BRITISH ‘FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE’ ADMIT MI6 INTELLIGENCE ASSET ‘JOURNALIST’ PATRICK COCKBURN ET AL SYRIA WAR [PROPAGANDA] IS A ‘BUSTED FLUSH’ (10.09.2015)
It is a provable fact in a court of law that all ‘journalists’ in Westminster illegally collaborate with the British regime to publicly disseminate information that they all know to be false, for the express purpose of murdering civilians.
On August 21st 2015, in an effort to progress addressing this multi-trillion dollar very dangerous criminality and save civilian lives, I informed the owners of the ‘Independent’ to cease and desist their war propaganda which they knew was criminal, backed up the with evidence.
I included very simple accounts of Patrick Cockburn, Robert Fisk and Kim Segupta publicly disseminating information that they knew to be false for their express purpose of civilians being murdered in the US-led war on Syria.
21.08.2015 MESSAGE TO INDEPENDENT EDITOR: STOP PUBLISHING CRIMINAL WAR PROPAGANDA BY COCKBURN, FISK & SEGUPTA TO SUPPORT US, UK & TURKISH INVASION OF SYRIA (21.08.2015)
Westminster Village is long well versed in trying to do all it can to try and keep us out of High courts of law with a jury, because we have always eventually won even without a High Court jury that is only about our putting them on trial.
On September 7th 2015, in response the British regime came back with their fairytale that they had conducted a drone strike on a British national in Syria on August 21st 2015, leaving it up to the corporate ‘news’ media to gloss over the finer details of that obvious lie.
It was their way of still trying to claim they can murder civilians wherever they like, while being careful to only claim to have bumped off what everyone knows is one of their own mercenaries, so it is all still a lie.
It is the same as they don’t exactly enthusiastically jump up and down publicly broadcasting the reality that we forced the repeal of bogus war on terror corporate legislation.
The British Daily Telegraph are indeed publishing criminal war propaganda when they try and use it to claim their war propaganda is above civilian society’s rule of law.
bought and paid for war propaganda: economist 'ad' at old street station, london in february 2012
On September 8th 2015 the Foreign Affairs Committee hastily convened and Patrick Cockburn and the Committee et al all agreed that [not just] their war propaganda was a ‘busted flush’ because ‘we are paying people to write what we want to hear’ and the British Parliament ‘rely on what we see on television and the ’news’ media.
busted flush...we paid them to tell us what we wanted to know
Indeed war propaganda really is a multi-trillion dollar business.
In fact the ‘meeting’ was a continuing exercise in their trying to provide far from ‘legal cover’ all round for each other because the Parliamentary record can be used in legal proceedings.
It is the word 'rely' they the British Parliament and their war propagandists are stretching the legality of because the intended consequence of criminal war propaganda is that it that leads to war.
it is the british parliament dishonestly claiming it can 'rely' on what 'we see on television and read in the newspapers' which is where the whole legal argument lies
The Metropolitan Police did what Cockburn has done, when they admitted they were trying to hide behind Parliamentary cover by handing over the evidence saying 'both houses and black rod' [British Parliament] told them to do whatever they wanted to try and smash our civilian resistance in May 2006.
The British regime were apparently seriously put out trying to explain the concept of 'legal grounds' overseas everyone knew they could not produce.
imagine the 'embarrassment' of the british regime trying to explain what 'everyone was talking about'..'the only topic of conversation' which was why legal grounds are actually necessary after so many years of wholesale lies
The issue of putting British soldiers on the ground in Syria was raised again by Julien Barnes-Dacey from the European Council of Foreign Relations.
british troops on the ground in syria
The former Attorney General Dominic Grieve who we have also won against, made some tangential legal ‘representations’ of no legal consequence that all try to resile from the legal reality the starting point remains the Syrian government are the universally recognized legitimate government of Syria.
air strikes 'buy time'
The desire of the British regime is to try and ‘buy time’ now it is widely acknowledged they are by and large defeated in Syria.
What is now an insurmountable legal obstacle for the British regime is to try and pretend through all manner of war propaganda and military ‘might’ that they can ignore the sovereign rights of the universally recognized Syrian government.
This is because while war propaganda which is certainly criminal may be published it carries no legal weight, but does expose what is criminal war propaganda when it is knowingly being used to conspire to illegally overthrow a sovereign state.
Cockburn was certainly running to try and hide behind Parliamentary cover, most probably because he really is actually MI6 through and through, because his war propaganda is certainly very definitively MI6 stock in trade.
I suppose if we had unwittingly challenged the legality of what included the actions of an MI6 officer or two, going on shocking past experiences of our exposing agent provocateurs, that would have sent them all into all manner of legal apoplexies of an extraordinary dimension too.
The fact many are not who they claim to be in Westminster Village is an inevitable reality one came to learn through many years campaigning at the belly of such a horrendously Genocidal beast.
The regime were certainly up to no good when we disrupted the City of London and Mayor of London's plot in fraudulently suddenly trying to pass themselves off as our civilian resistance by stashing our Parliament Square Peace Campaign property they stole in the 'Museum of London' just like the con-artist Mark Wallinger's rip off 'State Britain' in Tate Britain.
It nevertheless remains a provable fact in a court of law, that war propaganda itself is a multi-trillion dollar carefully choreographed business process with an end product it sells, that is evidentially criminal.
"allowed": the british regime's 'islamic state' mask is slipping only showing they are war criminals, daring to suggest they can dish out orders at the end of military strikes to the universally recognized syrian government
There are no circumstances or legitimate aim in the publishing of corporate war propaganda that the British Parliament & corporate 'news' media knew to be untrue and they used for the specific purposes of civilians being murdered, so the whole war machine made money.
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.