The British PM & 'journalist' Johnson (who should resign) would frankly find it a legal impossibility to deny he exiled Donna Bugat & Neil Kerslake, to further his own 'political' career (03.09.2020)

 

 

 

 

 

The British PM only became the PM... after he forced me to leave my home in France, because he was avoiding a civil jury. 

 

It is not legally possible for politicians to 'overtake' civil jury lawsuits against them, by any means.

 

Johnson knows the very obvious reason he illegally denied me legal representation, was because a jury would know he was always refusing to hand over the CCTV that was secured and exists of the use of life threatening torture in the attempted murder of me, on his watch as Mayor of London and boss of the top cops.

 

He would frankly find it a legal impossibility to deny he exiled me and Neil Kerslake to further his own 'political' career, and indeed he would never even deny it, because that is the only way he climbed the greasy pole to become PM.

 

It would obviously have been a legal impossibility for him to have continued as Mayor of London, let alone become PM if the lawsuits against him had been settled, because he would at the very least have had to resign, which of course he still should do anyway. 

 

I do not have to be re-traumatised by reliving the very real trauma that is not denied by the nightmare called Johnson, who caused it. 

 

What is seriously illegal is that he abused his position as a politician to illegally access private information about my childhood to exploit the fact the County Court Order made against me as a child during the forced 'adoptions' was only possible because we were denied... legal representation.

 

The crocodile tears from politicians over 'forced adoptions' while I was btw in Parliament Square, Central London, are just that, because there remains a refusal by the political classes to properly inform people, including in advance, of their absolute legal right, to as adults, discharge those court orders made against them as children, for any personal or private reason of our... choosing, whether in the UK (which the political classes in the UK deny !!) or Australia (where there is still the untenable charade of a 'permission' argument). 

 

I am hardly the first woman to find Johnson creepy, but I am the first woman to publicly accuse him of the life threatening torture and attempted murder of me, because I am entitled to try and protect myself so I can feel and be safe, along with trying to protect other women too. 

 

I am, after all, the one who actually has to live with the terror of what he did to me. 

 

There's a very big difference between a politician/journalist grandstanding for cheap soundbites, and fronting up before a civil jury.  

 

_________

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: I am notifying the Australian State Premiers & PM of my global humanitarian ‘Mission Possible’ to peacefully cross national and international borders safely to assert Jus Cogens (11.09.2020)

 

 

 

 

I am legally notifying the Australian State Premiers & PM of my global humanitarian ‘Mission Possible’ to peacefully cross national and international borders safely to assert Jus Cogens.

 

I don’t personally mind going on a global humanitarian 'Mission Possible' with two weeks in every country, although I will miss a family wedding and might not be home for Christmas, I can deliver my document, take some pictures, and collect some stamps.

 

It’s not good enough for anyone to just talk about the peace and harmony of the rule of law, because we all have to live Jus Cogens, for everyone’s children.

 

I trust the Australian State Premiers & PM will support me.

 

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

 

 

In the County Court at Melbourne                         Case 352

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE APOLITICAL DISCHARGE

 

OF HER  ‘ADOPTION’

 

by

 

Donna Bugat

 

ACCORDING TO THE GLOBAL PEACE & HARMONY OF THE RULE OF LAW

 

& JUS COGENS

 

Date of Document: 10 September 2020

Filed by: Donna Bugat

Prepared by: Donna Bugat

 

1. I hereby notify the County Court that I am as an adult discharging the County Court Order made on 28 May 1963 in Case 352 in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia ‘without prejudice’ for my own personal and private reasons.

 

2. The apolitical Discharge includes I and my two sons unequivocally keep all citizenships.

 

3. The State of Victoria and Commonwealth of Australia agree to pay any costs:

 

a) incurred by the County Court to issue my Discharge

 

b) to me for a birth certificate, new passport, drivers licence, vehicle registration, title deeds to my property in the name of Donna Bugat, etc

 

c) for me to live a safe and sustainable life in my own home in France and in agreed accommodation in Melbourne, Australia

 

4. I trust the Australian State Premiers & PM support my global humanitarian 'Mission Possible'.

 

There is therefore no court hearing necessary for the discharge of the County Court Order.

 

 

Signed by Donna Bugat

 

in the State of Victoria this

10th day of September 2020

 

Address: xx xxx xx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxx 22450, Brittany, France. 

 

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

 

 

Please advise within 24 hours, by email is fine, of any legal objections to Jus Cogens.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

_______________________

 

Donna Bugat (& Jus Cogens) -v- State of Victoria Case 352: “I am not the Serious Organized Criminal - no permits” (12.09.2020)

 

 

 

 

The legal reality is the politicians and judiciary had no… discretion (in the s132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation I repealed in the UK) to target me, and were very clearly breaching Article 10 & 11, Freedom of Expression and Peaceful Assembly, with the… unprecedented ruling in the European Union, claiming one of two people peacefully campaigning… together was a “Serious Organized Criminal”.

