Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: Writ of Mandamus with transnational self determination & £10 million pounds compensation (to end abuses of process of adoption, and breaches of non refoulement over exile, caused by BBC et al) (10.01.2021)

 

 

... donna... the reasonable self defence of the peace and harmony of the rule of law, naturally exists every single day to make the world a safer and kinder place for everyone...

 

 

 

 

I was adopted as a small ‘mixed race’ child in Australia and did not choose who adopted me, and repealed ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 as an adult in the UK, because adoptions and ss 132-138 of the Serious Crime and Police Act 2005 (an Enabling Act that maliciously targeted dissent… because it was peaceful) are and were both abuses of process, all of which is not my ‘fault’.

 

The Abuse of Process of Adoptions.

 

The abuse of process of adoptions arbitrarily impose on or remove from vulnerable children isolated from our entire families without due process or legal representation… any identity, religion, nationality, or citizenships, so there are less acknowledged rights, than citizens, immigrants or refugees.

 

The Australian government had a 'show trial' of me as a child saying I wasn't 'allowed' to be (Catalan) Italian which any reasonable and rational responsible adult would know is not only discriminatory, but deeply offensive.

 

The fact is adoption is of itself an abuse of process that is ‘void ab initio’, where I have ‘no case to answer’ because an abuse of process is ’not prescribed by law’.

 

I am telling the truth about the Victorian Ombudsman in Australia who was the IPCC Commissioner in the UK, while I was in Parliament Square Central London, who is... harming me, and only one of the two of us can be telling the truth. 

 

It is self evident I do not, including during a global pandemic, and as an adult, have to pay money to a court or have their permission to have a writ of mandamus to stop the abuse of process of adoptions, and have my own identity so I can make my own informed decisions, because I was a small child and… a minor without any money or legal representation, when the state, brought their malicious prosecution and show trial… against me in Case 352.

 

The Godfather & 1984 in Australia.

 

The man who posed as my godfather who was Director General of ASIO in 1984 obviously…  discriminated against me with adoption legislation in 1984 in Victoria, Australia (the Cain government) because it was not in his or others… financial interests either, for me to have legal representation (I wasn’t even living in Australia) for a writ of mandamus because adoption is of itself an abuse of process (the intelligence services in ‘Whites Only’ Australia, (I guess the bastion of white supremacy is Australia) were spying on Mediterranean Italians and Jews (Menzies, like the BBC Director General Reith, and many others supported Hitler, and Franco who was installed by the Fremantle intelligence services who raised me, was everyones favourite dictator, including at the same time Whitlam was  PM) because only legally reviewable guardianships until adulthood, are legally permissible, which should have global fully comprehensive health and insurance cover because that is genuinely in the best interests of ALL vulnerable children.

 

The people who posed as my parents and godparents from the highest echelons of the British and Australian intelligence services, were obviously involved in the global free for all of the... Hague Adoption Convention too.

 

(I would have obviously gone back to my family who wanted me, if there had only been legally reviewable guardianships, but even if that had not been possible in my case, I would still have only agreed to a legally reviewable guardianship until adulthood because I am not someone else's pet or property. I would have been... hugely relieved if my adoption had transitioned to a legally reviewable guardianship until adulthood when I was a child, and even better with global fully comprehensive health and insurance cover to help try and protect me, and so I didn't have to try and sort out and work through all the lies myself without legal representation because politicians and functionaries have never cared or helped)

 

The British government had originally illegally ordered the destruction of my banner in the UK,… because it said “I am not the serious Organised Criminal” because ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 was RICO legislation (like that made by Nixon during the Vietnam War, that Australia was involved in, when I was… discriminated against as a child during the ‘Whites Only’ era, when being mixed race Mediterranean, was another black mark against you) and bore no relationship to peaceful dissent. 

 

The Original Sin by the BBC in the UK.

 

 

... the original sin... when my name was illegally leaked by the journalism of the BBC, along with false information, that they did know they could never explain to a high court civil jury...

 

 

The abuse of process of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 happened… because the Commissioner of the MET Police in the UK, at New Scotland Yard, and the BBC illegally leaked my adopted name along with information they both knew to be false, on Mothers Day 26 March 2006 they did know they could never explain to a High Court jury, because that was when the legislation should have ended, that they wanted to continue.

 

 

... steve j was there too...

 

It is legally irrelevant what the government said... after Mothers Day because they knew everything they said and did was a lie.

