COURT OF APPEAL: 2011/0787 & 2011/0788

DAY 3586: MONDAY MARCH 28TH 2011.

I toddled along and filed our Appeals with the Court of Appeal today, and served the copies on the Mayor of London's lawyers. You know how government goes, forms, forms and more forms, go here, go there, etc, etc etc....!!!!

Our skeleton arguments will follow in fourteen days.

We are also in the process of appealing a refusal of legal aid for Brian, (which we found out about on Friday afternoon) because proceedings have gone ahead in his absence, while he is out of the country being treated for cancer.

The BBC suddenly ignored our appeal and carried on with the spin:

BBC: A DIRTY FILTHY GOVERNMENT STITCH UP
BBC: NO PARLIAMENT PEACE CAMP EVICTION BEFORE ROYAL WEDDING.

While UK "HUMAN RIGHTS" BLOG wrote a crap article but there were two notable observations in the comments column.
1. The point of the UK govt. signing up to the Human Rights Act was to erode human rights.
2.
Justice Wyn Williams just went along with some decidedly "ropey at best" reasons for our removal that were dreamt up by the Mayor (a politician)


remember we brought CO/11393/2007 first ?












hmmm...erred n law...facts and evidence -v- "ropey at best ..reasons"....


A witness statement is not a defence statement.


In 2007, the GLA & MET running around after us trying to cover up the illegal seizure etc.....


CO/11393/2007..the illegal seizure on 23rd May 2006.


September 13th - February 28th, a procedural "irregularity".




the govt & press hate peaceful campaigners..they just don't get the headlines they want from them...






"assets seized", now there's a familiar story..... already being played out in.....our claim CO/11393/2007 (over the illegal seizure on 23rd May 2006), that preceded the Mayors and that of Westminster City Council......




Blowjob