 

 

... the unprecedented abuse of process in the UK, in the European Union...

 

Tucker v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] EWHC 3019 (Admin) (30 November 2007)

 

The truth is the District Judge at Bow Street Magistrates in 2006 really said I "should not as a single working mother be spending my own money coming to London to peacefully campaign" which he did not want to admit saying either. I was also the only person who had a court order made for the destruction of my banner, despite there being no discretion in the legislation for the politicians and judiciary to do that either, so the truth is the police officer who did steal it, told me he put it on his wall.

 

 

... the pink sequinned banner... "I am not the Serious Organized Criminal - no permits"...

 

... what is the 'offence' created by not having... 'permission'...

 

... the marsupial courts money laundrette... the 'because I can Act 1984' is all about the State of Victoria trying to avoid... costs too...

 

 

Of course, the ’news’ media reports are not often an accurate and contemporaneous record of the truth either.

 

The BBC version of Lord Neuberger denies legal representation in Court of Appeal in 2011

The Telegraph version of Lord Neuberger denies legal representation in Court of Appeal in 2011

The Guardian version of Lord Neuberger denies legal representation in Court of Appeal in 2011

 

The truth is no-one could 'overtake' and change... my High Court Order from April 2008.

 

I walked out of the Court of Appeal in 2011 and just went and bought the largest pair of bolt-cutters I could find, with Neil Kerslake who is my boyfriend, and I then literally cut through a lifetime of lies, using reasonable self de…fence, which did… feel incredibly liberating. I was unlawfully arrested and they did steal my bolt-cutters, but they could not prosecute or imprison me for breaching their phoney ‘injunction’ because they would have had to give me… legal representation, in the errr… Court of Appeal etc.

 

 

I was maliciously targeted in the UK, because of the County Court Order in Melbourne, and the ‘because I can Act 1984’ in the State of Victoria.

 

So, I do already know politicians and the judiciary in Australia have “no recognized defence in law” to put before a civil jury either regarding my peaceful discharge of the County Court Order in Melbourne according to Jus Cogens. A civil jury would more likely than not find the similarity between the cases in Australia and the UK quite extraordinary. It is already beyond all reasonable doubt, that "I am not the Serious Organized Criminal and I do not need anyone's 'permission' to openly say that.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

____________________

 

Donna Bugat (& Jus Cogens) -v- State of Victoria Case 352: My deposition notifying of my overseas travel for private family gatherings in October 2020 (12.09.2020)

 

 

... the super mario brothers...

 

 

 

 

My deposition serves as notifying I am planning to attend a family birthday and wedding overseas, in person, on 19th & 20th October 2020 before going to Ter Apel and Den Haag in the Netherlands.

 

So the Australian State Premiers and PM will need to peacefully facilitate the private family gatherings with a stamped court copy of my Discharge of the County Court Order, according to Jus Cogens.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

________________

 

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: I have a medical exemption to discharge my adoption in County Court, Melbourne, on 14 September 2020 & live in civil ‘PACS’ partnership including overseas that is all recognised by Australian State Premiers & PM (13.09.2020)

 

 

 

 

 

 

I refer to Breton Woods & Jus Cogens.

 

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

 

IN THE COUNTY COURT AT MELBOURNE                                                                    CASE 352

 

IN MATTER OF THE DISCHARGE OF AN ADOPTION

 

by Donna Bugat

 

Date of Document: 14 September 2020

Filed by: Donna Bugat

Prepared by: Donna Bugat

 

1. I hereby notify the County Court in Melbourne I have according to Jus Cogens, a medical exemption to safely:

 

a) discharge my adoption made when I was a minor, at no personal or financial cost to myself or my family members, which will be registered by the Court and with the Australian Central Authority on 14 September 2020.

 

b) travel and live overseas at any time, so I and my family members can choose to keep any citizenships

 

c) live in a civil ‘PACS’ partnership (refer France)

 

recognised by the Australian State Premiers and PM.

 

2. The Australian State Premiers and PM agree to pay my reasonable and ongoing financial costs ‘in lieu of legal representation’ relating to the documented unprecedented global abuse of process, so that I can live a safe and sustainable life with my own family.

 

The compensation will be paid to me through the County Court in Melbourne who can only have my bank details to pay compensation to me.

 

3. The Australian State Premiers & PM will ensure I and my family members can receive any medical treatment of my/our choosing wherever I am/we are and they will pay for my/our safe travel overseas or to return to Australia at the request of myself or any family member for any personal or private reason, at any time.

 

4. I or any family member (and in exceptional cases a 'McKenzie friend') could re-open my Case 352 at no cost to myself or them, if or in the unlikely event, there are any unintended or unforeseen circumstances arising from my discharge of my adoption on 14 September 2020, where in any event legal liability would still rest with Australian State Premiers & the PM.

