BRITISH 'EU TEST CASE' OVER NATO MILITARY TRAINING SYRIAN TERRORISTS IN TURKEY, OUTSIDE ANY LEGAL ACCOUNTABILITY IN BRITISH/EU COURTS (27.03.2015)
In amongst the legal ducking and diving of NATO all over the place over their undeclared War on Syria, the legal grounds of one administrative authority (the UK in the EU) transferring military power for use to/under the control of a second country (Turkey) to militarily affect a third country (Syria) without their consent, remains non-existent.
The central issue of importance is that the UK (and for that read EU) incredibly wants to train Syrian terrorists who unlike the British military will act completely outside any pretence of legal accountability in any British or European court of law.
looks like the 'Commander' of Turkish armed forces Necdet Ozel must have sent for the phoney old 'Islamic State' to get such nice new 'plumbing' sorted so hastily in such a 'hostile' environment
US & Turkish governments are obviously chafing at the bit to invade Syria.
In legal terms it remains impossible for Britain to offer any ‘military support’ of any kind to anyone who wishes to use lethal weapons inside Syria without the consent of the Syrian government.
Obviously the British government are not going to admit that Syrian terrorists will be operating under their military command in Syria which leaves the British military in a huge legal black-hole.
In simple terms if you cut out Turkey, it is self-evident that the British government could not train Syrian terrorists in Britain, so they cannot train Syrian terrorists in Turkey.
the "i've got a badge" brigade in ankara march 11th 2015
If there was no legal challenge to Britain's overt use of mercenaries in Syria, Britain (and for that read the EU) will use the pretext of the phoney 'Islamic State', to send in their 'official' mercenaries who are the British Army et al, with what will really be a NATO invasion of Syria to overthrow the Syrian government.
The British government (who are only 'masters' in deceit) knew that if there was no legal challenge to their overtly training Syrian terrorists in Turkey, there could not be a legal challenge to the British military invading Syria along with the rest of NATO and Turkey et al.
In legal terms we are challenging the deceit behind many seemingly innocuous military 'actions' that are actually put in place to wage overt illegal wars and occupations.
A legal challenge can also include the fact, NATO routinely try to get around much by not actually overtly declaring war.
a right turkey strutting his stuff in syria: it doesn't get more cowardly than bending over for NATO
Either people always support society's rule of law or they illegally support Genocidal NATO who have never had any legal grounds for being in the Middle East.
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.