BREXIT & TEAM TRUMP SPIN ‘IMMUNITY’ FROM PEACENIKS LONDON LAWSUIT AGAINST TRIUMVIRATE OF POLITICS, INTEL & JOURNALISM ON JUNE 23RD 2010 ? (02.04.2017)
I found myself in the eye of an unusual storm because of our lawfully campaigning 24/7 for years with the peace and harmony of the rule of law.
All war propaganda which is a crime because it knowingly intends to cause serious identifiable harm to defenceless civilians is all about anyone but civilians ‘leaking’ anywhere but in a court of law.
... 'two veterans'... brian and i were unbelievably maliciously prosecuted for being a 'royal eyesore' in an unusual 'test case' that backfired in all sorts of ways...
On June 21st 2010 a High Court judge in London memorably ran, after I was unmoved by him threatening me with the old chestnut of ‘Contempt of Court’ while I was in my own ‘defence’ on the witness stand, lawfully trying to ‘blow the whistle’ on the interconnected lies of politics, intel agencies and journalism.
The thing is I behaved with total honesty in a completely responsible manner as an adult in a court of law.
In contrast the various ‘state agencies’ in the High Court who would have reasonably known what was coming given what had been going on for a long time, spectacularly went into meltdown all around me.
I was standing on the witness stand so I had a clear view of what people did, including [for example] the bent line of lawyers, several rows back, standing in almost unison to try and help the equally bent ‘Judge’ try and shut me down.
Brian wryly commented afterwards that I had definitely set a new record in the time it took a corrupt ‘Judge’ to run and in particular in the High Court.
What is in sharp focus when one puts to one side the array of particularly unsavoury details that sadly did involve torture [over which there is no 'statute of limitations'] is what became the most profound legal challenge of our times.
The entire state apparatus of Westminster was trying to illegally deny an entirely law abiding civilian they had taken to court !! the most basic right of any opportunity to a) mount their own defence in the High Court b) ‘blowing the whistle’ on politics, intel agencies and journalism who had picked the argument.
THE 'TEST' CASE
It is the most explicit legal case in the War on Terror of the entire apparatus of the state lining up it’s war propaganda from politics, intel agencies and journalism against ‘two veteran’ peaceniks.
There were 'journalists' and 'spooks' fraudulently posing as 'activists' given 'immunity' to bring the malicious prosecution against Brian and I.
It was a truly appalling 'test case' of all sorts that badly backfired on them.
In real world and evidential terms it was impossible for politics, intelligence agencies and journalism to deny so much incontrovertible evidence of their so very, very publicly targeting us that had unfolded over many years.
Brian Haw did not cower in a TV studio or behind wrought iron gates on 9/11 or 7/7 and there were no terror attacks in the UK on my watch because we visibly defeated Westminster in their own capital with nothing more ‘extraordinary’ than the simple truth of the peace and harmony of the rule of law that exists for the benefit of everyone.
On June 23rd 2010 the High Court illegally denied me the most basic of basics in terms of legal representation and closed the court to the press and public to illegally stop me giving evidence in my own defence.
I am also when you think about it, a member of the public who they closed the court to, because the bent lawyers were busted by the evidence that proves they had really always been working together for the state in their whole Bindmans, Birnberg Pierce, Doughty and Garden Court Chambers circle jerk.
The key that unlocks that conspiracy is Labour’s Mr Brexit ’Sir’ Kier Starmer flipping from Head of Doughty Chambers in December 2005, to become Director of Public Prosecutions in 2008 who while in that post tried to dump his Paul Harris on us in 2010.
Starmer was the common denominator wearing different hats Westminster relied on to try and stop me forcing the repeal of their fraudulent legislation against us that was the ‘jewel in the crown’ of their multi-billion dollar war propaganda racket.
01.04.2017 BREXIT 'MAD DOG' MAYNIAC & SWIVEL-EYED LOON ‘FIVE EYES’ MURDOCH END MYTH THEY 'CARE' ABOUT BRITS IN EUROPEAN UNION, TO NOW THREATEN ALL CIVILIANS
On August 17th 2011 after and during various twists and turns everyone was therefore unsurprisingly slapped with a High Court jury lawsuit going all the way back to December 2005.