 

5. I have a medical exemption to safely travel to Springvale at any time, including on 18th September 2020, before I travel overseas for private family gatherings including a family birthday and wedding on 19th & 20th October 2020, so that I can quietly honour the memory of my beautiful little sister who I was raised separately from and whose untimely death was wholly preventable.

 

There are no words to express the loss in a world where we all have our own sisters and brothers and sons and daughters and mothers and fathers and friends, we all love in our global human family.

 

6. The Australian Central Authority will file a copy of my discharge of my adoption in the County Court Melbourne on 14th September 2020 in Den Haag in the Netherlands that in my case, will be available to the public, free of charge, although I am not legally obliged to discuss the details of my case, unless I choose to, on my own terms.

 

Therefore, there is no need for any court hearing, in the County Court, Melbourne, because it is in all our interests to peacefully agree my reasonable out of court settlement.

 

Signed by Donna Bugat

 

 

 

in the State of Victoria this

13th day of September 2020 

 

Address: xx xxx xx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxxxxx, 22450, Brittany, France.

 

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

 

 

 

_________________

 

 

 

__________________

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: Premier Andrews is legally obliged to resign over political scandal surrounding illegal … reversal of civil procedure, because the truth is my adult discharge of my forced ‘adoption’ has legal effect now (14.09.2020)

 

 

... meowgli... it was obvious to absolutely everyone, I and my brother could not possibly have been closely related...

 

 

 

Dear DOJ,

 

Thank you for your email this evening on behalf of the Premier and County Court who do not practise any identifiable separation of powers.

 

I am sure the DOJ must have… always been aware of politicians illegal… reversal of civil procedure with their ‘because I can Act 1984’ and that therefore my discharge of my forced ‘adoption’ has now taken legal effect, which the County Court and yourselves are actually legally obliged to recognize.

 

I could of course produce twelve honest people who agree with me, if you like !!

 

_________________________________________________________________________________

 

IN THE COUNTY COURT AT MELBOURNE                                                                    CASE 352

 

IN MATTER OF THE DISCHARGE OF AN ADOPTION

 

by Donna Bugat

 

Date of Document: 14 September 2020

Filed by: Donna Bugat

Prepared by: Donna Bugat

 

1. I hereby notify the County Court in Melbourne I have according to Jus Cogens, a medical exemption to safely:

 

a) discharge my adoption made when I was a minor, at no personal or financial cost to myself or my family members, which will be registered by the Court and with the Australian Central Authority on 14 September 2020.

 

b) travel and live overseas at any time, so I and my family members can choose to keep any citizenships

 

c) live in a civil ‘PACS’ partnership (refer France)

 

recognised by the Australian State Premiers and PM.

 

2. The Australian State Premiers and PM agree to pay my reasonable and ongoing financial costs ‘in lieu of legal representation’ relating to the documented unprecedented global abuse of process, so that I can live a safe and sustainable life with my own family.

 

The compensation will be paid to me through the County Court in Melbourne who can only have my bank details to pay compensation to me.

 

3. The Australian State Premiers & PM agree they will ensure I and my family members can receive any medical treatment of my/our choosing wherever I am/we are and they will pay for my/our safe travel overseas or to return to Australia at the request of myself or any family member for any personal or private reason, at any time.

 

4. I or any family member (and in exceptional cases a 'McKenzie friend') could re-open my Case 352 at no cost to myself or them, if or in the unlikely event, there are any unintended or unforeseen circumstances arising from my discharge of my adoption on 14 September 2020, where in any event legal liability would still rest with Australian State Premiers & the PM.

 

5. I have a medical exemption to safely travel to Springvale at any time, including on 18th September 2020, before I travel overseas for private family gatherings including a family birthday and wedding on 19th & 20th October 2020, so that I can quietly honour the memory of my beautiful little sister who I was raised separately from and whose untimely death was wholly preventable.

 

There are no words to express the loss in a world where we all have our own sisters and brothers and sons and daughters and mothers and fathers and friends, we all love in our global human family.

 

6. The Australian Central Authority will file a copy of my discharge of my adoption in the County Court in Melbourne on 14 September 2020 in Den Haag in the Netherlands that in my case, will be available to the public, free of charge, although I am not legally obliged to discuss the details of my case, unless I choose to, on my own terms.

 

Therefore, there is no need for any court hearing, in the County Court, Melbourne, because it is in all our interests to peacefully agree my reasonable out of court settlement. 

 

Signed by Donna Bugat

 

 

 

in the State of Victoria this

13th day of September 2020 

 

Address: xx xxx xx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxxxxx, 22450, Brittany, France.

 

_________________________________________________________________________________

... my discharge of my adoption has taken legal effect now...

 

It’s very sad that public officials continue to try and discriminate against people subjected to forced ‘adoptions’ which means there is an ongoing failure to recognize us as… human beings with… feelings, which is of course totally unacceptable.

 

In the global adult world I live in, reasonable and rational, responsible adults know I have as an adult legally discharged my forced ‘adoption’.

