The British PM & 'journalist' Johnson (who should resign) would frankly find it a legal impossibility to deny he exiled Donna Bugat & Neil Kerslake, to further his own 'political' career (03.09.2020)

 

 

 

 

 

The British PM only became the PM... after he forced me to leave my home in France, because he was avoiding a civil jury. 

 

It is not legally possible for politicians to 'overtake' civil jury lawsuits against them, by any means.

 

Johnson knows the very obvious reason he illegally denied me legal representation, was because a jury would know he was always refusing to hand over the CCTV that was secured and exists of the use of life threatening torture in the attempted murder of me, on his watch as Mayor of London and boss of the top cops.

 

He would frankly find it a legal impossibility to deny he exiled me and Neil Kerslake to further his own 'political' career, and indeed he would never even deny it, because that is the only way he climbed the greasy pole to become PM.

 

It would obviously have been a legal impossibility for him to have continued as Mayor of London, let alone become PM if the lawsuits against him had been settled, because he would at the very least have had to resign, which of course he still should do anyway. 

 

I do not have to be re-traumatised by reliving the very real trauma that is not denied by the nightmare called Johnson, who caused it. 

 

What is seriously illegal is that he abused his position as a politician to illegally access private information about my childhood to exploit the fact the County Court Order made against me as a child during the forced 'adoptions' was only possible because we were denied... legal representation.

 

The crocodile tears from politicians over 'forced adoptions' while I was btw in Parliament Square, Central London, are just that, because there remains a refusal by the political classes to properly inform people, including in advance, of their absolute legal right, to as adults, discharge those court orders made against them as children, for any personal or private reason of our... choosing, whether in the UK (which the political classes in the UK deny !!) or Australia (where there is still the untenable charade of a 'permission' argument). 

 

I am hardly the first woman to find Johnson creepy, but I am the first woman to publicly accuse him of the life threatening torture and attempted murder of me, because I am entitled to try and protect myself so I can feel and be safe, along with trying to protect other women too. 

 

I am, after all, the one who actually has to live with the terror of what he did to me. 

 

There's a very big difference between a politician/journalist grandstanding for cheap soundbites, and fronting up before a civil jury.  

 

_________

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: I am notifying the Australian State Premiers & PM of my global humanitarian ‘Mission Possible’ to peacefully cross national and international borders safely to assert Jus Cogens (11.09.2020)

 

 

 

 

I am legally notifying the Australian State Premiers & PM of my global humanitarian ‘Mission Possible’ to peacefully cross national and international borders safely to assert Jus Cogens.

 

I don’t personally mind going on a global humanitarian 'Mission Possible' with two weeks in every country, although I will miss a family wedding and might not be home for Christmas, I can deliver my document, take some pictures, and collect some stamps.

 

It’s not good enough for anyone to just talk about the peace and harmony of the rule of law, because we all have to live Jus Cogens, for everyone’s children.

 

I trust the Australian State Premiers & PM will support me.

 

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

 

 

In the County Court at Melbourne                         Case 352

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE APOLITICAL DISCHARGE

 

OF HER  ‘ADOPTION’

 

by

 

Donna Bugat

 

ACCORDING TO THE GLOBAL PEACE & HARMONY OF THE RULE OF LAW

 

& JUS COGENS

 

Date of Document: 10 September 2020

Filed by: Donna Bugat

Prepared by: Donna Bugat

 

1. I hereby notify the County Court that I am as an adult discharging the County Court Order made on 28 May 1963 in Case 352 in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia ‘without prejudice’ for my own personal and private reasons.

 

2. The apolitical Discharge includes I and my two sons unequivocally keep all citizenships.

 

3. The State of Victoria and Commonwealth of Australia agree to pay any costs:

 

a) incurred by the County Court to issue my Discharge

 

b) to me for a birth certificate, new passport, drivers licence, vehicle registration, title deeds to my property in the name of Donna Bugat, etc

 

c) for me to live a safe and sustainable life in my own home in France and in agreed accommodation in Melbourne, Australia

 

4. I trust the Australian State Premiers & PM support my global humanitarian 'Mission Possible'.

 

There is therefore no court hearing necessary for the discharge of the County Court Order.

