Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: I… consent to immediate commencement of enforcement action by Magistrates Court in Melbourne, against Victorian State & Federal Parliament politicians to recover long overdue compensation of $100,000 from each and every single one from my ‘void ab initio’ of their crime of ‘adoption’ (09.12.2020)

 

 

... donna... the reasonable self defence of the peace and harmony of the rule of law, that naturally exists for the benefit of everyone...

 

 

 

___________

 

I… consent to immediate enforcement action by the Magistrates Court in Melbourne, against Victorian State and Federal Parliament politicians publicly funded salaries, to recover long overdue compensation of $100,000 dollars from each and every single politician, totalling around $15 million dollars.

 

Any failure to begin immediate enforcement action against politicians who are not entitled to any publicly funded legal representation, without immediately providing any legal grounds in writing by email to me, will result in a listing for a jury, and a court order politicians are in contempt of court, and should be imprisoned and their entire salaries claimed as compensation, which will still all result in my ‘void ab initio’ of 'adoption'.

 

________

 

Notes:

 

It is absolutely unconscionable for politicians to use their mob rule against an innocent and defenceless child, alone and isolated through no fault of their own from their entire family, without any legal grounds.

 

I already know (& have always consistently provided incontrovertible and uncontested evidence) Victorian State & Federal politicians would use…

 

… theft of my identity while I was a child and adult isolated from my own entire family without any legal grounds, along with any personal property including my own home, while being blacklisted from paid employment, along with repeated violent and life threatening assaults, torture, attempted murder, by politicians own known and unknown assailants (and including politicians themselves) along with starvation and exile and so on and so forth improperly using the entire state apparatus….

 

… Australia… and elsewhere like the UK for no other reason than to avoid politicians paying compensation from their own publicly funded salaries as politicians for my ‘void ab initio’ of the crime of adoption, because I have of course always been legally entitled to just lawfully and peacefully be who… I am.

 

Politicians have always had every reasonable opportunity to appear before a jury in a timely manner, but they have always known they have never had any recognised defence in law to even put before any jury.

 

Politicians never had a ‘reasonable excuse’ for always failing to obtain consent from minors and adopted adults to our ‘adoption’.

 

The politicians did always know they had no insurance cover for the wholly arbitrary and disproportionate interference etc of ‘adoption’ because there never has been any legitimate aim convincingly established in the reasonable self defence of the peace and harmony of the rule of law, which is substantially different from the socially constructed opportunistic and exploitative legislative ‘activism’ of biased and prejudiced cronyism etc

 

Kind Regards,

 

 

Donna Bugat

(formerly known as Babs Tucker)

 

Related:

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: I… consent to my ‘void ab initio’ of crime of adoption that failed to obtain my consent as a minor or adult, to begin global conversion to healthier more inclusive guardianships & new ‘Hague Guardianship Convention for others (09.12.2020)

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: I am an adopted person and Sh’Amnesty’ International shills don’t speak for or instead of me, because adoption is a crime (09.12.2020)