SYRIA: HOLDING A ‘COALITION’ OF MURDEROUS WESTERN ‘LAWYERS’ TO ACCOUNT. (02.05.2014)
There is considerable growing evidence, that over the years, a ‘coalition’ of British ‘lawyers’ are complicit in, facilitating brutal and illegal wars of aggression, waged by the British government.
These 'lawyers' are all currently singing from the same hymn sheet, banging the drums of war, trying to rally -public- support, again (that is no-where to be found) for U.N led, 'military' intervention in Syria.
CNBC promoting propaganda...the biggest mass murderer of our times claims to be a...'lawyer'
A 'coalition' of 'lawyers' are conspiring with the British government to murder law abiding people, who do go to British courts, to try to save...everyone’s...lives.
Subject: SYRIA: HOLDING A ‘COALITION’ OF MURDEROUS WESTERN ‘LAWYERS’ TO ACCOUNT. (02.05.2014)
Date: 2 May 2014 18:06:46 CEST
INTER ARMA ENIM SILENT LEGES
This email is to notify the British government and the ‘coalition’ of ‘lawyers’ who are signatories to the letter dated April 28th 2014, in the Guardian,
Professor Payam Akhavan Professor of international law, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Professor Mashood A Baderin Director, Centre of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law, SOAS, University of London
Geoffrey Bindman QC Founder, Bindmans LLP
Professor Laurence Boisson de Chazournes Professor of international law, University of Geneva, Switzerland (Between 1995 and 1999, she was Senior counsel with the Legal Department of the World Bank)
Professor Michael Bothe Professor emeritus of public law, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Nicolas Bratza Former president of the European court of human rights
Toby Cadman Barrister, 9 Bedford Row International (Senior Crown Prosecutor, CPS Special Crime Division October 2009 – April 2010)
Professor Stephen Chan Professor of world politics, SOAS, University of London
Dr Hans Corell Under-secretary-general for legal affairs and the legal counsel of the United Nations, 1994-2004; CSCE war crimes rapporteur in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Croatia; former judge of appeal and chief legal adviser of the Swedish ministry of justice and ministry for foreign affairs
Professor Irwin Cotler Emeritus professor of Law, McGill University; member of the Canadian parliament; former minister of justice & attorney general of Canada
Dr Emily Crawford Lecturer, Sydney law school, University of Sydney
John Dowd QC Former New South Wales attorney general
Professor John Dugard Professor emeritus, universities of Leiden and Witwatersrand; former member of UN International Law Commission
Professor Pierre-Marie Dupuy Professor emeritus, University of Paris (Panthéon-Assas), Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Genèva
Professor Max du Plessis Professor of law, University of KwaZulu-Natal
Elizabeth Evatt Former member of UN human rights committee
Professor Jared Genser Adjunct professor of law, Georgetown University; co-editor, UN Security Council in the Age of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2014)He is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Besides being qualified to practice law in Maryland and the District of Columbia, he is also a solicitor of England and Wales.
Richard Goldstone Former chief prosecutor of the UN international criminal tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda; former justice, constitutional court of South Africa; chairperson of the Commission of Inquiry regarding Public Violence and Intimidation (Goldstone Commission)
Professor Jan Klabbers Academy professor (Martti Ahtisaari chair), University of Helsinki
Professor Pierre Klein Professor of international law, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
Anthony Lester QC Blackstone Chambers (member of the House of Lords who have tirelessly worked to smash our Parliament Square Peace Campaign)
Tawanda Mutasah International law scholar, New York University
Aryeh Neier Distinguished visiting professor at Paris School of International Affairs, Sciences Po; president emeritus of the Open Society Foundations
Professor Alain Pellet Professor, Université Paris-Ouest, Nanterre-La Défense; former chairperson, International Law Commission, United Nations; member, Institut de Droit international
Professor Javaid Rehman Professor of Islamic and international law, Brunel University, London
Professor Nigel Rodley Chairperson, University of Exeter Human Rights Centre
Professor Leila Nadya Sadat Professor of law and director of the Whitney R Harris World Law Institute, Washington University school of law; special adviser on crimes against humanity to the ICC prosecutor
Professor Philippe Sands QC University College London
Frances Webber Garden Court Chambers
Professor William A Schabas Professor of international law, Middlesex University
Phil Shiner Principal, Public Interest Lawyers
Professor Willem van Genugten Professor of international law, Tilburg University, the Netherlands
Professor Guglielmo Verdirame King's College London
Professor Mark V Vlasic Senior fellow & adjunct professor of law, Georgetown University; former legal officer, office of the prosecutor, UN international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
Dr Hakeem Yusuf Senior lecturer & director of LLM Programmes in human rights, school of law, University of Strathclyde
that there is a legal..barrier, to the cross border delivery of ‘aid’ in Syria, that does not have the consent of the Syrian government.