 

 

Signed by Donna Bugat

 

in the State of Victoria this

10th day of September 2020

 

Address: xx xxx xx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxx 22450, Brittany, France. 

 

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

 

 

Please advise within 24 hours, by email is fine, of any legal objections to Jus Cogens.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

_______________________

 

Donna Bugat (& Jus Cogens) -v- State of Victoria Case 352: “I am not the Serious Organized Criminal - no permits” (12.09.2020)

 

 

 

 

The legal reality is the politicians and judiciary had no… discretion (in the s132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation I repealed in the UK) to target me, and were very clearly breaching Article 10 & 11, Freedom of Expression and Peaceful Assembly, with the… unprecedented ruling in the European Union, claiming one of two people peacefully campaigning… together was a “Serious Organized Criminal”.

 

 

... the unprecedented abuse of process in the UK, in the European Union...

 

Tucker v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] EWHC 3019 (Admin) (30 November 2007)

 

The truth is the District Judge at Bow Street Magistrates in 2006 really said I "should not as a single working mother be spending my own money coming to London to peacefully campaign" which he did not want to admit saying either. I was also the only person who had a court order made for the destruction of my banner, despite there being no discretion in the legislation for the politicians and judiciary to do that either, so the truth is the police officer who did steal it, told me he put it on his wall.

 

 

... the pink sequinned banner... "I am not the Serious Organized Criminal - no permits"...

 

... what is the 'offence' created by not having... 'permission'...

 

... the marsupial courts money laundrette... the 'because I can Act 1984' is all about the State of Victoria trying to avoid... costs too...

 

 

Of course, the ’news’ media reports are not often an accurate and contemporaneous record of the truth either.

 

The BBC version of Lord Neuberger denies legal representation in Court of Appeal in 2011

The Telegraph version of Lord Neuberger denies legal representation in Court of Appeal in 2011

The Guardian version of Lord Neuberger denies legal representation in Court of Appeal in 2011

 

The truth is no-one could 'overtake' and change... my High Court Order from April 2008.

 

I walked out of the Court of Appeal in 2011 and just went and bought the largest pair of bolt-cutters I could find, with Neil Kerslake who is my boyfriend, and I then literally cut through a lifetime of lies, using reasonable self de…fence, which did… feel incredibly liberating. I was unlawfully arrested and they did steal my bolt-cutters, but they could not prosecute or imprison me for breaching their phoney ‘injunction’ because they would have had to give me… legal representation, in the errr… Court of Appeal etc.

 

 

I was maliciously targeted in the UK, because of the County Court Order in Melbourne, and the ‘because I can Act 1984’ in the State of Victoria.

 

So, I do already know politicians and the judiciary in Australia have “no recognized defence in law” to put before a civil jury either regarding my peaceful discharge of the County Court Order in Melbourne according to Jus Cogens. A civil jury would more likely than not find the similarity between the cases in Australia and the UK quite extraordinary. It is already beyond all reasonable doubt, that "I am not the Serious Organized Criminal and I do not need anyone's 'permission' to openly say that.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

____________________

 

Donna Bugat (& Jus Cogens) -v- State of Victoria Case 352: My deposition notifying of my overseas travel for private family gatherings in October 2020 (12.09.2020)

 

 

... the super mario brothers...

 

 

 

 

My deposition serves as notifying I am planning to attend a family birthday and wedding overseas, in person, on 19th & 20th October 2020 before going to Ter Apel and Den Haag in the Netherlands.

 

So the Australian State Premiers and PM will need to peacefully facilitate the private family gatherings with a stamped court copy of my Discharge of the County Court Order, according to Jus Cogens.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

________________

 

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: I have a medical exemption to discharge my adoption in County Court, Melbourne, on 14 September 2020 & live in civil ‘PACS’ partnership including overseas that is all recognised by Australian State Premiers & PM (13.09.2020)

 

 

 

 

 

 

I refer to Breton Woods & Jus Cogens.

 

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

 

IN THE COUNTY COURT AT MELBOURNE                                                                    CASE 352

 

IN MATTER OF THE DISCHARGE OF AN ADOPTION

 

by Donna Bugat

 

Date of Document: 14 September 2020

Filed by: Donna Bugat

Prepared by: Donna Bugat

 

1. I hereby notify the County Court in Melbourne I have according to Jus Cogens, a medical exemption to safely:

 

a) discharge my adoption made when I was a minor, at no personal or financial cost to myself or my family members, which will be registered by the Court and with the Australian Central Authority on 14 September 2020.