 

The Chief Health Officer of Victoria and the Chief of Police in Victoria are obviously legally obliged to recognize my discharge of my forced ‘adoption’ too, not least because there is no known ‘offence’ I could be arrested, prosecuted and convicted over for having peacefully discharged my forced ‘adoption’ I quite reasonably and legally refuse to recognize.

 

The incontrovertible unprecedented evidence is I was maliciously targeted in -both- Australia and the UK, which caused harmful life threatening and devastating consequences, precisely because I could peacefully notify, on a handwritten scrap of paper if that is how I chose to do it (we did btw 'win' two linked ‘landmark’ cases in the UK, by doing just that)

 

My previous identity only now exists in the closed minds of politicians and others who refuse to practise the peace and harmony of the rule of law which is what I do peacefully represent.

 

Premier Andrews is therefore clearly legally obliged to resign now so I can have a court stamped copy of my discharge of my adoption which includes being compensated, so I can live a safe and sustainable life, free of such wholly arbitrary discrimination.

 

Either I am legally and morally correct that I have a medical exemption from his abuse of process, or Premier Andrews is right that I don't, because we can't both be right.

 

'Adoptions' should never have been sooooooo politicised... anywhere.

 

The DOJ do have a legal obligation to properly inform all adopted people when they are children, of their absolute legal right to simply… notify the court as adults of the discharge of their ‘adoption’ which we do not have to apply to do and pay for and cannot be refused by anyone, in what are already existing cases where we are, if anyone is, claiming costs that are instead payable to us.

 

It is not possible for adults to honestly say to other... adults, we need to apply and have the permission of the state and so on and so forth who we also need to pay with a mean(s) tested charade… simply to discharge our own ‘adoption’ because that not only insults anyone's intelligence, but it continues the... abusive pattern of... control inherent in forced 'adoptions'. 

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

 

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: I am a natural born Australian… citizen, who doesn’t feel I can belong and call Australia home, until my own identity is officially recognized (15.09.2020)

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have only ever naturally wanted my own identity since I was a small child, but I have only ever lived the experience of ‘official’ hostility over my own identity.

 

This is despite the fact, I am a natural born Australian… citizen, who does not have to apply for permission from anyone else for my own identity.

 

The legislative gymnastics that falsely claim I need to pay to apply and have the permission of the likes of the public ‘official’ who posed as my godfather who was Director General of ASIO when the ‘because I can Act 1984’ was invented (when the true circumstances beggar belief) by which time I was already an adult, living overseas, is not only deeply offensive but absolutely unlawful.

 

I would have found it easier as a child if I had… known and been properly informed of my… absolute legal right to discharge my ‘adoption’ as an adult (which would have also discouraged adults, from without my knowledge, denying my own identity and nationalities, and cultural heritage, all of which is of itself very difficult to come to terms with)

 

There is no doubt I would have qualified for a medical exemption from my forced ‘adoption’ as child because it was so obviously detrimental to my own health and wellbeing, in any and every way.

 

I can never feel I belong and can call Australia my home until my own identity is officially recognised, so my own Mediterranean cultural heritage is no longer ‘officially’ airbrushed out.

 

The fact I was a legally unrepresented child who originally travelled overseas to London on a British passport during the Christmas and New Year of 1966/67 (the County Court in Melbourne was always aware from their own records I could be as a legally unrepresented child removed from Australia) helps explain why politicians were trying to destroy records in the UK in 2008, which would also be difficult for the State of Victoria in Australia to explain too, because I did not originally travel overseas as an unaccompanied minor etc etc.

 

The only hearing there could ever be in the County Court in Melbourne would be before a jury, where it is the State of Victoria who would have ‘no recognised defence in law’ to explain the repeated indefensible life threatening attacks by assailants, on me, orchestrated by the Palace of Westminster, in the UK, because the State of Victoria, with the knowledge of the County Court in Melbourne, originally left me legally unrepresented as a child.

 

The State of Victoria, with reckless disregard for my health and wellbeing ‘put in place a sequence of events’ that has always unnecessarily put my own life at risk.

 

The ‘official’ recognition of my identity in Case 352, which is not ‘optional’ along with compensation so I have a safe and sustainable life in Australia and France is the only responsible way forward, because it is the State of Victoria who is legally responsible for me currently having neither.

 

 

... wall street...

 

The truth is I can legally notify the Commissioner of the Victorian Police of a lawful peaceful campaign by myself, with my own identity, and address in France, that he would legally have no choice but to officially recognise and indeed could only ‘dispute’ before a civil jury in the County Court in Melbourne, in Case 352, all at no expense to myself, because there is no reasonable doubt whatsoever that despite my having no legal representation myself, through no fault of my own, I have properly notified the County Court in Melbourne of my discharge of my ‘adoption’ which has legal effect now.