"...As a coalition of leading international lawyers and legal experts, we judge that there is no legal barrier to the UN directly undertaking cross-border humanitarian operations..."
The U.N and western government ‘aid’ agencies have no legal grounds or lawful authority to interfere, (including through the use of force) in what are very clearly ongoing Syrian government security operations, that really are designed to protect life.
It is self evident, that the primary ‘humanitarian’ concern is to establish security, to protect life, in Syria.
The responsibility to establish security remains with the Syrian government, and the efforts of your ‘coalition’ of lawyers, like those of the western backed armed opposition, in Syria, are obviously designed to very seriously undermine that primary lawful objective.
I remind the named lawyers, that every genuine campaign has a legal basis.
THE ARMED WESTERN GOVERNMENT BACKED SYRIAN OPPOSITION ARE ACTING ILLEGALLY.
no legitimate campaigner is going to be in the 'camp' of these two.
In Syria, there are no legal grounds that allow people to pick up lethal weapons, supplied by foreign governments, to wage war, to murder fellow human beings, simply to install a government paid for and to the liking of mass murdering war criminals, in...western governments, and their ‘allies’.
SYRIA: CIA 'TOW' TRAINING.
The western government backed, armed Syrian Opposition, are very clearly acting illegally, including through their use of Syrian civilians as human shields.
IN EASTERN UKRAINE PEOPLE ARE LEGITIMATELY CHALLENGING A CIA...MILITARY COUP.
This contrasts with the situation in Eastern Ukraine, where people are legitimately challenging, what is a CIA military coup in Kiev.
27.04.2014 UKRAINE: PEOPLE IN EASTERN UKRAINE CHALLENGE WESTERN GOVT...MILITARY MACHINE.
28.04.2014 UKRAINE: EASTERN UKRAINE CHALLENGES DANGEROUS WESTERN MEDIA PROPAGANDA.
THE ‘COALITION’ OF NAMED ‘LAWYERS’ ARE NOT UPHOLDING LAW CONSISTENTLY.
The ‘coalition’ of lawyers who have signed the letter, clearly do support illegal western backed...military coups/wars, whether it is in Syria, Ukraine, or elsewhere.
mass murdering...western...'lawyers' horse-trading over human...life.
The fact that all those who signed the letter have publicly revealed their support for the illegitimate (former and current) war criminals who have seized power of the British government, along with the likes of the Qatari and Saudi Arabian ‘governments’, proves that it is neither the rule of law that exists to protect life, or democracy, that interests your ‘coalition’ of lawyers.
In legal terms, to save lives, the western backed Syrian Opposition need to be disarmed and properly held to account in a court of law, as indeed do British war criminals, and those lawyers who conspire with the British State to commit murder.
BARONESS AMOS & DAVID MILLIBAND ARE WAR CRIMINALS, WHO HAVE NO CREDIBILITY.
The law abiding...majority will not be lectured to by a ‘coalition’ of lawyers who knowingly gloss over the fact that entire British governments that have included both Baroness Amos and David Milliband are dangerous war criminals, who must be properly held to account for very real war crimes, in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Ignoring the complicity of the...entire British government, in illegal wars of aggression, clearly contrasts with, and makes recent complaints to the ICC, ring...hollow, and sound like just another cheap and distasteful publicity stunt, by lawyers.
Of course, as your ‘coalition’ of ‘lawyers’ prove yet again, like the widely discredited Syrian report in January 2014, ICC ‘prosecutors’ are a selectively feckless bunch of western government stooges themselves.
29.01.2014 SYRIA: NOW THE UNIVERSAL LIE, IS UNIVERSALLY ...EXPOSED.
THE WARS IN AFGHANISTAN & IRAQ ARE ILLEGAL WARS OF AGGRESSION.
Clearly the wars of aggression in both Afghanistan and Iraq are and were illegal.
It is obviously illegal to impose ‘collective punishment’, which is what occupations and wars are, on entire populations, when the real objective is and always has been, financial gain, for a very violent, and murderous few, in western governments, and big business.
Two MP’s, Nicholas Soames who works for Aegis and Alan Duncan who works for Vitol Oil, serve only as two obvious examples of politicians who are placemen, very substantially profiting from, continuing illegal wars of aggression.
MI6 LIBYAN MILITARY COUP.
