To be on the safe side, we have specifically stated that we are not part of a separate legal action (that is looking to become a class action) against Google in the U.K which involves pretty much just lining lawyers pockets.


In the U.S the same class action that is now being brought in the U.K was won. What it really involves, is lawyers cynically living off the interest of those who do not collect.

We do not want a narrow argument over "cookies" to derail our bigger and wider argument involving a far from legal landscape of ...violent censorship ...that leads to brutal mass murder.

From: babs tucker
To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
CC: neil kerslake
Subject: RE: Yr Google Class Action.
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 22:00:36 +0000

Dear Sir,

This is just a brief email, simply to notify you and for the avoidance of doubt, that due to the fact of the unsettled nature of class actions, we specifically state that your claim against Google does not include us, nor do you or any other in this claim, act on our behalf.

We have existing High Court civil actions in the U.K involving illegal censorship of our campaign by the U.K Attorney General, Google, the Home Secretary and others, incl: HQ12X01972, HQ12X02745, HQ12X03564, HQ13X03488 & a counterclaim in HQ11X00563.

Kind Regards,

Babs Tucker & Neil Kerslake
Parliament Square Peace Campaign

" In a time of universal deceit, law abiding civilians trying to restore the real democracy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law is an evolutionary act."


(adapted from George Orwell)