BREXIT ? : HOW EXACTLY WILL THE NASTY LITTLE FASCISTS ‘DECIDE’ WHO IS ‘LEGAL’ & WHO IS NOT ‘LEGAL’ IN THEIR GRAND SISYPHEAN DECEIT ? (19.02.2017)
In legal terms it has always been a mystery how the fascists planned to in fact ‘determine’ who is ‘legal’ and who is not ‘legal’ in the unparalleled nastiness of their grand sisyphean Brexit deceit.
The vicious little fascists did after all claim they could just tick a box and arbitrarily ‘vote’ to dismiss other people’s very real rights of a very many years, without so much as any thought or consideration whatsoever for real people’s real lives.
... westminster really did claim in the high court in central london that... 'two veterans' they maliciously targeted were a 'royal eyesore' which is not known as a crime in the real world...
The legal reality behind the facade of propaganda however is that Westminster were always legally obliged to outline the real world consequences for civilians of what always a foreseeable ‘outcome’ of their Brexit referendum.
It was never the case that Westminster is able to 'negotiate' all sorts of 'different rights' for their mates in the City of London and so on.
Westminster could not have just presumed to order those they maliciously... targeted pay to jump through this bureaucratic hoop or that bureaucratic hoop in their whole sausage machine while being put to every conceivable inconvenience possible.
... let us be honest that nothing was 'leaked' because westminster knew they always had a legal responsibility to outline the consequences of an entirely foreseeable outcome of their actions...
They said they didn’t even need any legal grounds for Brexit because let’s face it being a ‘royal eyesore’ was never any legal grounds to do anything either.
All the while all the fascists had to do was sit back and errr... laugh, and jeer and spread their hate far and wide, with their pre-packaged linguistic toolkit of ‘fake news’, ‘alternative facts’ and ’snowflakes’ etc etc etc.
And oh yes, several lines in a bill purporting Westminster could give themselves unfettered power.
The world of fascists is after all remarkably 'uncluttered' by the peace and harmony of the rule of law.
... weasel words that hide how any number of government 'agencies' do however illegally 'track' civilians... westminster do not like...
The fact no politician has any legal standing over those actually exercising their freedom who were btw purposefully excluded from any political or legal representation was not a real world truth anyone cared to mention, because it isn't something anyone could pretend was any kind of 'democracy'.
The thing is, I have never noticed any decent and civilized law abiding civilians anywhere laughing about what lawless Westminster does with reckless disregard that causes serious identifiable harm to civilians lives.