Alan Duncan MP had 'spent a lot of money' as prison staff pointed out, having me illegally imprisoned in April 2008, in his failed efforts, to cover up his continuing financial connections with Vitol Oil, who illegally overthrew the Libyan government, in the MI6 military coup, Duncan directly orchestrated in 2011.
01.09.2011 MI6 SECRET OIL TEAM IN LIBYA.
02.09.2011 ALAN DUNCAN RAN SECRET MI6 OPERATION WITH VITOL OIL TO OVERTHROW LIBYAN GOVERNMENT.
No prizes for guessing I was illegally imprisoned in August & September 2011, when that came out.
There are no ‘moderate’ opposition figures such as the Hazzm Movement, who can lawfully be armed in Syria, by the Obama administration, and it’s allies, because all armed opposition in Syria, is illegal, because it is warfare, which is deadly.
worshiping a 'god' called...money.
The only God the recently configured ‘Hazzm Movement’ worship is a the western god called...money.
It is an affront to all decent and civilized people the world over, that any ‘coalition’ of lawyers would dare to publicly suggest that Baroness Ashton [Amos] (same really) has any credibility or interest in human...life.
As Libya proved, British government ‘aid and international development’ money is really used by the British government’s MI6 and the likes of Vitol Oil, to illegally overthrow other...governments, purely for...financial gain.
David Milliband who is likewise a widely discredited war criminal, is not now fronting a genuine western ‘aid’ agency.
It is obscene that any ‘aid’ agency would invite a mass murderer to front them.
It is observed that if any or all of the signatories to the letter genuinely cared about protecting or saving human life, they would have formed a ‘coalition’ of lawyers, to put the...British government on...trial, and behind bars, for what are illegal wars of aggression, a very long time ago.
Unlike me, none of your 'coalition' has been disrupted by being kidnapped 48 times, by the British government.
After all, everyone has ‘locus standii’ to be law abiding.
Your ‘coalition’ of lawyers know that the illegal Balfour Declaration of 1917, intended to begin what has long been a continuing Genocide in the Middle East.
The Balfour Declaration of 1917 was the illegal agreement between the British government and the Zionist Federation, to commit what is a continuing Genocide in the Middle East.
THE ‘COALITION’ OF LAWYERS KNOW THE U.S KILL LISTS & DRONES ARE ABSOLUTELY UNLAWFUL.
The fact that your ‘coalition’ do NOT even seek a simple court order despite the fact the U.S Drone Kill Lists (and the involvement of the British government in drone warfare) are illegal, because as you well know, unfettered power is absolutely unlawful, reveals that your ‘coalition’ are at best gatekeepers of a very sick system.
16.04.2014 FAO CIA DIRECTOR: UNFETTERED POWER IS ABSOLUTELY UNLAWFUL.
all that is needed is a court order confirming that unfettered power is absolutely unlawful.
The signatories, to the Guardian letter, have like the British government, and their media propagandists, lost touch with reality, that is regulated by the rule of law, that exists to protect life.
BINDMANS (BIRNBERG PIERCE & BIRDS) SOLICITORS ARE COMPLICIT IN INHUMAN AND & DEGRADING TREATMENT & ATTEMPTED MURDER.
Our campaign remains confident, that a jury of the people, will agree with us, in our own groundbreaking High Court cases, that the British government (working with the likes of Bindmans Solicitors), have only ever illegally attempted to violently smash our own entirely lawful campaign -because- the British government are committing war crimes, while knowingly engaging in illegal wars of aggression, that are continuing a pattern of Genocide.
kidnap...always trying to...disappear...the messengers.
In fact, Bindmans Solicitors have a considerable track record of unlawfully conspiring to conceal much, incl. CCTV evidence of the British government torturing and attempting to murder me using positional asphyxiation in Belgravia Police Station on September 3rd & 4th 2009.
I only survived that very serious attempt on my life, because the British government and Bindmans Solicitors could not explain away two deaths at the same time, in police custody. The late Brian Haw was also illegally being held in ‘police custody’ at the same time, as myself, and he heard the police acting illegally.
While I was demanding the CCTV, and Bindmans were illegally refusing to obtain it, Bindmans conspired with the British government to kidnap me off the street, on October 7th 2009, with a fraudulent warrant, to try and silence me.
On that occasion the intervention of Steve Jago saved my life.
For Bindmans (for example), to suggest that they are part of a ‘coalition’ of leading ‘experts’ in (human rights) law is both obviously untrue, and repugnant.
Bindmans Solicitors are very dangerous frauds who horse-trade, over people’s lives, to make as much money, as they can, for themselves.
