MURDOCH’S TEAM TRUMP USE PRETEXT WAR ON SYRIA TO INVOKE “NATIONAL INTEREST”, USE “INTERNATIONAL WATERS” IN THREAT TO MURDER ANYONE WHO OPPOSES THEM (09.04.2017)
Any sentient human being knows the text of a highly unusual unsigned letter Murdoch’s Trump purportedly wrote to members of the U.S. Congress is without any shadow of any doubt, incoherent and irrational [ie: unlawful]
In far from legal terms, it basically uses the pretext of the War on Syria [which has now by and large ended] to claim the U.S. can invoke their own “national interest” to use a trial by media to murder anyone anywhere.
... weasel words over U.S. war crimes.. they are not planning putting before a court of law in the European Union with a signed and dated original...
The missive a) confines itself to [or rather uses the pretext of] Syria before then b) suddenly wildly veering out to enlarge into a wholly undefined threat to the rest of the world invoking "national interest" which any sane adult knows has never been of itself legal grounds to use military force.
The 'political' language 'national interest' like the 'will of the people' woo is legally meaningless.
There is no other government in the European Union who can 'rely' on what the U.S. President has written.
The corporate jobsworth:
... 'represent the world' ?... not in my name ... the supreme cowardice of the global war propaganda racket's 'trial by media' only generates massive profits for global corporations...
It is obviously demonstrably false to claim the U.S. military "represent ...the world".
The key passage where the now established evidence is the Twitter President only conducts trial by media to use the U.S. military is:
"The United States will take additional action as necessary and appropriate to further it's "national interests".
The manner of the text is familiar in the sense governments do use any number of false pretexts to maliciously launch what are really far wider undefined attacks on defenceless civilians wrapped up in weasel words.
What is more unusual is to try and hide behind "national interest" to use any kind of obviously illegal state force.
There is no government in the world who 'reasonably believes' they can declare war by invoking their own "national interest".
The true context of the unconscionable missive is the U.S. have always been trying to find ways to co-opt or murder any defenceless ... civilian outside America who lawfully opposes their military rule.
The U.S. military has in real terms always been slaughtering defenceless civilians in Syria because they refuse to join any number of mercenary brigades.
In legal terms there is no other way to construe the U.S. military actions in Syria.
What the missive also really proves is that the entire U.S. government are war criminals who really don’t care what the U.S. President, who they hide behind, says, so long as he is waging corporate war in their name, anywhere.
The incontrovertible evidence is the U.S et al's military slaughter of defenceless civilians in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya did not stop with their 'change' of government, because all they do is change the pretext/keep 'changing the goalposts'.
The whole bogus War on Terror has always been the false pretext to wage war on defenceless civilians anywhere.
We already know Murdoch's Team Trump & Co snidely singing about “international waters” of all sorts, including 'black sites' is not a tune they would dare argue out loud in any court in the European Union.
The U.S. President's deranged missive which is really only an admission of his willingness to commit and be complicit in war crimes, is in any and all legal terms null and void.
... the whole global war propaganda racket and all that flows from it, laughs all the way to the bank, literally at civilians expense, any which way you look at it...
The rigging of the interconnected media and money markets:
... war profiteers making money out of the whole 'trial by media'...
There's obviously never been any 'bravery' involved in the War on Syria that has really always been attacking defenceless... civilians.
It remains absolutely lawful to refuse to be part of and complicit in the War on Terror which has always only been waging war on defenceless civilians.