 

The true legal reality is the State of Victoria has no choice but to give everyone who is ‘adopted’ the choice of a medical exemption to discharge their ‘adoption’ at any time.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

______________

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: I am suing State of Victoria for $15.5 million dollars over refusal to recognise my discharge of my 'adoption' (16.09.2020)

 

 

 

I am using my home in France as collateral to have a civil jury, in what is an extremely urgent civil jury case that must be listed at the latest, within three months.

 

I am suing the State of Victoria for $15.5 million dollars over the refusal to recognise my discharge of my adoption, which given it involves longstanding false imprisonment etc, is a very serious state breach of Jus Cogens.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

______________________

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: I am notifying of my interim order for €45,000 to rent a property in Catalonia to live in, while I look around for land to purchase there (16.09.2020) 

 

 

I am notifying of my interim order for €45,000 to rent a property in Catalonia to live in, while I look around for land to purchase there.

 

This will also peacefully facilitate my attending family gatherings etc which is important for my own and my family's health and wellbeing.

 

The cost of my interim order is covered because I am using my property in France as collateral in Case 352, where I am suing the State of Victoria for $15.5 million dollars because of their refusal, to recognise my discharge of my 'adoption'.  

 

I do not reasonably believe, the State of Victoria has a legal professional willing to give a published legal opinion in open court, let alone before a civil jury, along with an agreed accurate and contemporaneous record of legal proceedings, that I have done anything wrong.

 

There is a rose in the castle at the foot of the mountains overlooking the sea 35kms from someone else's border.

 

Jus Cogens.

 

Kind regards,

 

Donna Bugat 

 

___________________________

 

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: My Discharge of Adoption & Re-unification Order is my global peace strategy of a universally recognised DNA Family & Science Bank registered in Golan Heights with ‘home offices’ around the world (19.09.2020)

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am supposed to be universally protected by Jus Cogens.

 

The County Court in Melbourne is legal obliged to recognise my Discharge of Adoption & Re-unification Order dated 19th September 2020 in Case 352.

 

______________________________________________________________

 

 

IN THE COUNTY COURT AT MELBOURNE                                               CASE 352

 

IN MATTER OF THE DISCHARGE OF ADOPTION & RE-UNIFICATION ORDER

 

by Donna Bugat

 

Date of Document: 19 September 2020

Filed by: Donna Bugat

Prepared by: Donna Bugat

 

1. I hereby notify the County Court in Melbourne of my Discharge of Adoption and Re-unification Order dated 19th September 2020 in Case 352.

 

2. I am supposed to be universally protected by Jus Cogens, along with my family members who can choose to keep their citizenships. 

 

3. My Order includes an ‘unlimited budget’ from the government for me to establish a universally recognised DNA Family & Science Bank which will be registered in the Golan Heights, because it is my global peace strategy for myself and everyone else that would also be used to help provide free unlimited voluntary apolitical ‘home testing’ kits for everyone during a pandemic. The organisation would operate ‘home offices’ around the world.

 

Everyone from all walks of life has a common interest in DNA through our families and because of it’s scientific value too. The scientific community cannot always develop vaccines for everyone, but it is possible to develop and distribute free unlimited voluntary apolitical ‘home testing’ kits people can do ourselves for many illnesses or a pandemic.

 

4. I would love to enjoy a family gathering for Hanukkah and Christmas in Jerusalem this year, and maybe later return to Australia.

 

5. A copy of my Discharge and Re-unification Order dated 19th September 2020 in Case 352 should always be available free of charge for the public, and my case can only be referred back to the County Court in Melbourne if there is a dispute over money.

 

 

Signed by Donna Bugat

 

in the State of Victoria this

19th day of September 2020 

 

Address: xx xxx xx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxxxxx, 22450, Brittany, France.

 

_______________________________________________________

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

______________

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: There are clear compelling legal & medical reasons for my Order, so I can also help my boyfriend who was transferred from hospital to Ter Apel refugee centre & now to another hospital, while seriously ill, during a global pandemic !! (20.09.2020)

 

 

... donna loves neil...

 

 

I was falsely labelled a “Serious Organized Criminal” in London in the UK as a single working mum, by now repealed legislation, because when I was a small child, the County Court in Melbourne, Australia astonishingly treated me in Case 352, as having less rights than an adult criminal.

 

There was no global pandemic when I was a child in Melbourne, Australia, or an adult peacenik in the UK.

 

I don’t personally know of any legal reasons to stop my peacefully campaigning alone during a pandemic, while taking all available reasonable precautions to try and protect myself and others.

 

My personal view is it is common-sense, all vulnerable people with pre-existing illnesses should be able to voluntarily do unlimited ‘home testing’ ourselves, during a pandemic, that would also help protect health professionals too, because of course we need and want to take reasonable precautions, that where possible is not completely reliant on any external bureaucracy.

 

No-one knows if there will ever be a vaccine that would be safe for everyone, anyway. It is self evident, all family members and health workers visiting or working with vulnerable people in care homes and hospitals also need to have a simple ‘home test’ to do too that gives an accurate result in a short time frame, because that obviously helps everyone.

