Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: Australian (fmr) Labour PM Kevin Rudd’s $1.4 billion dollar Tory UK contracts laundered through wife’s company to cover up torture & attempted murder of me… because I am legally entitled to universal injunction to stop ‘adoption’  (27.10.2020)

 

 

... my name is donna...

 

 

 

 

 

I was raised by the highest echelons of the British and Australian intelligence services who posed as my parents and godparents in the ‘adoption’ assimilation ‘experiment’ I have never given my informed consent to as either a child or adult.

 

The published legal records in the UK, when I was actively repealing the ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 free speech ban there (that included arbitrary ‘conditions’ imposed to try and limit us to 20 people within 3 metres that were proven to be ‘unworkable’ and therefore unlawful) prove the lifelong ‘bureaucrat’ and former Australian Labour PM (who like his far from 'humanitarian' wife, are certainly not ‘victims’ of Murdoch) was specifically recruited to be the Australian PM in 2007, to try and hide the political classes et al knew I am legally entitled to an injunction to stop my ’adoption’ along with compensation.

 

It all began to unravel in the High Court in the UK in April 2008, when I got a High Court Order, and then again in the High Court on 21st June 2010, when everyone tried to 'overtake' my High Court Order, which is why I was then illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010, while Rudd switched from being the PM in Australia to the Foreign Minister, because he was trying to cover up the records at DFAT which include witnesses in the UK, that directly implicate him in the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK.

 

The charlatan Rudd with his $1.2 billion dollar Tory UK government contracts (part of the ‘zero hours contracts’ racket) along with Johnson (who was Mayor of London then) and Starmer (who was the DPP then) were always working together to cover up the torture and attempted murder of me (the CCTV exists) precisely because they did always know I am legally entitled to a universal injunction to stop my ‘adoption’  along with compensation.

 

The fact my universal injunction to stop my adoption, along with compensation, can’t change what has already happened, can however help stop it continuing, and protect other ‘adopted’ people from unscrupulous racketeers like Rudd et al.

 

My injunction to stop my 'adoption' highlights of itself what a fraud Rudd is, along with other politicians and their crocodile tears over 'forced adoption' while I was in Parliament Square in Central London !! and they had illegal access to personal information they profited from, before I was exiled to France, which Rudd directly profited from too. 

 

It is self evident, the only self serving opposition, politicians et al have, to injunctions from adopted people to stop forced 'adoptions' is because the 'experiments' were always intended to be forced 'assimilation'. 

 

I obviously did not ever 'apply' or pay to be ‘adopted’ so it is self evident, I do not have to pay any ‘court fees’ that would have to be waived, for my injunction to stop my ‘adoption’ along with compensation.