UK ILLEGALLY REFUSE TO PROSECUTE BIRNBERG’S JET SETTING AL-QAEDA TERRORIST BHERLIN GILDO TO MISLEAD PUBLIC IN CALL FOR UK TROOPS IN SYRIA (01.06.2015)
Who would have thought that after 9/11 & 7/7 the British regime would provocatively dare to publicly tell civilian society that they a) refuse to prosecute Al-Qaeda terrorists b) because they work for them.
Most people understand the latest NATO propaganda is actually another attempt that exposes just how desperate the regime are to give a false perception that the British government have legal grounds, that do not exist, for sending their own 'official' troops to invade Syria.
the uk regime's illegal refusal to prosecute berhlin gildo is as good as saying any lethally armed terrorist can pop down to (for example) parliament square and pick off any civilians they don't like
Any perception that a refusal by the British regime to prosecute their own NATO terrorists in a Crown Court is the same as their having legal grounds that would pass muster in the High Court, for British troops to invade Syria, would be completely wrong.
There are more holes in their criminal propaganda than you can poke a stick at.
The British regime have nevertheless certainly confirmed our long held legal point that unarmed civilian resistance to NATO cannot even access legal representation, which just of itself made any nevertheless malicious prosecutions of us wholly illegal.
The wholly corrupt human rights ‘law’ firms of which Birnberg Pierce are right up there, have always been gatekeepers representing bloody terrorists collecting their paychecks from Genocidal NATO regimes.
It would be illuminating to see the UK regime watching Bherlin Ghildo use his lethal weapons on any civilian he does not like in Parliament Square, because that is what they are saying it is okay for their terrorists to do.
It is slightly more than an 'embarrassment' that as we have said, the 'security services' have never been 'fighting' terrorists.
It is pretty obvious that NATO 'intelligence services' are employing criminal mercenaries from private security firms and prisons.
the foreign backed mercenary terrorist has publicly admitted being a terrorist in syria
A Dr Wilkinson from UCL who was touted as an 'expert witness' of at best corruption for the (non) 'prosecution' has noticeably provided no public evidence, which stinks.
another 'expert' supporter of illegal british wars
In legal terms it is impossible to claim that the phoney ‘Islamic State’ are anything other than yet another spin off from the same bunch of lying, thieving mass murderers.
All the lethally armed foreign backed Syrian 'Opposition' are mercenary terrorists.
People will be curious to see the signature on errr...jet setting Mr Bherlin Gildo’s et al’s pay-checks, because no-one flies for free.
Never let it be claimed that any NATO regime has ever existed to protect civilian populations anywhere.
08.07.2005: there has always been the criminal intent to arm their al-qaeda mercenary terrorists
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.