 

It is deeply distressing that my boyfriend who is “not a serious organized criminal” either is so vulnerable while so seriously ill, being transferred from and between hospitals and Ter Apel refugee centre during a global pandemic !!

 

He was transferred from hospital in the Netherlands, to Ter Apel refugee centre and has now been re-admitted to hospital elsewhere in the Netherlands, with a life threatening emergency, while seriously ill.

 

Any reasonable and rational human being would know it is impossible for someone who is so seriously ill to be under so much external bureaucratic pressure, under any circumstances.

 

This is something I and others have previously complained about in the British courts on the court record (which was reported in the British press, albeit not in an accurate and contemporaneous record of those far from legal proceedings) when the latest British PM Johnson (with the help of the latest Leader of the Opposition who was DPP at that time) maliciously prosecuted myself and my best friend when he was in… hospital in Bremen in Germany, when there was no global pandemic.

 

There is the unresolved Case 352.

 

I am a ’natural born’ Australian citizen and my boyfriend clearly would have become an Australian citizen by now too, along with his two children who live in the UK, if it had not been for my Case 352 being through no fault of my own, unresolved.

 

I am not the only peacenik, from… a small group of peaceniks in the UK, with pre-existing health issues.

 

Therefore, the only safe and sustainable legal options at this time including my boyfriend who cannot travel, are a cross border mix between Gronau in Germany and Enschede in the Netherlands, where I can, with my Court Order in Case 352 rent a quiet apartment in Gronau, Germany from people we know, that my boyfriend can stay in with me and have whatever medical assistance he needs, at any time, including the heilpracticker he knows, who is nearby, while still using hospitals just across the border in the Netherlands if and as necessary.

 

Gronau and Enschede are like one town/city on two sides of a border really.

 

I would be my boyfriend’s ‘carer’ while he was getting treatment that would also give him the quiet time and space to consider if he might like to at some time, take up Australian citizenship, while both the Netherlands and Germany, have social security/healthcare agreements with Australia.

 

This would help legally resolve our inextricably linked case/s for politicians, and most importantly ourselves, because we would also have the time to peacefully be together focusing on improving our health and wellbeing, which is our own priority.

 

We do need to be ‘Forever’ together in a safe and sustainable way.

 

I know my boyfriend’s heilpraktiker who is the same one my best friend had, will help both of us to navigate the medical systems, because but for the fact my long term PTSD was so bad, so I didn’t really want to have anything to do with ordinary or alternative medical professionals at all myself when I previously spent some time in that area, I know he would have helped me too.

 

I would need to be able to have my Discharge of Adoption and Re-Unification Order done, because it would still be impossible for me to meaningfully engage with health professionals myself, in the Netherlands or Germany, without my own identity, because that has caused so many of my own health issues throughout my life.

 

I would need the best available ‘home testing’ kits to do myself, because there is no way I would be putting myself or my boyfriend (or indeed anyone else) at risk.

 

There could not be clearer or more compelling legal and medical reasons for my immediate Discharge of my Adoption and Re-unification Order, because all that is really being argued over are the financial medical costs… of people who most certainly didn’t ‘choose’ to be ill !!

 

Kind regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

Related:

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: Neil and I would be together, caring for one another, if political & news media classes, along with global corporations really supported fair competition, within Jus Cogens (20.09.2020)

 

 

... donna loves neil...

 

 

 

 

I was treated worse than a criminal as a small child in Australia, and a single working mum in the UK, by the state apparatus et al.

 

Neil and I didn’t ‘choose’ to get ill, but I and we have been ripped off by an ‘astonishing’ number of public servants, the political and media classes along with global corporations who don’t like fair competition, within Jus Cogens.

 

---------

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: My Discharge of an Adoption & Re-unification Order for the Republic of Australia with a new Constitution of equality of opportunity for everyone (22.09.2020)

 

 

... my name is donna...

 

 

 

 

I’ll leave it to the… monarchy to explain my travelling to the UK on a British passport when I was four years old.

 

I have immunity from prosecution, because it is beyond all reasonable doubt I peacefully oppose cronyism and support fair competition.

 

Therefore if I am in Australia, which I do happen to be, it could only legally be a republic, with a new Constitution, according to Jus Cogens, where people really do… choose their own identity.

 

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

 

IN THE COUNTY COURT AT MELBOURNE          CASE 352

 

IN MATTER OF THE DISCHARGE OF ADOPTION & RE-UNIFICATION ORDER

 

that establishes the REPUBLIC OF AUSTRALIA

 

by Donna Bugat

 

Date of Document: 22nd September 2020

Filed by: Donna Bugat

Prepared by: Donna Bugat

 

1. I hereby notify the County Court in Melbourne of my Discharge of Adoption and Re-unification Order for a Republic of Australia with a new Constitution with equality of opportunity for everyone dated 22nd September 2020 in Case 352.

 

2. I am supposed to be universally protected by Jus Cogens, along with my family members who can choose to keep their citizenships. 

