BREXIT ? : WESTMINSTER HAVE 'NO LEGAL STANDING' TO 'REPRESENT' THOSE MOST IMMEDIATELY AFFECTED OVER EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP IN 'REFERENDUM' DECEIT (07.02.2017)
It is an incontrovertible fact that Westminster did know when they invented their fraudulent Brexit 'referendum' that the one group of people there was no pretense would ever be 'represented' by any MP, are those most immediately affected.
Westminster could not go to any court and claim they had 'legal standing' to 'represent' those they actually refused to 'represent' during their fraudulent 'referendum'.
There is no pretense that anyone who is actually using their European citizenship is 'represented' by any MP, proving what a fraudulent portrayal of 'democracy' the whole sham of the Brexit 'referendum' has always been.
This is not what 'democracy' looks like:
... a complete fraud by all the 'politicians' and all the 'news' media who know those most immediately affected because they are using their european citizenship, are not represented by any MP, who will not lose any votes from those they do not represent...
It's absolutely unlawful for Westminster to pretend they can 'negotiate'/horse-trade over those Westminster in practice willfully effectively disenfranchised and refused to 'represent' while holding their 'referendum':
... hot air... that is no 'democracy'...
It is a legal impossibility for anyone in Westminster to claim they 'represent' those in the UK or EU using their European Union citizenship, they have always refused to 'represent'.
... it's all just complete garbage... they have no legal standing to 'vote' anywhere regarding people and their european citizenship, the politicians admitted they don't represent...
Westminster purposefully effectively 'disenfranchised' those who are not represented by any MP, while being most immediately affected by their wilful deceit.
It's not just something that slipped by the notice of the whole entourage of government lawyers in Whitehall all this time.
The British PM cannot go to the European Union or any court now and claim she or anyone else in Westminster or the European Union suddenly 'represents' those Westminster chose to refuse to 'represent' in the referendum because a) it was something politicians could not 'vote' on so b) there were no 'votes' in it for any of them.
It shows how 'democracy' and the rule of law can be seriously manipulated and undermined through 'politicians' personal self interest in holding an arbitrary 'vote' over something they have no say over in the first place, so cannot really 'lose' any kind of 'votes' over themselves.
Westminster deliberately first maliciously targeted the group most immediately affected, to try and stop everyone trying to keep their freedom, because of course no-one should lose their freedom.
In fact Westminster's own Miller case, which was a complete set up for the whole media circus, is 'distinguished' from everyone else by much.
This includes the 'unusual' fact Lord Pannick recruited some people for the purpose of... 'voluntarily'... surrendering... themselves to the arbitrary unknown whims of the British Parliament he is part of, in return for money a) after the fraudulent referendum, and b) despite some not being 'represented' by any MP at any time.
The legal reality that Westminster have always been hiding always was no-one had to vote to keep their European Union citizenship or indeed any other citizenship which always arises through the rule of law.
In the most blatant abuse of 'democracy' everyone most immediately directly affected a) did not have any politician 'representing' them, while b) being illegally denied free legal representation of their choosing over c) the most serious attempt to steal their European citizenship and all that flows from that.
The whole Brexit has been a completely unlawful 'trial by media'.
It is not the case that people only have the freedoms Westminster might 'choose' to give or try and take away from people on any given day.