 

b) travel and live overseas at any time, so I and my family members can choose to keep any citizenships

 

c) live in a civil ‘PACS’ partnership (refer France)

 

recognised by the Australian State Premiers and PM.

 

2. The Australian State Premiers and PM agree to pay my reasonable and ongoing financial costs ‘in lieu of legal representation’ relating to the documented unprecedented global abuse of process, so that I can live a safe and sustainable life with my own family.

 

The compensation will be paid to me through the County Court in Melbourne who can only have my bank details to pay compensation to me.

 

3. The Australian State Premiers & PM will ensure I and my family members can receive any medical treatment of my/our choosing wherever I am/we are and they will pay for my/our safe travel overseas or to return to Australia at the request of myself or any family member for any personal or private reason, at any time.

 

4. I or any family member (and in exceptional cases a 'McKenzie friend') could re-open my Case 352 at no cost to myself or them, if or in the unlikely event, there are any unintended or unforeseen circumstances arising from my discharge of my adoption on 14 September 2020, where in any event legal liability would still rest with Australian State Premiers & the PM.

 

5. I have a medical exemption to safely travel to Springvale at any time, including on 18th September 2020, before I travel overseas for private family gatherings including a family birthday and wedding on 19th & 20th October 2020, so that I can quietly honour the memory of my beautiful little sister who I was raised separately from and whose untimely death was wholly preventable.

 

There are no words to express the loss in a world where we all have our own sisters and brothers and sons and daughters and mothers and fathers and friends, we all love in our global human family.

 

6. The Australian Central Authority will file a copy of my discharge of my adoption in the County Court Melbourne on 14th September 2020 in Den Haag in the Netherlands that in my case, will be available to the public, free of charge, although I am not legally obliged to discuss the details of my case, unless I choose to, on my own terms.

 

Therefore, there is no need for any court hearing, in the County Court, Melbourne, because it is in all our interests to peacefully agree my reasonable out of court settlement.

 

Signed by Donna Bugat

 

 

 

in the State of Victoria this

13th day of September 2020 

 

Address: xx xxx xx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxxxxx, 22450, Brittany, France.

 

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

 

 

 

_________________

 

 

 

__________________

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: Premier Andrews is legally obliged to resign over political scandal surrounding illegal … reversal of civil procedure, because the truth is my adult discharge of my forced ‘adoption’ has legal effect now (14.09.2020)

 

 

... meowgli... it was obvious to absolutely everyone, I and my brother could not possibly have been closely related...

 

 

 

Dear DOJ,

 

Thank you for your email this evening on behalf of the Premier and County Court who do not practise any identifiable separation of powers.

 

I am sure the DOJ must have… always been aware of politicians illegal… reversal of civil procedure with their ‘because I can Act 1984’ and that therefore my discharge of my forced ‘adoption’ has now taken legal effect, which the County Court and yourselves are actually legally obliged to recognize.

 

I could of course produce twelve honest people who agree with me, if you like !!

 

_________________________________________________________________________________

 

IN THE COUNTY COURT AT MELBOURNE                                                                    CASE 352

 

IN MATTER OF THE DISCHARGE OF AN ADOPTION

 

by Donna Bugat

 

Date of Document: 14 September 2020

Filed by: Donna Bugat

Prepared by: Donna Bugat

 

1. I hereby notify the County Court in Melbourne I have according to Jus Cogens, a medical exemption to safely:

 

a) discharge my adoption made when I was a minor, at no personal or financial cost to myself or my family members, which will be registered by the Court and with the Australian Central Authority on 14 September 2020.

 

b) travel and live overseas at any time, so I and my family members can choose to keep any citizenships

 

c) live in a civil ‘PACS’ partnership (refer France)

 

recognised by the Australian State Premiers and PM.

 

2. The Australian State Premiers and PM agree to pay my reasonable and ongoing financial costs ‘in lieu of legal representation’ relating to the documented unprecedented global abuse of process, so that I can live a safe and sustainable life with my own family.

 

The compensation will be paid to me through the County Court in Melbourne who can only have my bank details to pay compensation to me.