 

3. The far from Commonwealth is legally obliged to peacefully resettle anyone living in Australia who wants to continue living under a monarchy.

 

4. Children who are adopted are legally entitled to independent legal representation so they are properly informed of their legal rights, which include an absolute right to discharge their adoption as an adult without anyone else’s ‘permission’ and with all the costs paid by the new republic of Australia (the former far from Commonwealth are legally obliged to pay the costs of discharges etc from existing adoptions)

 

5. Any Crown Estate claims from the former Commonwealth of Australia revert to the Republic of Australia, which it is guaranteed the pretender Johnson won’t get far trying to argue against in a court of the Republic of Australia.

 

6. The Republic of Australia is actually peacefully and legally possible 

 

7. I think I could actually... feel at home in a Republic of Australia that had a new Constitution with equality of opportunity for everyone, because that would also be somewhere all my own family could then actually... feel welcome too. 

 

8. A copy of my Discharge and Re-unification Order to establish the Republic of Australia in Case 352 should always be available free of charge for the public, and my case can only be referred back to the County Court in Melbourne if there is a dispute over the Republic of Australia.

 

Signed by Donna Bugat

 

 

 

 

 

in the State of Victoria this

22nd day of September 2020 

 

Address: xx xxx xx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxxxxx, 22450, Brittany, France.

 

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

 

It is strange but true the State of Victoria et al could not buy a legal opinion that says otherwise in an agreed accurate and contemporaneous record witnessed by twelve honest people, so we could have some free and fair elections too.

 

 

... the black madonna...

 

 

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

Related:

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: The scientific evidence is a passport that illegally stops a… … law abiding… Australian citizen… legally leaving the country, is combustible (24.09.2020)

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: The scientific evidence is a passport that illegally stops a… … law abiding…  Australian citizen…  legally leaving the country, is combustible (24.09.2020)

 

 

... my name is donna...

 

 

The scientific evidence is a passport that illegally stops a… law abiding.. Australian citizen… legally leaving the country is combustible.

 

The Australian government have refused without lawful excuse to provide legal reasons to stop my legally leaving the country to visit my own family for birthdays, weddings and while they are in hospital, which is what the barbaric and cruel, child trafficking monarchy have done using Case 352… my entire life.

 

...the scientific evidence is a passport that illegally stops a… … law abiding…  Australian citizen…  legally leaving the country, is combustible...

 

It… beggars belief that anyone would move my once British and now stateless boyfriend who is seriously ill, from a hospital in the Netherlands, to the Ter Apel refugee centre, knowing they were not equipped to cater for his medical needs, before having to transfer him from there to another hospital in Emmen in the Netherlands because of a life threatening medical emergency caused by him being in a refugee centre who could not properly look after him in the first place, during a global pandemic !!

 

I do not personally accept that is how human beings can treat other human beings, and I hold the Australian government responsible. 

 

It would be self evident to any sentient human being my boyfriend is too ill to jump through bureaucratic obstacles. 

 

Shame on the Australian 'government'.

 

 

... the self serving british monarchy who have never done a single day of voluntary unpaid public serviced their entire lives...

 

 

It is absolutely unlawful for the Australian government who owe… me large sums of money in Case 352, to stop me being with my family, at this time, and indeed while other people can visit my boyfriend in hospital.

 

 

... its utterly useless for a law abiding australian citizen who doesn't need the 'permission' of the rip off monarchy and their 'westminster system' for anything...

 

Meanwhile, the political and news media classes, along with their lawless monarchy typically do as they please.

 

The British monarchy who:

 

... the anything but neutral or excellent cronyism...

 

 

a) have numerous undisclosed conflicts of interest in their malicious prosecution of me as a fifteen month old… child in Case 352, in Melbourne

 

... the unsurpassed greed of the... illegitimate monarchy making another land grab  (left in perpetuity for the public) long... after i was in parliament square, central london, all of which australian politicians and dfat et al did know...

 

 

b) had also failed to mention in their malicious prosecution of me as an… adult in the High Court on 21st June 2010 in the UK, their undeclared conflict of interest from 19th February 2008 they had failed to disclose (that I did when I blew the whistle) and which was of course some considerable time… after I was lawfully in Parliament Square, Central London. 

 

The only reason we had to be in Parliament Square, Central London doing what we could to try and save innocent and defenceless civilian lives, was because the political and news media classes fawn all over the dishonourable monarchy who clearly only still exist because of the political and news media classes.

 

The monarchy sure didn't oppose the Iraq War, that people from all walks of life were united in opposing. 

  

 

... i am an australian citizen, and the monarchy are not my monarchy and i have no legal connection to them, but... they are the monarchy illegally stopping law abiding australian citizens legally leaving australia...

 

I am an Australian citizen... in my own right, and... my Australian citizenship exists separately from and is regardless of and not dependent in any legal way on the British monarchy who are not my monarchy, and did not give me my birthright of my Australian citizenship, and do not speak on my behalf or instead of me, and indeed do not in any way represent me. 