 

(The fact some people didn’t care about the abuse of process of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005, which had to be repealed, just like some people don’t care about the abuse of process of adoption doesn’t change an abuse of process is illegal. The abuse of process of adoption is racketeering really)

 

... i was illegally imprisoned twice in 2008 and 2011 without legal representation or trial... because i didn't give the bbc a licence to lie about me on mothers day... while the city of london lawyer refused without lawful excuse to hand over to me the cctv that belongs to me, of the torture and attempted murder of me...

 

The BBC is a… global corporation who sends the public to prison for not paying them a licence fee, but the BBC and it’s Director General Mark Thomson who later went to the NY Times, had no licence to lie about me. The legal reality is everything that happened to me, in the UK, while I was in Parliament Square, Central London, after that ‘original sin’ by the BBC, including 48 unlawful ‘arrests’ (when the media obviously never supported our repeal of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 either) and the torture and attempted murder of me, was intended to cover up what the BBC did know they could never defend having published, before any High Court civil jury.

 

The Victorian Ombudsman in Australia, who was the former IPCC (now IPOC) Commissioner in the UK while I was in Parliament Square, Central London, along with other Australian state functionaries like the Alstons, formerly the Australian Ambassador in London at that time, while another was a UN Rapporteur of something or other, when by contrast everyone was…  discriminating against me, including by dishonestly saying… I was not a (natural born) Australian citizen.

 

... the victorian ombudsman and former IPCC (now IOPC) Commissioner has always known the bbc lied on mothers day 2006, which is why they had their meeting on 8th december 2006...

 

The BBC were directly involved in illegally editing and publishing audio prior to a State Opening, in 2010, they could only have been given by the police or special branch, that was about distracting from their original sin and the torture and attempted murder of me, including the City of London email sent to me, no-one would be ever able to explain to a civil jury.

 

... the bbc (who illegally edited and published audio given to them by the MET police) were (along with the MET and the IPCC) trying to cover up mothers day 2006, which is the real story in every way really (and there was the cctv of the torture and attempted murder of me by then)...

 

 

It is a legal impossibility to argue that what happened was not politically motivated because Johnson et al were maliciously prosecuting me while illegally refusing to hand over the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, that involved the ‘original sin’ by BBC.

 

... the government, bbc, and city of london lawyer didnt even want a high court jury to see this email, let alone the cctv of the torture and attempted murder of me, that obviously... belongs to me... that is directly linked to mothers day...

 

(I remember, afterI was exiled from the UK, I was followed into a lift by a journalist from the BBC, when I was in Hanover in Germany, and he tried to start a conversation with me, in English, that I just ignored, before I got out of the lift on the next floor)

 

... its a legal impossibility to deny it isn't all entirely politically motivated because the bbc hid they lied over legislation that was repealed because it was an abuse of process, while johnson et al (including the victorian ombudsman) have profited !! by refusing without lawful excuse to hand over the cctv to me, that belongs to me, of their torture and attempted murder of me, while i was a private citizen who had my adopted name illegally leaked with false information (and i am not a journalist or ambassador in any embassy)...

 

 

... bbc director general reith supported hitler, which is not really surprising given aryan 'whites only' australia, which has continued so long after world war two... 

 

 

It’s obviously not okay when a massive global corporation… publicly names and lies about a… private citizen, (who has no legal representation) and with the intention of harming that person, who the government then torture and attempt to murder and is exiled.

 

 

... habeas corpus... the bbc are responsible for the habeas corpus case too...

 

The global BBC profited from not having to front up before a High Court civil jury, anywhere, and explain their ‘original sin’ that caused me sooooooooooooooooo much physical and emotional harm.

 

... bbc & foxtel... the revolving doors..

 

The Victorian Ombudsman and former IPCC Commissioner in the UK and Victorian Health Commissioner and former lawyer for the baby snatching Royal Women’s Hospital in Carlton have illegally refused without lawful excuse to… record the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK, because it is not in their… personal financial interests to do so, which is why I was also illegally detained in hotel quarantine, by the DHHS they oversee, which had nothing to do with… my health, and everything to do with the fact, it is not and never will be in their… personal financial interests for me to be in my own home in Australia, France or the UK.

 

 

... this illegal hotel quarantine at 750 bourke street, that actually went on longer etc, has nothing to do with anyone caring about my physical or emotional health, and everything to do, with the personal financial interests of the victorian ombudsman (who oversees the dhhs, who along with the victorian ombudsman and doj are all at 570 bourke street) who covered up about the bbc on mothers day 2006 etc, which is the only reason i am not in my own home in australia france or the uk...

 

It would be a legal impossibility for either to claim they care about the public’s… health, because it is a matter of fact, they only record whatever suits their own… personal financial interests, which does not make them fit and proper public officials to oversee a public vaccine program.

