WAR CRIMES ALERT: UK & AUSTRALIA CITE INVADE SYRIA 'IN DEFENCE OF IRAQ' DOUBLE ACT IGNORES INVIOLABLE UNIVERSALLY RECOGNIZED SYRIAN SOVEREIGNTY (10.09.2015)
The Syrian government have lawfully protected the major cities in western Syria where most civilians have always lived for years, despite all the very many foreign backed lethally armed mercenaries of many monikers including the ‘Islamic State’,’Free Syria Army’’, ’al-Nusra’ etc.
It is matter of practical and legal fact that all the many monikered foreign backed lethally armed mercenaries only continue to exist because they fly completely under the far from legal cover of a US-led ‘coalition’ through supply lines across deserts and borders.
The idea that supposed 'military logic' is a new 'raison d'etre' to invade foreign countries, is obviously a non-starter because it doesn't bear any relationship to civilian society's rule of law.
the military logic lie
british parliamentarians have 'no recognized defence in law' to 'rely' on what they 'see on television and read in the newspapers'
The British Parliamentarian and 'lawyer' Ms Qureshi knows the British Parliament have no recognized defence if law to 'rely' on what they know is criminal war propaganda.
Whatever you believe about who the ‘Islamic State’ is they are as criminal as the US-led coalition who also publicly claim they can slaughter any civilians in Syria who stand in their way of installing whatever government will support them.
There is only one difference between the actions of the US-led coalition and the fake ‘Islamic State’ who all treat all civilians who stand in the way of what they want as ‘collateral damage’.
The Daily Mail et al are squeamish about repeatedly publishing footage of RAF bombs decapitating innocent civilians.
It is a matter of practical and legal facts that the US-led ‘coalition’ only supports and protects all lethally armed foreign mercenaries whose sole objective is to illegally overthrow the internationally recognized Syrian government.
In reality, the Syrian government are standing for all recognized law that exists to protect humanity.
It is a matter of practical and legal fact the US-led coalition has never had any intention of moving their mercenary terrorists out of their enclave in Raqqa where they happily sit creating war propaganda for the Daily Mail et al to disseminate.
Indeed it is the whole Raqqa Wahabi roadshow that exposes the true purpose of US-led military action in the Middle East is to try and fully seize control of Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Yemen and Iran.
The only purpose of US-led airstrikes in Syria, has always been to protect all the foreign backed lethally armed mercenaries.
The US-led coalition is not at all bothered about any civilian in Syria being slaughtered by any lethally armed foreign backed mercenaries.
It will remain a universally recognized legal reality long after the latest British ‘Foreign Secretary’ has left office that there is a universally recognized sovereign state of Syria which has a sovereign government that does not have any legal obligation to ’follow orders’ from the British regime.
"allowed": the british regime's 'islamic state' mask is slipping only showing they are war criminals, daring to suggest they can dish out orders at the end of military strikes to the universally recognized syrian government
In fact it is US-led support for the ‘Islamic State’ in Iraq that is one of many threats to the sovereign state of Syria.
How the British regime try and ‘manage’ their illegal occupation of Iraq, does not extend to the British regime having any lawful ‘rights’ in Syria, to try and run the sovereign state of Syria. who lawfully make their own decisions.
The Syrian government have actually managed a remarkable achievement in protecting the major cities in western Syria for many years now, where most civilians have always lived.
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.