On October 7th 2011 the High Court in London confirmed there was no 'immunity' from our lawsuit.
It is self evident it is completely illegal for the state to take someone to ‘court’ and then stop that person who is a civilian from giving evidence in their own defence, while the three interconnected ‘pillars’ of politics, intel and journalism continue going blah di blah di blah di blah etc etc.
There was no way anyone could pretend I hadn't turned up in court on June 21st 2010, with not turning up to court being one of the many lies Westminster used to illegally deny me bail to try and falsely imprison me for as long as possible.
In June 2010 the High Court had been illegally going beyond trying to gloss over evidence to trying to stop any means of it even being put on the court record and considered.
The 'circumstances' hadn’t arisen in isolation but became central to a long publicly documented campaign waged by Westminster against we peaceniks with Westminster hiding behind the obviously false pretext of a 'War on Terror'.
There cannot possibly be a War on Terror when the entire apparatus of a state and then some, is being used against... peaceniks.
While their malicious prosecution was obviously intended to be a serious miscarriage over any pretence of ‘justice’ being done, what it really showed was that we had beaten fair and square with the peace and harmony of the rule of law, the three 'pillars' of politics, intel agencies and journalism lined up against us.
We had arrived at the ‘unique’ situation of a law abiding civilian being told they could NOT mount a defence in a court of law !! against war propaganda which is a crime being perpetrated by politics, intel agencies and journalism acting in concert/working together.
That is fascism.
It goes a long way to explaining attempts by the intel agencies et al floundering around trying to find ‘immunity’ outside a court of law in London.
I don't do the opinion mill of politics, intel agencies and journalism, but instead the facts and evidence of the peace and harmony of the rule of law because we are talking about real people's real lives.
We first saw Westminster try and do this by dishonestly purporting they could give ‘immunity’ to [for example] Moscow’s Russia Today et al in their MI5 ‘Democracy Village’ of all sorts.
[The legal details which raised eyebrows at the time with questions the former Mayor of London and now Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson could not/refused to answer in the High Court, before later not denying on the court record, show the BBC and Daily Mail hiding behind Moscow !!!!
Anthony Blunt clearly wasn't a patch on Boris Johnson et al]
This was followed by the ASIO Assange Wiki-woo trying to find ‘immunity’ hiding away in an embassy while spinning the full circle between the ‘journalism’ of [for example] the London Guardian, Moscow’s Russia Today and Murdoch’s Fox News and the now BBC-led New York Times in Washington.
In 2011, Robert Burns of the New York Times had curiously boasted having the ear of another armchair General Petraeus.
That was meaningless babble to a peacenik.
The typically effeminate ASIO Assange is only spinning for everything that passes itself off as ’journalism’ not civilians.
[ASIO Assange is busted working with Labour and Tories trying to hide the true stories of January 13th 2010 and May 25th 2010 which the Australian government did know about and were involved in]
Old 'Five Eyes' tall tales hide civilians 'unmasking' the triumvirate of politics, intel and journalism:
... 'source'... old 'five eyes' murdoch trying to hide what he is directly involved in...
The obvious central issue the war propaganda is 'sidestepping' is civilians 'blowing the whistle' in courts of law:
... in the UK, the long discredited intelligence agencies were 'unmasked' over the iraq war many, many years ago...
The 'test case' of the High Court malicious prosecution of Brian and I obviously had nothing to do with 'national security' and everything to do with the global war propaganda racket.
The Team Trump extravaganza is just another attempt to try and find immunity for public officials of all sorts.
In the UK the long discredited Murdoch [for example] was not working as a 'private citizen' doing 'journalism' when he was working with New Scotland Yard.
The Edward Snowden Hoax sees the Moscow hangout of this time an admitted spy in June 2013 trying to hijack through the Guardian and Moscow again, peaceniks speaking for themselves in a court of law.
The affrontery of them putting a spy out there spinning in that manner is a 'not in my name' disgrace for any civilian.
