Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: Discharge of County Court Order ‘Without Prejudice’ (10.09.2020)

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Justice Department,

 

Thank you for your email sent to me this evening, on behalf of the County Court and Premier Andrews et al.

 

 

I think I am now providing a legally binding document (see below) in my case, that is to the best of my knowledge, and without the benefit of legal representation, a fair and sensible compromise, where legal minor and inconsequential amendments with my knowledge, would of course be accepted.

 

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

 

In the County Court at Melbourne                         Case 352

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE DISCHARGE OF AN ADOPTION

 

by

 

Donna Bugat

 

Date of Document: 10 September 2020

Filed by: Donna Bugat

Prepared by: Donna Bugat

 

1. I hereby notify the County Court that as an adult, I am ‘Without Prejudice’ discharging the County Court Order made on 28 May 1963 in Case 352 in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia for my own personal and private reasons.

 

2. The Discharge includes I and my two sons unequivocally keeping all citizenships.

 

3. The State of Victoria agree to pay any costs:

 

a) by the County Court to issue my Discharge

 

b) for a birth certificate, new passport, drivers licence, vehicle registration, title deeds to my property in the name of Donna Bugat

 

c) for me to live a safe and sustainable life in my own home in France and in agreed accommodation in Melbourne, Australia

 

The State of Victoria is therefore legally obliged by the terms of my discharge to immediately negotiate the safe outcome with me within one week (because let’s be honest they only care about money) -or- accept my own financial terms, which they do know would in any event be reasonable.

 

I am and have always been open to reasonable discussion and genuine negotiation, but I do not accept under any circumstances just going along with whatever suits others because the true potential of the beauty and gift of life is so much bigger than… any politics or government.

 

The outcome of any negotiation that is necessary would be provided to the County Court as a simple annex to my discharge.

 

There is therefore no court hearing necessary for the discharge of the County Court Order.

 

 

 

Signed by Donna Bugat

 

in the State of Victoria this

10th day of September 2020

 

Address: xx xxx xx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxx 22450, Brittany, France. 

 

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

 

 

Supplementary Notes:

 

I am aware there is no legitimate aim convincingly established in any law for an adult to be legally bound beyond adulthood or for life either by a County Court ‘Adoption’ Order made against them as a child, or subsequent additional legislation, such as the ‘because I can Act 1984’ which was made without my knowledge or consent, and indeed in any event… after I was eighteen years old. 

 

I have considered the Affidavit form sent to me by the County Court yesterday, (albeit, I don't actually carry a printer around with me !!) and what I can say, is that I am just like anyone else, so I can make any order in my case, just like anyone else, in any case, that is not even legally confined to the ‘because I can Act 1984’ written on the Affidavit sent to me by the County Court.

 

There is no legal need for even a signed and dated witness statement, which is usually sufficient, because it is actually simply a Discharge Order I am creating, in an existing case, where I am not legally obliged to provide any personal or private reasons.

 

I am not personally aware of any legitimate aim convincingly established in law, to legally prevent my own… choice of… notifying the County Court of a legal certainty, which is my own Discharge Order relating to the County Court Order, that cannot be refused, rather than my… applying, which would at best be… misleading, because there is clearly no legitimate aim convincingly established in law to compel me to… apply, which is immediately unnecessarily adversarial anyway.

 

It would obviously be an incredibly perverse abuse of process for me to pay the costs of what can only be my ‘successful’ !! … discharge of the County Court Order made… against me, in a case that already exists, so there could not possibly be any costs payable by me to the Court.

 

The reason I am notifying of my apolitical discharge of the County Court Order in Case 352 “Without Prejudice’ is because it is made in the absence of legal representation being given to me, despite my being eligible and having paid taxes etc.

 

This means the terms of my discharge should be agreed and cannot be overtaken until such time as it is contested in the County Court, which could only legally be done with my having legal representation, a civil jury, and in accordance with the rule of law.

 

I am an adult (and have been for quite some considerable time now) so it is beyond all reasonable doubt, I am legally entitled to make my own informed decisions. It has always been impossible to live with a County Court Order that leaves me legally unrepresented, without any oversight of any kind.

 

There are no costs payable by me, to the County Court or anyone else to give legal effect to my discharge, and my discharge of the County Court Order, cannot be declined, because I refuse to pay, because my Discharge of the County Court Order, by contrast reasonably asserts, the State of Victoria will cover all the costs of my discharge, including birth certificate, passport etc.

 

The discharge also unequivocally states the citizenships of myself and my two sons will remain unchanged.

 

My being able to continue living in my own home in France which I love is a central issue to be resolved, and it inevitably follows my ability to do that, directly affects my ability to safely live a sustainable life in Australia too, which I would like to do.

 

I can either live in my own home in France or the County Court Order prevents me from doing so, which is why I am willing to put up my home in France as collateral in Case 352, because I do not willingly consent to going along with everything the County Court Order or the much later ‘because I can Act 1984’ imposes.

 

I cannot continue to be affected by the disruption the County Court Order imposes on my life… anywhere.

 

My discharge of the County Court Order necessarily means the State of the Victoria must facilitate my safely living a sustainable life in my own home in France too.

 

(The legal reality is it is a legal impossibility for the British PM Johnson to deny he exiled myself and Neil Kerslake my Welsh boyfriend from the UK and that it is known no politician or government could overtake my/our lawsuits, with any political decision resulting from that, which is ultimately the fault of the… County Court Order made against me as a child)

 

Therefore a safe and sustainable life in my own home in France, with any necessary support is the priority.

 

The State of Victoria is therefore legally obliged by the terms of my discharge to immediately negotiate that outcome with me within one week (because let’s be honest they only care about money) -or- accept my own terms, which they do know would in any event be reasonable.

 

I am and have always been open to reasonable discussion and genuine negotiation, but I do not accept under any circumstances just going along with whatever suits others because the true potential of the beauty and gift of life is so much bigger than… any politics or government.

 

The outcome of any negotiation would be provided to the County Court as a simple annex to my discharge.

 

It is possible that in the future, I could use my own ‘lived experience’ in a positive way, to help provide some truly independent ‘oversight’ of global adoption and legislation, which I could also do from my own home in France, because the more civilised society becomes, the less cases there will be, which are all unique, involving sensitive and particularly complex legal and moral issues.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

 

 

____________