UNSC SPONSORED SAUDI BE-HEADINGS DISTRACT FROM MAKING IT MANDATORY FOR ALL WORLD LEADERS TO PUT THEIR OWN NECKS ON THE LINE, BY JOINING ICC (04.01.2016)

The UNSC sponsored media generated furore over the House of Saud using their role as chair of the UN ‘Human Rights’ Council to welcome in a New Year with be-headings, only serves to remind everyone that not just the 47 members of the OHCHR are unwilling to put their own necks on the line first over the rule of law.

The be-headings disguise that all world leaders have no excuses for not making it mandatory for all countries to have to join the International Criminal Court to work to strengthen the rule of law to stop the arbitrary death penalty of war on entire civilian populations.

 

...brian haw parliament square, london june 2nd 2001


This brings us back to the illegal Iraq War, because it is impossible for Iraq to join the ICC, while they are occupied and have an illegal sectarian constitution imposed upon them.

 

22.11.2015 THE UNSC WEAPONS SUPPLY LINE OF DIVIDE & RULE WOULD END, IF IT WERE MANDATORY FOR ALL COUNTRIES TO JOIN THE ICC, TO STRENGTHEN THE RULE OF LAW

The obvious reality is all world leaders, and particularly the five permanent members of the UNSC are not the brave and courageous law abiding souls their reputation managers often try and portray.

 

If world leaders really were entirely honorable, they would put their own necks on the line first, by agreeing to make it mandatory for all countries to have to join the ICC, with armies of lawyers in tow instead.

To anyone looking for solutions to corporate war, the two-faced UNSC are a primary problem because they are nothing more than one joined up weapons supply line of disinformation used to try and artificially divide and rule all civilian populations around the world, far beyond any administrative role of politics.

This is starkly shown with the Russian arrivistes belated grandstanding in Syria that civilians are supposed to be ‘grateful’ to Russia for providing some limited weapons for Syrians to try and defend their lives from what have been unprecedented truckloads of private armies for years.

 

It is grotesquely obscene that civilian lives should be traded over by ostensibly any politics, that are really reduced to weapons.

Any right to reasonable force in self-defence is inevitably 'complicated' by the likes of Putin himself saying that he is friends with anyone, including the Saudis.

Of course Russia has always been first and foremost a bought and paid up member supporting the European military garrison called Israel and the bogus war on terror.

 

While there is a role for administrative politics everywhere, there is no role for the UNSC trying to artificially divide and rule all civilian populations around the world, through what is really one weapons supply line.

The truth of Two World wars where ALL European and Russian inbred 'royalty' and 'political' leaders slaughtered millions upon millions upon millions more of their ‘own’ civilians than any other world leaders in history have ever done, remains largely unspoken.

All world leaders do business as usual in the corporate world, whatever time wasting 'news' media and 'politics' might disingenuously claim.

The International Criminal Court arose after Pinochet, because Europe wanted another layer/vehicle to try and offload the rule of law to, because of course there is universal jurisdiction over war crimes in (for example) European courts [that ‘politicians’ cannot ‘legislate’ away, not least since corporate legislation including the bogus war on terror, can be repealed]

While the US claim they do not come under the jurisdiction of the ICC who thus far claim they can ignore universal jurisdiction, what is really going on is the US are complicit in using violent means to thus far try and ensure that troops stationed in Europe under NATO do not come under universal jurisdiction in European courts.

It was the Iraq War that defined the times we live in because unprecedented numbers of law abiding civilians all around the world who were not led by any 'politics' or 'news' media opposed the war and never changed their minds.

This was the true ‘awakening’ where law abiding civilians demanded the rule of law, which all news ‘media’ and ‘politics’ have mocked while disguising state violence is [for example] illegally used in Britain to try and stop law abiding civilians bringing successful legal challenges in courts of law.

The oil glut has inevitably exposed all manner of opportunistic horse-trading, focused on corporate profits, rather than saving civilian lives.

The illegal war on Iraq has brought massive corporate profits bolstered by the bogus war on terror, which was then unleashed on Syria through the unprecedented use of private armies.

What the largely controlled 9/11 Truth movement gloss over is that the US & UK were desperate to wage war when the UN found it impossible to keep covering up that 500,000 Iraqi children were murdered by illegal sanctions on Iraq, before 9/11 and the creation of the ICC.

 

....dennis halliday resigned from the UN, because the illegal sanctions on iraq were genocide


The Afghanistan War actually served to disguise the murder of 500,000 Iraqi children, while building up the al-Qaeda legend, because al-Qaeda were always US mercenaries.

It is the illegal use of private armies now that is really all that is stopping the US-led war on Syria and occupation of Iraq ending.

 

03.01.2016 ACHILLES HEEL: BRITISH PARLIAMENT & ATTORNEY GENERAL IN LEGAL TROUBLE OVER SYRIA AIR STRIKES VOTE THAT SEEKS TO LEGITIMIZE... PRIVATE ARMIES

It is pointless to talk about the lethally armed so called Syrian 'Opposition' as anything other than private armies which are absolutely unlawful, because anything else distracts from the true legal situation, which is always the obstacle the warmongers are trying to hide.

 

...the paris terror attacks did not change british 'public opinion' that remains overwhelmingly opposed to overthrowing... the syrian government


When illegal sanctions were removed from Iran, the US simply upped the ante in Venezuela to try and smash Petrocaribe.

[The US interference in Venezuela has revealed an unfortunate but obvious vulnerability in socialist politics that are too reliant on natural resources]

Meanwhile the reality is Israel need the US & Europe more than the US or Europe have ever needed the European military garrison called Israel, because it is a self-evident truth for everyone to see that the US & Europe would deal with any leader in the Middle East really.

The European military garrison called Israel is just an incredibly profitable corporate ATM machine in oil wars.

The real battle over upholding the certainty of the rule of law to protect life always takes place outside the column inches of meaningless yet malicious 'news' media waffle.

This is because the certainty of the rule of law does not change to suit any 'politics' or 'news' media.

 

Law abiding civilians who consistently consider the rule of law can usually see and understand what 'politics' and 'news' media are doing.

The battle to try and protect civilian life is not primarily premised on any politics that are vulnerable to all manner of variables, but instead tries to strengthen the certainty of the rule of law.

Any legitimate politics is only ever primarily built upon the consistency of the certainty of the rule of law.

 


It is an incontrovertible fact that illegal wars would be that much harder to wage and the rule of law significantly strengthened, if the starting point is that it is mandatory for all countries to have to join the ICC to be recognized.

 

A mandatory obligation to join the ICC for countries to be internationally recognized [and thus trade etc] would immediately reverse entire civilian populations being vulnerable to the lucrative two-faced UNSC weapons supply line run UN.

 

Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.

 

Blowjob