 

3. The Australian State Premiers & PM agree they will ensure I and my family members can receive any medical treatment of my/our choosing wherever I am/we are and they will pay for my/our safe travel overseas or to return to Australia at the request of myself or any family member for any personal or private reason, at any time.

 

4. I or any family member (and in exceptional cases a 'McKenzie friend') could re-open my Case 352 at no cost to myself or them, if or in the unlikely event, there are any unintended or unforeseen circumstances arising from my discharge of my adoption on 14 September 2020, where in any event legal liability would still rest with Australian State Premiers & the PM.

 

5. I have a medical exemption to safely travel to Springvale at any time, including on 18th September 2020, before I travel overseas for private family gatherings including a family birthday and wedding on 19th & 20th October 2020, so that I can quietly honour the memory of my beautiful little sister who I was raised separately from and whose untimely death was wholly preventable.

 

There are no words to express the loss in a world where we all have our own sisters and brothers and sons and daughters and mothers and fathers and friends, we all love in our global human family.

 

6. The Australian Central Authority will file a copy of my discharge of my adoption in the County Court in Melbourne on 14 September 2020 in Den Haag in the Netherlands that in my case, will be available to the public, free of charge, although I am not legally obliged to discuss the details of my case, unless I choose to, on my own terms.

 

Therefore, there is no need for any court hearing, in the County Court, Melbourne, because it is in all our interests to peacefully agree my reasonable out of court settlement. 

 

Signed by Donna Bugat

 

 

 

in the State of Victoria this

13th day of September 2020 

 

Address: xx xxx xx xxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxxxxx, 22450, Brittany, France.

 

_________________________________________________________________________________

... my discharge of my adoption has taken legal effect now...

 

It’s very sad that public officials continue to try and discriminate against people subjected to forced ‘adoptions’ which means there is an ongoing failure to recognize us as… human beings with… feelings, which is of course totally unacceptable.

 

In the global adult world I live in, reasonable and rational, responsible adults know I have as an adult legally discharged my forced ‘adoption’.

 

The Chief Health Officer of Victoria and the Chief of Police in Victoria are obviously legally obliged to recognize my discharge of my forced ‘adoption’ too, not least because there is no known ‘offence’ I could be arrested, prosecuted and convicted over for having peacefully discharged my forced ‘adoption’ I quite reasonably and legally refuse to recognize.

 

The incontrovertible unprecedented evidence is I was maliciously targeted in -both- Australia and the UK, which caused harmful life threatening and devastating consequences, precisely because I could peacefully notify, on a handwritten scrap of paper if that is how I chose to do it (we did btw 'win' two linked ‘landmark’ cases in the UK, by doing just that)

 

My previous identity only now exists in the closed minds of politicians and others who refuse to practise the peace and harmony of the rule of law which is what I do peacefully represent.

 

Premier Andrews is therefore clearly legally obliged to resign now so I can have a court stamped copy of my discharge of my adoption which includes being compensated, so I can live a safe and sustainable life, free of such wholly arbitrary discrimination.

 

Either I am legally and morally correct that I have a medical exemption from his abuse of process, or Premier Andrews is right that I don't, because we can't both be right.

 

'Adoptions' should never have been sooooooo politicised... anywhere.

 

The DOJ do have a legal obligation to properly inform all adopted people when they are children, of their absolute legal right to simply… notify the court as adults of the discharge of their ‘adoption’ which we do not have to apply to do and pay for and cannot be refused by anyone, in what are already existing cases where we are, if anyone is, claiming costs that are instead payable to us.

 

It is not possible for adults to honestly say to other... adults, we need to apply and have the permission of the state and so on and so forth who we also need to pay with a mean(s) tested charade… simply to discharge our own ‘adoption’ because that not only insults anyone's intelligence, but it continues the... abusive pattern of... control inherent in forced 'adoptions'. 

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

 

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: I am a natural born Australian… citizen, who doesn’t feel I can belong and call Australia home, until my own identity is officially recognized (15.09.2020)

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have only ever naturally wanted my own identity since I was a small child, but I have only ever lived the experience of ‘official’ hostility over my own identity.

 

This is despite the fact, I am a natural born Australian… citizen, who does not have to apply for permission from anyone else for my own identity.