 

... the victorian ombudsman ... overseeing her own cover-up...at dhhs et al who like public officials who are ambassadors and rapporteurs falsely claim they have legal immunity from... the public, which they do know is untrue... 

 

No child should ever be expected to please the needs of any adult in the ‘make believe’ fairy tale world of adoption still only really being sold by the British monarch et al's UN cult of celebrity, because legally reviewable guardianships with fully comprehensive health and insurance cover until adulthood will genuinely protect the best interests of ALL vulnerable children. An adult who is as a guardian caring and respectful towards a child, will build a lasting bond into adulthood that does not need to include… ownership of another person as an… adult.

 

The UN cult of celebrity who are 'state actors' living in a 'state of denial' should be supporting legally reviewable guardianships until adulthood with global fully comprehensive health and insurance cover to genuinely help protect the best interests of the child instead of adoption which does have a stigma...  because it is an abuse of process that causes harm:

 

 

... the un cult of celebrity are cynically... prejudiced towards adopted people having errr... legal representation... to stop the abuse of process of adoption...

 

I am obviously as a peacenik and mum, who stood in a Public Square open to speaking with anyone from anywhere around the world as an equal, for a very many years, completely different from the UN cult of celebrity who are literally state actors because they are given… government funding !! in… the knowledge legal representation is being illegally denied to adopted people… because adoption is an abuse of process.

 

 

... the australian government paying the un cult of celebrity, which hides the british and australian far from 'commonwealth' governments have always stopped me as a... child and adult, living in my own home in australia, the uk and france, because of the hague adoption convention...

 

The 'make believe' world of 'noble cause' adoption has always pretended that abuse never happens or happened to... adopted children.

 

The UN cult of celebrity who don't care about the harm adoption has caused, obviously do not genuinely care about vulnerable children, who are just being treated as a commodity to satisfy the needs of adults.

 

The legal reality is the transition from adoption to legally reviewable guardianships until adulthood with global fully comprehensive health and insurance cover means people who have had any identity and citizenship imposed on us, have the right to transnational self determination (including in cases like mine involving non refoulement and where my identity was changed from Australian Italian etc to British Australian etc etc) so we can make our own choices about citizenships (in a world where citizenships are also sold) according to our circumstances. 

 

The Victorian Ombudsman in Australia and former IPCC (now called IOPC) Commissioner in the UK, is illegally stopping me living in my own home in Australia, France or the UK:

 

 

 

 

... my own modest home i adore in my nature lovers paradise in france that has the most amazing symphony of birdsong i have ever heard in my life... 

 

I have always been a private citizen horrifically abused in transnational miscarriages of justice, because I am an adopted person and was a single divorced working mum who was blacklisted and lost my paid employment as a healthcare worker and (resigned as local chair of a nationwide bereavement charity, and was previously a chair of governors of a primary school) and had to sell my home in the UK, because I was in Parliament Square, Central London, before being exiled, because of Mother Day 2006, and stopped from living in my own home which is a modest stone cottage in my nature lovers paradise in France.

 

So yes, it is a serious problem that the Victorian Ombudsman (who oversees the DHHS & DOJ) who was the former IPCC (now called IPOC) Commissioner in the UK while I was in Parliament Square, Central London is... profiting from my suffering. 

 

 

... the apologias from politicians and their functionaries including from the highest echelons of the british & australian intelligence services, who didn't 'allow' me to be italian etc (which is precisely what they were trying to 'change' which is deeply offensive) were obviously never sincere... because of course they were all involved in the global free for all of the hague adoption convention too... 

 

The... reality that politicians and their functionaries do not care about and have never cared about adopted children or adults, who have never been protected because adoption is an abuse of process, means there needs to be legally reviewable guardianships until adulthood with global fully comprehensive health and insurance cover so the best interests of vulnerable children really are protected. 

 

The politicians and functionaries are still the obstacle in the way of progress in care for vulnerable children, in the here and now, because they haven't genuinely addressed their previous 'failures'.

 

... while i was in parliament square, central london... they were all obviously very much NOT sorry, and nor is the global free for all of the hague adoption convention...

  

So my own choice is to be based in Gibraltar on the Mediterranean, (the Australian government and their functionaries are only making my prolonged PTSD worse) with an Australian citizenship, and four United States Green cards, although I don't have to live in the United States, along with £10 million pounds compensation so I can get on with... my own life and come and go from Australia if and when I want, and visit my own home in France, without being bullied by politicians and their functionaries who have only tried to... harm my physical and emotional health.  

 

 

Kind Regards,

 

 

 

Donna Bugat

(formerly known as Babs Tucker)