ACHILLES HEEL: BRITISH PARLIAMENT & ATTORNEY GENERAL IN LEGAL TROUBLE OVER SYRIA AIR STRIKES VOTE THAT SEEKS TO LEGITIMIZE... PRIVATE ARMIES (03.01.2016)
It is always the case that the corporate marketing campaign for war waged by all British news media illegally covers up what is really going on.
The true purpose of the illegal vote for air strikes in Syria is the British Parliament of all political shades trying to legitimize private armies, which are of course absolutely unlawful, whatever moniker they claim they fly under on any given day.
private armies/death squads:...law abiding civilians are not going to be lectured to by tony buckingham and his private armies with the likes of emile ghessen from royal marines 40 commandos trying to cover their tracks in iraq and now syria
The British Parliament of all political shades have dishonestly claimed they have the legal standing to: a) conduct a ‘vote’ to b) ignore the Syrian government and do whatever they like in Syria, then so do all the private armies.
It is self-evident that this is not something the British Parliament of any political shade is willing to argue in any court of law, because there is “no recognized defence in law” to supporting private armies in Syria or indeed Iraq.
It is impossible to disguise that the true purpose of the air-strikes 'vote' was to try and provide far from legal cover for private armies.
It is no co-incidence that the likes of Emile Ghessen are dishonestly trying to cover the tracks of the British Parliament of all political shades over the illegal Iraq War in 2003.
It was no co-incidence that Stake-knife Corbyn who is an anti-Syrian government propagandist and cheerleader for private armies appointed Blair's henchman the unelected Lord Falconer and the Iraq War criminal Hilary Benn to his war cabinet, while all news media dribble on about him being 'anti-war'.
All the war propaganda ‘sidesteps’ that the so called lethally armed identifiable so called Syrian Opposition are not unknown private armies, because instead all rely on real funding and lethal weapons being given to real people.
Indeed Murdoch & Co publicly boast of having meetings with these private armies so there is no difficulty whatsoever in knowing or finding these people.
The 'news' media have always had a name and number to "go to".
Later press releases coming out of Cameron's pig farm are all a distraction from the reality it is the Syrian government who are legitimately fighting all the private armies.
[N.B: It is a matter of fact Lord Rothermere's lying Daily Mail embedded with the British government undercover operation called 'Democracy Village' to try and murder our unarmed defence-less Parliament Square Peace Campaign for goodness sakes)
The phoney 'Islamic State' are nothing more than agitprop used by the British Parliament to try and disguise their trying to illegally overthrow the Syrian government while continuing to occupy Iraq.
[N.B: Update 04.01.2016: the British 'government' and 'news' media are predictably 'outing' one of their own, Anjem Choudary recruits
There is never any need to waste anyone’s time with all the news media fairytales, because they are all part of one weasel worded UNSC weapons supply line of disinformation who always dishonestly mis-represent the certainty of the rule of law, if they even happen to mention it, among selling their wares.
The not at all alternative news media follow the well established pattern of the MSM in trying their hardest to stop law abiding civilians bringing successful legal challenges in courts of law to stop war.
It is after all not at all difficult for rational law abiding civilians to understand there is “no recognized defence in law” to supporting private armies in Syria.
This applies to any private army including opportunistic Kurdish ‘political’ leaders who do not have special rights over and above other civilians in Syria or Iraq.
It is when you consistently live by the certainty of the rule of law that the very many layers of liars engaged in corporate war are fully exposed.
It is what the UK Attorney General would not say about legal standing and private armies, that he could not rely on standing on a witness stand before a jury in... a court of law.
The British Attorney General Dominic Grieve was replaced by Wright in case they should ever find themselves on a witness stand [and not just over the air-strikes vote]
It is a matter of fact the UK Attorney General had no legal grounds at what is the true starting point.
All the very many gatekeepers are ever doing is trying to stop access to courts of law to protect their own bank balances, which rely on the one UNSC weapons supply line to try and artificially divide and rule civilian populations, far beyond any legitimate 'political' forum.
The real battle over upholding the certainty of the rule of law to protect life always takes place outside the column inches of meaningless yet malicious 'news' media waffle.
UPDATE: 04.01.2016 The evidence is bogus 'news' headlines only show that they are trying to play catch-up and cover-up over their private armies.
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.