Donna Bugat:  Australian PM’s political 'AHPPC' pontificating, is legally meaningless, because politicians abuse of process of adoptions falsely claim adopted people need to pay courts & have their permission for identity & information to try & make informed decisions incl. during a global pandemic (06.01.2020)

 

 

... donna... the reasonable self defence of the peace and harmony of the rule of law, naturally exists, to make the world a safer and kinder place for the benefit of everyone...

 

 

 

 

... it's a legal certainty i am claiming £10 million pounds from high court order over the abuse of process of ss 132-138 socpa 2005, now repealed, that replicates the same legal issues as the county court adoption order in melbourne in the british and australian revolving doors between politicians, news media and bureaucrats et al (ie: the offices of the victorian ombudsman and health commissioner) ...

 

 

 

... this is... legally meaningless political pontificating... because politicians abuse of process of adoptions falsely claim adopted people need 'permission' of courts to have our identity and information to make informed decisions, which a global pandemic confirms as blatantly untrue...

 

 

... AHPPC ?... it's... already a legal certainty adopted people don't need to pay or have the permission of the AHPPC to stop the abuse of process of adoptions and have our own identities and information so we can make informed decisions...

 

 

The legal reality is adopted people have the absolute right to the self determination of having our own identity and information at no financial cost to ourselves, so we can try and make informed decisions, about our physical and emotional health.

 

The adoptions are an abuse of process and only legally reviewable guardianships until adulthood are legally permissible, where the government have a duty of care to provide global fully comprehensive health and insurance cover to vulnerable children isolated from their families, because that is a practical step that can actually help protect vulnerable children.

 

Kind Regards,

 

 

Donna Bugat

(formerly known as Babs Tucker)

 

Related:

 

Donna Bugat: My High Court Order for £10 million pounds from ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 abuse of process, gives me voluntary unpaid oversight of transition from universal deceit of adoptions to self determination of legally reviewable guardianships with global