The partners of Bindmans, including Geoffrey Bindman, Steve Grosz, Mike Schwarz, John Halford, Paul Ridge and Chez Cotton, who all sought to cover each others backs, should expect to be struck off, for conspiring with the British government, in attempted murder, and much else.
In fact, the evidence proves, it was the genuine efforts of our own campaign, as law abiding people, that Bindmans, along with other British ‘law’ firms sought to frustrate, that led to the repeal of fraudulent legislation the British government invented to illegally use state violence against our campaign.
Bindmans dishonestly conceded, in a case that did not include me, that fraudulent legislation was compatible with the Human Rights Act, (see below). It is evidenced that I did not concede, (and I was correct and had a barristers written opinion from Alisdair McKenzie at Doughty Chambers to back me up)...which is why I was not notified of the kangaroo court below, where legal representation had been illegally refused.
Lawyers are at very serious fault in not challenging what has become a mountain of illegal legislation that has nothing to do with the rule of law and identifiable harms, and everything to do with illegally trying make money out of controlling people, through state violence, including murder.
Tucker v Director of Public Prosecutions  EWHC 3019 (Admin) (30 November 2007)
Lord Justice Thomas: “It is right to point out that in Blum very experienced counsel, instructed on behalf of numerous persons including Liberty, made a concession in relation to the applicability of Articles 10 and 11 in relation to Section 132 and abandoned an argument that the section should be read down. That concession is not made in this case.”
When you compare how staggeringly different, the British government's ridiculous claim that it was not a breach of Article 11 (freedom of association), to need/be refused the 'permission' of the British government to campaign with Brian, to the British governments words and actions over their own armed opposition, in Libya, Syria and Kiev, it shows just how effective our campaign is.
Of course where there is no power of arrest or seizure under the Public Order Act 1986, because there is no identifiable...harm, there is and was, no ‘power’ of ‘arrest’ or ‘seizure’ under ss132-138 SOCPA 2005 (repealed) or ss141-150 Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011, either.
In legal terms, Bindmans Solicitors are one of a number of British Law firms who are only ‘experts’ in...fraud, and much worse.
By the time the massive police raid in Parliament Square on January 16th 2012, happened, there were a number of British 'law' firms, including Bindmans Solicitors, who (as email dated January 17th 2012 shows) were working with the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police and the British Home Secretary, who all really did, and do, want me dead.
The purpose of the illegal seizure on January 16th 2012, that we could not be and were not prosecuted over, was deliberately designed to subject our campaign to inhuman and degrading treatment, that put our lives at risk, without any shelter.
Yet, if you are part of a CIA or MI6 coup in Kiev, or Syria, or Libya, you can have...whatever you like, no questions asked, that is paid for by money that has been stolen from people by western governments to make more money for big business.
There is a simple reason your ‘coalition’ of unscrupulous ‘lawyers’ are silent about the British government kidnapping law abiding members of the public, like us off the street, using secret police that use numbers, like 666, (which is not really the same as 999) when we go to court.
It is clear that when I made a number of Applications in the British High Court on April 8th 2013, in my claims, that exposed the British government have no recognized defence, to any of our claims, that the British Establishment went into meltdown and sent in secret police on April 10th 2013, to kidnap us, to try and prevent our ever being able to safely attend court.
You can hear what are secret police because they are led by 666, first provocatively claiming dishonestly as you would know, that they had a warrant for Neil failing to appear over an alleged breach of the peace, that never happened, and which lawyers know does not result in a court appearance, in England, anyway
When this is being questioned, and they obviously have no answers, they just kidnap Neil, without having been able to dream up any conceivable grounds to kidnap me, while they know that what I am saying on my phone in a call is being recorded. When they have to produce a warrant at the police station, they just fraudulently fill in one themselves that is nevertheless invalid !!
The British government conspired with Birds Solicitors, who did not go to the police station, because otherwise Neil would have to be released. Of course it was all thrown out of court, but those responsible for his kidnap, are not yet behind bars.
It is revelatory that the first thing out of my supposedly own lawyers mouth, in the court cells in 2012, during one of the 48 times I was kidnapped by the British government, was not about the supposed ‘case’ or the fact that I had been injured, but a complaint !! by the lawyer I had never laid eyes on before, that members of our campaign, recorded what ‘lawyers’ said too !!
That very same lawyer actually tried to refuse giving me a pencil !! in court cells, so I could write a quick ‘defence’ to put on the court record, before the Judge refused to let me finish writing my one paragraph defence, by quickly throwing that bogus case out, because I had not been brought before the court within twenty four hours.
Clearly the point of the whole exercise, in legal 'gymnastics'...is always state violence, because on that occasion five ‘custody’ sergeants just happened along at Charing Cross Police Station, to suddenly argue the toss with me over my not having had...access to a lawyer, before being dragged off to court.
