BRITISH POLITICIANS NEED TO PUT UP -LEGAL GROUNDS- (THAT THEY DO NOT HAVE) FOR PROPOSED AIRSTRIKES IN SYRIA & IRAQ, OR SHUT UP. (21.09.2014)
It would be far more straightforward if no self-serving corporate politician was allowed to open their foul and murderous corrupt mouths on any public platform, unless they could produce a -legal ground- to back up whatever their disgusting soundbite happened to be.
The murderous Labour Party are the latest suggesting the British Parliament could be recalled for a vote on illegal airstrikes in Syria and Iraq, before going on to waft on about the obvious need for legal grounds.
Milliband would do well to find that ever absent legal ground -before- opening his mouth, and if he cannot, well I am not the only one who strongly recommends he keeps his filthy dirty corrupt mouth, firmly shut.
Ditto Kid Cameron grandstanding at the U.N.
It’s called put up or shut up.
The best Milliband is alerting people to, is the fact that on Sunday he didn't have a -legal ground- no-one is going to suddenly dream up by Thursday, despite the continuing black propaganda of corporate journalists who at the very best, it can be said, 'chose' to go to Syria etc.
I personally believe that Patrick Cockburn bears all the hallmarks of a spook whose job it is to plant particular material in the 'media' etc, which doesn't really work with the greater use of the internet by people these days.
Breedlove & Campbell: two NATO criminals with no -legal grounds- left that justify their miserable existences as tools for the corporate state.
Some ‘international law’ that already has Milliband & Co. running is ‘universal jurisdiction’ which puts them in the dock already for being entirely complicit in Genocide.
the rule of law: the offensive Campbell & Co. lecturing the occupied on what the illegal occupier doesn't practice.
It is the British government running from the overwhelming evidence in our ground-breaking High Court claims that they are trying to smash our campaign -because- they are the ones committing Genocide.
It remains that anyone who is really interested in stopping the Islamic State would be prosecuting those -governments- supplying weapons to the likes of the 'Islamic State' in return for stolen oil.