 

I am a law abiding Australian citizen who does not need the… permission of a dishonourable old self serving child trafficking British crone on the throne, who is anything but neutral (and in never having cared for other human life, let alone humanity… ever, is indistinguishable from the coronavirus) to have my own identity and travel when I legally choose to, on a … genuine Australian passport for… Australian citizens. 

 

 

... the useless 'passport' looks better like this... i am an australian citizen in my own right and i have no legal connection whatsoever to the monarchy who are not my monarchy...

 

It is the British monarchy who have their clawprints all over Brexit which they spun and signed off on, that just keeps on giving during a global pandemic, because of course the monarchy, Brexit and the global pandemic are indistinguishable, because of course rich people cross any border they like, just like a global pandemic.  

 

The… Australian government is legally obliged to provide me at no cost to myself with the necessary travel documents, for me as a law abiding… Australian citizen, without delay.

 

 

... london issue... it's just another racket from the royal scroungers who have never done a single day of voluntary unpaid public service their entire lives...

 

There is no legally justifiable reason in having Australia public officials who… choose to solely be the servants of the British monarchy, who lawlessly do whatever they want to Australian citizens, instead of Australian public officials serving their fellow… Australian citizens who are law abiding.

 

The vocabulary of the illegitimate British monarchy who don't care about peaceful law abiding British or Australian citizens, and have pretty much invaded the whole world to get rich by slaughtering indigenous people, can be summarised as telling people who don't like what they do, they "should go back to where they came from, or somewhere else, if they don't like it".  

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

Republic of Australia For Life.

 

_________________

 

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: My Order to discharge adoption, that naturally triggers referendum on new Constitution for Republic of Australia to recognise & safeguard absolute right to citizenship, is also unique opportunity to peacefully help transform global politics (27.09.2020)

 

 

 

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

 

 

IN THE COUNTY COURT AT MELBOURNE                      CASE 352

 

IN MATTER OF

 

ORDER to DISCHARGE ADOPTION & HOLD REFERENDUM ON NEW CONSTITUTION FOR REPUBLIC OF AUSTRALIA TO RECOGNISE & SAFEGUARD ABSOLUTE RIGHT OF CITIZENSHIP 

 

 

... my name is donna...

 

 

 

 

by Donna Bugat

 

Date of Document: 27th September 2020

Filed by: Donna Bugat

Prepared by: Donna Bugat

 

1. I hereby notify the County Court in Melbourne of my Order dated 27th September 2020, to Discharge my Adoption that naturally triggers a referendum on a new Constitution for a Republic of Australia to recognize and safeguard my absolute right to Australian citizenship in Case 352.

 

I am first and foremost in my own right, an Australian citizen, which cannot legally be changed by any State or Federal governments in Australia, or any other government or monarchy.

 

My own identity was changed at 15 months old, from a natural born Australian citizen with an Australian mother and Italian father, to a British mother and Australian father, by the highest echelons of the entourage of British and Australian intelligence services who posed as my parents and godparents.

 

I and my two sons will keep all our citizenships and my own home in an autonomous region in the Republic of France with my discharge of my adoption, that also naturally triggers a referendum on a new Constitution for a Republic of Australia.

 

2. It is agreed I have the necessary legal immunity to oversee a referendum on a new Constitution for a Republic of Australia, that should be held in 2022 prior to the next general election.

 

Australia needs a new Constitution for a Republic of Australia to guarantee equality of opportunity for all Australian citizens. 

 

All Australian citizens have the opportunity through a referendum to agree a new Constitution for a Republic of Australia (which has the unique opportunity to improve on existing models of republics in countries like Italy, France and the United States that does not need the approval of the British Commonwealth, European Union or United Nations) that can help to peacefully transform global politics, while favourably positioning the country as an emerging leader for the foreseeable future, in the global transition to a greater use of clean renewable energy too.

 

3. The State and Federal governments in Australia will provide me with any travel documents that are necessary for me to travel in my own name of Donna Bugat, prior to the referendum, so that I do not need to rely on the legal limbo created by an Australian passport issued by the British monarchy which undermines the legal reality I have Australian citizenship in my own right, that is not dependant on any State or Federal Australian governments or any other government or monarchy.

 

4. The DHHS are through my recent hotel quarantine in Melbourne, Australia legally obliged to pay me $3 million dollars to settle my lawsuits against the ‘Westminster system’ in Australia and the UK, so that I can maintain my independence from any political or other influence over the referendum etc, while peacefully living in Australia.

 

5. A copy of my Order dated 27th September 2020 in Case 352 should always be available free of charge for the public, and in the unlikely event there are any legal challenges arising from the referendum, they would be referred back to my case for legal determination.

 

 

 

Signed by Donna Bugat

 

in the State of Victoria this

27th day of September 2020 

 

Address: xx xxx xx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxxxxx, 22450, Brittany, France.

 

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