One of the huge thugs went crimson in the face, before lunging forward and grabbing me around the neck as he tried to throttle me, before dragging me violently downstairs, by...the neck. While there were shocked expressions on the faces of others present, no-one did anything to protect me, because they only all cover each others cowardly backs.
In 2011, I was very violently assaulted by private security, while handcuffed, in the court cells at the old Horseferry Road Magistrates -because- I demanded access to a lawyer.
Prior to Neil’s kidnap after we left the High Court on April 10th 2013, Neil had already been violently kidnapped and seriously injured on December 8th 2012, when police kidnapped him, because he was in the High Court on December 6th 2012, when he witnessed my making it clear I was not going to settle out of court, and a jury trial of the British government was agreed.
On December 8th 2012, Neil was kidnapped when police ignored the EU directive that says you cannot stop (let alone seize) EU registered vehicles solely for an insurance ‘check’ (where Neil even had his valid insurance details with a 24/7 phone number on him, that was shown to all the police).
REFORMING A FAR FROM LEGAL SYSTEM, TO SAVE...LIVES.
Our law abiding purpose remains to ‘reform’ what is a far from legal system, to save EVERYONE’S...lives.
QE2’s far from legal system in the U.K, that has been brutally imposed throughout much of the world, including a far from ‘Common-wealth’ that your ‘coalition’ of ‘lawyers’ support, can be transformed into a real system of justice, quite simply.
All proceedings, in Britain involving the actions of public officials, can and must lawfully be, recorded and published, by the law abiding...majority of people.
This will remove the current ‘editorial control’ over the rule of law by the British government, their media propagandists, and murderous ‘coalitions’ of lawyers such as yourselves.
Western media propagandists have quite properly, been widely condemned by the law abiding...majority around the world, over their wall to wall propaganda over Syria and Ukraine, that includes your disgraceful letter.
misses the bit about legal representation and a trial.
District Judge Snow: “If anybody here is in possession of any recording equipment and uses them, they will immediately be charged with contempt and sent to prison”
This case involving District Judge Snow at Westminster Magistrates Money Launderette, that the British Attorney General illegally censored in the U.K, without any court order, is illustrative of our point.
The words ‘charged and imprisoned’, proves that British ‘judges’ will illegally imprison, entirely...law abiding people, by illegally denying them even legal representation or a trial -because- we are trying to save...lives.
It is notable that there is an unresolved 2008, Habeas Corpus Application in the High Court against this very same Judge, and Holloway Prison, for illegally imprisoning me without legal representation or trial, in 2008, which happened to me again in 2011, with District Judge Nicholas Evans, also of Westminster Magistrates Money Launderette.
British Magistrates Courts are by and large the engine room of a massive financial fraud designed to do away with trial by a jury of...law abiding people, over the few common laws, where there is identifiable harm.
It is no co-incidence that the AULD REPORT of September 2001, highlights that most British legislation is at best, a civil matter.
27.05.2013: SEPTEMBER 2001: A GOOD MONTH TO BURY "AULD"...LAW
All the signatories to the Guardian letter, are complicit in, trying to prevent the far larger law abiding...majority of people, that we are a part of, from upholding...law, to protect life, and properly holding the murderous British government to account for war crimes.
Just my groundbreaking High Court claims, would -legally- bring down the British government.
It was always the most perverse ‘abuse of process’, for the British government and the many layers of their far from legal system, including lawyers, like yourselves, who are involved in mass murder, to try and make it a criminal offence for people to be...law abiding.
Parliament Square Peace Campaign
HQ11X00563 Counterclaim: The British government have no recognized defence to a claim they had to withdraw because they had no evidence to bring it.
HQ12X01972: The British government knew they had no recognized defence, when Asst. Commissioner Allison knowingly filed a fraudulent witness statement on 12.12.2012, in the High Court, that failed to include the fact he admitted in Parliament in June 2008, that the British government had no power of seizure in Parliament Square on May 23rd 2006.
HQ12X02745: The British government have no recognized defence to in the words of the CPS, having ‘illegally charged’ me, knowing there was no evidence, over malicious prosecutions, I won.
The British government have no recognized defence to torture on August 5th 2006.
HQ12X03564: The British government have no recognized defence, to the illegal seizure in Parliament Square, on January 16th 2012, when they knew they could not and did not prosecute our campaign.
The British government have no recognized defence to the use of inhuman and degrading treatment that deliberately intended to put our lives at risk, by illegally denying us shelter.
HQ13X03488: The British government have no recognized defence to torture and attempted murder