Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: In the matter of my peaceful & healthy empowering freedom of expression with my universal injunction to stop global crime against humanity of forced ‘adoptions’ which are ‘collective punishment’  (04.11.2020)

 

 

... my name is donna...

 

IN THE MATTER OF MY PEACEFUL & HEALTHY, EMPOWERING FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION WITH MY INJUNCTION TO STOP GLOBAL CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY OF FORCED 'ADOPTIONS" WHICH ARE 'COLLECTIVE PUNISHMENT' CASE 352                                                                                                                                                  

 

 

 

I was born in Carlton, Melbourne, in the State of Victoria, where I was raised by the highest echelons of the British and Australian intelligence services who posed as my parents and godparents to forcibly change my identity without my informed consent as either a child or adult.

 

The intelligence services who raised me… contacted me, when I was originally in Parliament Square, Central London, in the UK, to inform me, the British government would not ’allow’ me to exercise my peaceful freedom of expression which is of itself healthy and empowering, compared to the traditional state hierarchy of a power structure based solely on the cronyism of false profits above all else.

 

They admitted I wasn’t doing anything illegal before they added the British police had a ‘bad reputation’.

 

 

... the original malicious prosecution in the UK, to 'make an example' of me 'pour les autres' (to deter others)...

 

 

... the repeal of the 'anti-competition' free speech ban in the uk...

 

We never spoke again, because they did know I was only being maliciously targeted to ‘make an example’ of me ’pour les autres’, because I am ‘adopted’ and… they were completely compromised.

 

The United Nations do know it is criminally negligent, for any state to continue with a forced ‘adoption’ that in not having the informed consent of an adopted child or adult, means that adopted person is unable to give their inextricably linked informed consent for any healthcare.

 

It is self evident, a forced ‘adoption’ by any state, is the seriously abusive and harmful opposite of any healthcare.

 

... the collective punishment of forced 'adoption' which is a crime against humanity...

 

All adopted children and adults have the absolute right to discharge our adoptions including through the use of injunctions, because there are other care options for adopted children, while adopted adults have an absolute right to an injunction or discharge of our adoptions.

 

The only unlawful reasons I do not currently have my injunction to stop my forced ‘adoption’ is because the entire state apparatus a) who have never been independent arbiters, b) do not want to admit liability themselves for the very real physical and emotional harm they have always known is caused by forced ‘adoptions’.

 

 

 

... the same westminster system refuses without lawful excuse to keep accurate and contemporaneous records, because it doesn't want to admit liability...

 

It is a legal impossibility in my international case, to deny I am physically and emotionally harmed by my forced ‘adoption’ that I have never given my informed consent to as either a child or adult.

 

 

... there needs to be adopted person led reform, rather than a seriously anomalous quango ...

 

The ‘Hague Convention on Intercountry adoption’ run by an unelected quango whose ‘Secretary General’ is appointed by the Foreign Office in the Netherlands, ignores the legal reality that it is entirely natural, that most of the ‘homogenous’ group called… humanity, which includes adopted people, first and foremost live within the peace and harmony of the rule of law.

 

... the 'collective punishment' of forced 'adoptions' are a crime against humanity... there are no legal, civil, criminal or other sanctions that can be imposed on an 'adopted' person anywhere, because we refuse to recognise our 'adoption'... 

 

 

The global crime of forced ‘adoptions’ means the more recent ICC in it’s current form, does not genuinely reflect the peace and harmony of the rule of law either, because it also ’sidesteps’ the legal reality that the absence of the explicit universal right of all adopted people to give our informed consent to our adoption or an injunction to stop our own adoption, is ‘collective punishment’ because humanity is legally a ‘homogenous’ group, regardless of race, religion and nationality.

 

I am as a person with the lived experience of ‘adoption’ an ‘independent arbiter’ simply because I do recognise the universal right of adopted children and adults to have the option of giving our own informed consent to our adoption, or an injunction to stop our ‘adoption’ because it harms our physical and/or emotional health.

 

The legal reality is an adopted person, in a global world of increasing social mobility, outside racial or religious reasons, also has the universal legal right to choose our own place of residence, ‘habitual’ or otherwise, that includes our own universal health and welfare package, regardless of wherever we choose to live.

 

The fact that all the states and countries involved in ‘adoption’ have so comprehensively failed in their most basic ‘duty of care’ to seek informed consent for adoption, from adopted children and adults, means that because all states are legally obliged to prove beyond all reasonable doubt they have the informed consent of adopted children and adults, there must be mandatory reporting of forced ‘adoptions’ because forced ‘adoption’ is a very serious identifiable crime.

 

My own universal health and welfare package, includes a) eligibility to receive social security from the Australian government regardless of where I choose to I live in Australia or elsewhere b) $3 million dollars compensation from the State of Victoria, along with c) the State of Victoria, paying the ‘excess’ costs of any global annual health and insurance policy I choose, that comes with legal representation.

 

The State of Victoria is legally obliged to register a court stamped copy of my injunction to stop my 'adoption' which will be publicly available upon request from the County Court in Melbourne, with the 'Central Authorities' in Australia, the UK, France, Italy, Spain and New Zealand, along with the 'Secretary General' of the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoptions in the Netherlands.

 

... formerly known as babs tucker...