Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: I am fully qualified Magistrate (declaring conditional amnesty over my former adoption) so I am new 'test case' launching first legitimate global trial in Melbourne of universal health & welfare package that safely... transcends political, religious & cultural landscapes (05.12.2020)
... my name is donna...
A child is not a product who can be cruelly traded on global markets for the benefit of anyone else.
I am a fully qualified Magistrate (declaring a conditional amnesty over my former adoption) so I am a new 'test case' who can launch the first legitimate global trial in Melbourne of a universal health & welfare package that can set a new 'gold standard' that safely... transcends political, religious & cultural landscapes.
It is obviously in everyone's best interests to agree to launch the first legitimate global trial of a universal health and welfare package in Melbourne, that could only be positive.
The adoption of a child happens through no fault of our own and being adopted is not of itself a crime, so no adopted person should be routinely treated worse than a criminal convicted of the worst crimes or a soldier sent armed into a battlefield for a limited time.
The fact, adopted children and adults come from... all walks of life from... all around the world, means we are as a now protected… group which we should always have been, literally best placed to participate in the first legitimate global trial of a universal health and welfare package that sets a new 'gold standard' that safely... transcends political, religious or cultural landscapes, who can all be constructively involved.
The universal health and welfare package could then swiftly be extended out to other groups of people.
The reason I am able to oversee the first legitimate global trial of a universal health and welfare package is because I am beyond any reasonable doubt fully qualified as a Magistrate, through my however anyone looks at it, unprecedented ‘lived experience’ as a universal adopted person, mum and peacenik, who has personally always refused to consent to my own adoption, so I am from that particular group of adopted refuseniks in a global political, religious and cultural landscape that has legally been completely compromised by the arbitrary practise of adoption that has never had any child protection policies that put the best interests of the child… first.
The legal reality is there have never been any legal grounds for an adoption without the proof of consent from a child, and indeed anyone who genuinely respected a child and the child’s best interests would obviously find it equally rewarding being a guardian if that is what a child consented to, instead of adoption.
It is clearly sensible to have the first legitimate trial of my universal health and welfare package in the transition to the use of more affordable clean renewable energy increasing, that simultaneously redresses the issues of governments legal liability arising from the failure to have proof of consent from adopted children and adults.
The reality is there really is only… unlimited potential in equality of… opportunity for everyone.
In practise, I would basically be the trusted 'test case'/first point of peaceful contact for the first legitimate global trial of a… universal health and welfare package, who would try and address any legal issues if and as they arise with the best available advice.
All families matter.
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)