The Edward Snowden Hoax saw Glenn Greenwald ridiculously posturing in the High Court in London !! that ‘journalism’ had ’special rights’ over and above the rest of the human race before slinking off to hide behind Omidayr.
His was a blatantly fraudulent attempt to try and give ‘immunity’ to spook-dom hiding behind the cover of ‘journalism’.
It is right and proper that people ask what is ’journalism’ and what is war propaganda and who is really spinning it, because war propaganda is a very serious crime.
[The Guardian are arguably the biggest conduit in the UK for MI5 faux ‘liberal’ spin that has been set up through the unusual ‘Scott Trust’ front]
In any legal sense it remains a 'mystery' how the Guardian can call themselves any kind of 'Trust' spinning war propaganda.
Brexit is obviously all about the ‘immunity’ of politics spin again with the whole ’will of the people’ woo, which is just outright fascism that any sentient human being knows is absolutely unlawful.
The Team Trump spin now sees another armchair general Flynn posturing about ‘immunity’ before Congress because it is up to a point, outside the legal system of the European Union.
Most people know Trump is just the latest one fronting the same old, same old, politics, intel agencies and journalism now 'hiding' in 'full view' behind him.
When Trump opens his mouth, the words have been put there by the chief war propagandist Murdoch who the rest of 'journalism' follow.
There are no new faces in their War on Terror on civilian populations, since our days facing down the same lies in the High Court way back in 2010.
All they are trying to hide is the three ‘pillars’ of politics, intel agencies and journalism were slapped down IN A COURT OF LAW BY A... CIVILIAN BLOWING THE WHISTLE.
There are all sorts of fairytales spun around all manner of public officials blowing the whistle that are all ‘silent’ on a) civilians ‘blowing the whistle’ b) in courts of law.
The triumvirate of 'politics', 'intel' agencies and 'journalism' need to ask themselves some very, very serious questions.
All the war propaganda is about anyone but civilians ‘leaking’ anywhere but in a court of law because the multi-billion dollar war propaganda racket obviously totally relies on the opinion mill of the unlawful trial by media.
Most rational adults know that when you look behind the three ‘pillars’ of war propaganda’s politics, intelligence agencies and journalism what you see is corporate deals like those of MI6 'Sir' Alan Duncan's [now 'Minister for Europe'] Vitol Oil and their network of... bought and paid for terrorists like Mahdi al-Harati.
MI6 Vitol Oil's poster boy Mahdi al-Harati 'astonishingly' finds living the high life in Malta far more to his liking than cleaning up his own dirty deeds in Libya.
'LAND LAW' ?
The anniversary of the Falklands War 35 years ago inevitably brings the revolting old warlords crawling out of the woodwork with Murdoch cheer-leading them all on with the usual Sunday sofa talk:
... nato infighting ?... and the bellicose old armchair generals don't want to go to court because ??...
... 'draft's... old pirates and silver kettles at dawn...
You really can't make up the garbage Little Englanders in Westminster come out with sometimes:
... 'land law' and indeed any law being a completely unknown concept to the 'british' queen's gardener...
While the world exists within broadly defined parameters, civilians can always make progress for humanity against the tide of 'his'tory.
... 23rd May 2006 and being 'captured' by the 'Burgundian' English 'faction' in another 'Hundred Years War' who can't find anything to charge me with, which eventually knowing they face defeat on April 29th 2010, leads to their staging their MI5 'Democracy Village' starting on May 1st 2010 which is a busted flush on May 25th 2010...
The only genuine progress that can be made is through civilians trying to strengthen the EU Charter of Fundamental Freedoms that was acknowledged as legally binding in the Treaty of Lisbon.
It is self evident that the real ‘safeguard’ that needs to be restored are those that must make it possible for law abiding civilians to ‘blow the whistle’ on politics, intel agencies and journalism in courts of law.
There is the decent and civilized world built on the peace and harmony of the rule of law that exists for the benefit of everyone, or there is the gruesome world of war propaganda's savage and barbaric triumvirate of corporate politics, intel agencies and journalism's lies.