EDWARD SNOWDEN HOAX: EXERCISE IN DAMAGE LIMITATION AS NSA COUNSEL "CONFIRMS" GOOGLE & CO. KNEW ABOUT....LEGISLATION. (20.03.2014)

 

There is some legal butt covering going on, over the Edward Snowden Hoax.

 

19.03.2014: US TECH GIANTS KNEW OF NSA DATA COLLECTION AGENCY'S TOP LAWYER INSISTS.

 

 

 

Didn't need to be a lawyer, let alone a top lawyer to spot that one.

 

As we pointed out in June last year, it was obvious that the tech companies knew about the legislation, that was...published.

 

26.06.2013 PRISM HOAX: THE - FACT - THERE IS ILLEGAL LEGISLATION OVER MASS "SURVEILLANCE" IS - NOT - A .....LEAK.

 

19.06.2013 GOOGLE IN CAHOOTS WITH NSA.

 

The latest admission by the NSA counsel still remains somewhat disingenuous, however, since the true position is that the U.S government part own Google via the CIA, so obviously...Google knew, and "co-operated"....entirely, with the government, who part own them.

 

In a legal sense, since Google are part owned by the U.S government, the NSA "counsel" was in essence speaking for Google too, anyway.

 

The so called hearing is a smokescreen.

 

LEGAL POINT OVER PUBLIC OWNERSHIP OF GOVERNMENT...INFORMATION.

 

In terms of documents, we want to know what Greenwald has or does not have, because there is an important legal point to be made.

 

The mainstream media (who -revealingly- are not being prosecuted over their possession and publishing of government information) do not have rights over and above the rest of us to government information (which they are only using for...profit).

 

12.03.2014 EDWARD SNOWDEN HOAX. FAO U.K ATTORNEY GENERAL & GLENN GREENWALD: 21 DAY PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL.

 

Government information is government information, and if Greenwald and Co. are alleging government wrongdoing, which incidentally (or rather revealingly) they did not challenge when they were in the British High Court, then we are -all- entitled to the government information, to make our own decisions and choices, in a timely and informed manner.

 

At the very best, it remains revealed that Greenwald is just in it for the money, using information, that does not belong to just him.

 

Government information is public information.

 

SURVEILLANCE = CENSORSHIP.

 

We do maintain that the true purpose of "surveillance" is....VIOLENT censorship, which happens through both government -and- the mainstream media, maintaining..."editorial...control" over the true facts.

 

:)

 

This is our own very extensive experience, of government and the mainstream media propagandists, which will also have been experienced by many, many others.

 

Omidyar just spent -millions- delivering Greenwald who does not care about the people, as the latest media mouthpiece for multi-millionaires.

 

They really are trying to sell the people a dummy in ever sense of the word.

 

They don't want the little people like you and me actually having a voice anywhere, let alone online :) because it is always...the people who do actually challenge the government asking the questions, while trying to make things better for...the people.

 

Both government and mainstream media are losing their ability thanks to the internet, to selectively -edit- the people to suit their long established, very damaging...world view. 

 

ASKING THE QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO...GOVERNMENT.

 

It is also clear that there is huge scope across the internet, to go beyond merely "reporting" a chosen view etc, to -directly- asking....governments the questions, that really need...asking.

 

Even when governments have no answer, their silence...speaks, and people have the opportunity to know, rather than just being bombarded with...selected...propaganda.

16.06.2013 SYRIA: FAO ATTORNEY GENERAL, FOREIGN SECRETARY, HOME SECRETARY, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

 

25.02.2014: HOLDING BRITISH GOVERNMENT TO ACCOUNT: THE KLITSCHKO EMAILS.

 

19.03.2014: UKRAINE: RESPONSE TO "LEGAL GROUNDS" FROM BRITISH FOREIGN OFFICE.

 

NO COURT ORDERS.

 

It remains that the CIA start up Google illegally censored recordings of our court proceedings in the U.K without any court order, because neither government nor their mainstream media propagandists want the people, to record and publish...the people doing law, in court, to protect people's....lives.

 

 

As most people around the world will be noticing, the rule of law does not loom large on the agenda of western governments, who rely on the soundbite mainstream media propagandists, put out.

 

 

CONCLUSION:

If British courts are opened up to proper scrutiny, by the...people, the knock on effect, to people's lives is...huge.

 

Proper "surveillance" of...government, will lead to proper ....accountability...of government.

 

" In a time of universal deceit, law abiding civilians trying to restore the real democracy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law is an evolutionary act."

 

(adapted from George Orwell)