THE BREXIT CLUB: WESTMINSTER, WASHINGTON & MOSCOW TRY FASCIST TAKE-OVER EUROPEAN UNION, IRAQI MUQTADA AL-SADR ASKS SYRIAN PRESIDENT ASSAD TO STEP DOWN (11.04.2017)
The Brexit club are always busy selling ‘sides’ that they claim are ‘political’ because that is the only way weapons manufacturers and all that flows from that make money.
There are two new twists on the President Assad must go mantra that went quiet for a while.
The first twist is the G7 foreign ministers et al saying the... Russian government must now make President Assad go [to avoid the 'embarrassment' of Westminster, Washington and Moscow having to admit they have been pals all along ?]
The second one comes from the Iraqi Muqtada al-Sadr who says NATO and Russia must leave Syria and President Assad should resign.
It is unlikely that Muqtada al-Sadr said that without all sorts of consultation.
However, it is by and large not inconsistent with similar positions he had/has in Iraq where he has been at the forefront of trying to do more than his fair share on many fronts for a very many years now.
It should be remembered that both Muqtada al-Sadr and President Assad were born into the difficult positions that they found themselves in.
In the European Union most people don't want a fascist take-over of the European Union by Brexit Westminster, Washington and Moscow either, for reasons that should be obvious from Two World Wars.
It is impossible for Westminster, Washington and Moscow to deny they are working together to try and cause harm to civilians in the European Union.
The whole Brexit and accompanying Team Trump psyop is undeniably all about trying to 'take back control' through the opinion treadmill of the trial by 'news' media war propaganda racket with it's whole 'will of the people' you can 'vote' for anything you like woo.
Muqtada al-Sadr's considerations may have included, is President Assad only looking for and/or able to achieve an accommodation that will just suit Syria/himself because let's not forget how Iraqi people have been used and abused for so long by so many governments to keep the price of oil artificially inflated.
The reality is the long Iraq War 'spilled' over into Syria.
There is a very serious lesson that should be learned from the War on Syria if people want to really get serious about trying to save civilian lives, which should never be dependent on the uncertainty of 'political' elections.
President Assad who had many years of seeing what is going on in Iraq which unlike Syria has been occupied, failed to show real leadership by joining the International Criminal Court, which could have helped put people in Syria out of harms way.
Instead President Assad followed the tired old route of the two faced UN Security Council weapons supply line and their opinion tread mill of trial by media etc etc etc.
There are no ifs, buts and maybe's of any excuses about not joining the International Criminal Court, just because the U.S. and Russian governments lack any responsible leadership so they all too conveniently don't belong etc etc etc.
All governments have armies of lawyers.
President Assad, by having stockpiles of chemical weapons ?? opened the door himself to all sorts of accusations, which always begged the obvious question.
Why on earth would anyone have stockpiles of chemical weapons for any other reason but to use them ?
Unsurprisingly President Assad was duly accused of using chemical weapons in 2013 at which point he handed over what he had.
Nevertheless the ‘chemical weapons’ seed was sown and when it became useful for NATO and Russia to keep pretending they are on opposing ‘sides’ the accusation was wheeled out again in 2017.
... no-one cares about the two-faced 'wallets at dawn' of westminster, washington and moscow et al...
In real terms, chemical weapons were always a deflection from the widespread slaughter by foreign mercenaries of Syrian civilians who refused to join them, that everyone knew President Assad wasn't ever going to go to any court to try and stop.
It was and is however a gruesome deflection that suits both Westminster and Moscow because it hides the War on Syria only happened because neither have any interest in legal challenges over war in courts of law.
It is self evident that foreign mercenaries who have long been slaughtering Syrian civilians because they won't join them are easily capable of all sorts of other deceits.
The murkier reality is just how Westminster, Washington and Russia do collaborate.
... it suits westminster, washington and moscow to say all sorts to try and hide their corporate deals etc long 'hidden' in full view...
President Assad has nevertheless made his choice to live in that ’political’ world of all sorts of ‘will of the people’ woo without any accompanying legal challenges of any kind.
Therefore he won't really be surprised that if there are supposed to be 'choices' in the revolving doors of that ‘political’ world some say he should go for any number of reasons.
That is their 'political' world.
One real question is possibly this.
While President Assad has ‘won’ the long and grinding war at the expense of a great many civilians lives, which is certainly no ‘victory’ of any kind, can he actually conclusively now really end the war with a workable ‘political’ settlement, when he has himself rejected the solution of legal challenges all along ?
What people will surely want to know, is President Assad capable of building a government of re-conciliation [along with him bringing through people in government who are able to one day take-over from him like happens in most ‘political’ parties in the ‘political’ world] ?