 

The legislative gymnastics that falsely claim I need to pay to apply and have the permission of the likes of the public ‘official’ who posed as my godfather who was Director General of ASIO when the ‘because I can Act 1984’ was invented (when the true circumstances beggar belief) by which time I was already an adult, living overseas, is not only deeply offensive but absolutely unlawful.

 

I would have found it easier as a child if I had… known and been properly informed of my… absolute legal right to discharge my ‘adoption’ as an adult (which would have also discouraged adults, from without my knowledge, denying my own identity and nationalities, and cultural heritage, all of which is of itself very difficult to come to terms with)

 

There is no doubt I would have qualified for a medical exemption from my forced ‘adoption’ as child because it was so obviously detrimental to my own health and wellbeing, in any and every way.

 

I can never feel I belong and can call Australia my home until my own identity is officially recognised, so my own Mediterranean cultural heritage is no longer ‘officially’ airbrushed out.

 

The fact I was a legally unrepresented child who originally travelled overseas to London on a British passport during the Christmas and New Year of 1966/67 (the County Court in Melbourne was always aware from their own records I could be as a legally unrepresented child removed from Australia) helps explain why politicians were trying to destroy records in the UK in 2008, which would also be difficult for the State of Victoria in Australia to explain too, because I did not originally travel overseas as an unaccompanied minor etc etc.

 

The only hearing there could ever be in the County Court in Melbourne would be before a jury, where it is the State of Victoria who would have ‘no recognised defence in law’ to explain the repeated indefensible life threatening attacks by assailants, on me, orchestrated by the Palace of Westminster, in the UK, because the State of Victoria, with the knowledge of the County Court in Melbourne, originally left me legally unrepresented as a child.

 

The State of Victoria, with reckless disregard for my health and wellbeing ‘put in place a sequence of events’ that has always unnecessarily put my own life at risk.

 

The ‘official’ recognition of my identity in Case 352, which is not ‘optional’ along with compensation so I have a safe and sustainable life in Australia and France is the only responsible way forward, because it is the State of Victoria who is legally responsible for me currently having neither.

 

 

... wall street...

 

The truth is I can legally notify the Commissioner of the Victorian Police of a lawful peaceful campaign by myself, with my own identity, and address in France, that he would legally have no choice but to officially recognise and indeed could only ‘dispute’ before a civil jury in the County Court in Melbourne, in Case 352, all at no expense to myself, because there is no reasonable doubt whatsoever that despite my having no legal representation myself, through no fault of my own, I have properly notified the County Court in Melbourne of my discharge of my ‘adoption’ which has legal effect now.

 

The true legal reality is the State of Victoria has no choice but to give everyone who is ‘adopted’ the choice of a medical exemption to discharge their ‘adoption’ at any time.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

______________

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: I am suing State of Victoria for $15.5 million dollars over refusal to recognise my discharge of my 'adoption' (16.09.2020)

 

 

 

I am using my home in France as collateral to have a civil jury, in what is an extremely urgent civil jury case that must be listed at the latest, within three months.

 

I am suing the State of Victoria for $15.5 million dollars over the refusal to recognise my discharge of my adoption, which given it involves longstanding false imprisonment etc, is a very serious state breach of Jus Cogens.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Donna Bugat

 

______________________

 

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria Case 352: I am notifying of my interim order for €45,000 to rent a property in Catalonia to live in, while I look around for land to purchase there (16.09.2020) 

 

 

I am notifying of my interim order for €45,000 to rent a property in Catalonia to live in, while I look around for land to purchase there.

 

This will also peacefully facilitate my attending family gatherings etc which is important for my own and my family's health and wellbeing.

 

The cost of my interim order is covered because I am using my property in France as collateral in Case 352, where I am suing the State of Victoria for $15.5 million dollars because of their refusal, to recognise my discharge of my 'adoption'.  

 

I do not reasonably believe, the State of Victoria has a legal professional willing to give a published legal opinion in open court, let alone before a civil jury, along with an agreed accurate and contemporaneous record of legal proceedings, that I have done anything wrong.

 

There is a rose in the castle at the foot of the mountains overlooking the sea 35kms from someone else's border.

 

Jus Cogens.

 

Kind regards,

 

Donna Bugat