this...

 

It is the complete opposite of what Barnier claimed because all they are really offering up is a completely lawless divide and rule using Brexit's 'cash for European Union citizenship' racket.

 

The reality is rich people from outside the European Union can buy European Union citizenship politicians are trying to rob from law abiding civilians who already have it, in the European Union.

 

It's garbage above that would insult the intelligence of any decent and civilized law abiding civilian, that makes it abundantly clear precisely why all British nationals who want it should have been given free legal representation over the very serious issue of European Union citizenship a very long time ago.

 

... june 1 2016...brexit vitol oil and their minister for europe 'sir' alan vitol oil duncan wouldn't want to be 'regulated' by the real democracy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law...

 

The politicians are not acting in good faith or behaving at all responsibly because they are corporate lobbyists who just don't care about law abiding civilians.

 

RELATED:

 

06.05.2017 THE 'BUTTERFLY EFFECT': BREXIT 'BALFOUR' VITOL OIL 'CASH FOR EU CITIZENSHIP' RACKET SEES BARNIER CONCEDE LEGAL CERTAINTY & NO RED TAPE

 

04.05.2017 BREXIT 'SIR' ALAN DUNCAN 'CASH FOR EUROPEAN UNION CITIZENSHIP' RACKET 'HIDES' VITOL OIL 'HEAD OFFICE' $270 BILLION ANNUAL 'TURNOVER' IN SWISS 'VAULTS'

 

03.05.2017 THE VITOL OIL CONSPIRACY: WHEN I GOT APRIL 10 2008 HIGH COURT ORDER, BORIS PUT BRIAN CRUTCHES MAY 5 2008, I WAS TORTURED SEPT 4 2009, BORIS COVERED UP IN HIGH COURT “CATASTROPHIC BREAKDOWN IMMUNE SYSTEM” CAUSED BRIAN’S DEATH