Print

Greenpeace & Extinction Rebellion spin-off should RESPECT PUBLIC FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT, instead of continually trying to undermine genuine & effective protest by trying to ’normalise’ arrest as a ‘tactic’ (09.10.2019) 

 

 

Greenpeace has long been controversial among protesters, because it really only uses the word protest to hide it is really only another 'lobbyist'.

 

 

... brian & myself were the model of energy efficiency in parliamen square and we never sought to get arrested... the most extraordinary cover-up of the unlawful arrest of brian and myself by the establishment, who (forgot to publicly mention they) used a fake protester from the government run democracy village protest to unlawfully arrest me...

 

 

I don’t think Greenpeace can call themselves protesters when they raise money to pay people to get ‘arrested’ for ‘publicity’ before being paid to plead ‘guilty’ in courts, because Greenpeace pays the lawyers and fines.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/09/extinction-rebellion-risks-polarising-public-on-climate-veteran-activist-says

 

"Major environment groups, including the Australian Conservation Foundation and Greenpeace (who are not active or successful protesters) back XR protests" (who use same 'tactics')

 

All Greenpeace have really been doing by paying people to get ‘arrested’ for years, is undermining genuine and effective protest in so many ways, while also covering up what really happens to legitimate protesters in the UK.

 

I would never ever trust Greenpeace, who don't even have any interest in human life. 

 

The ‘environmental’ spin-off Extinction Rebellion are with the connivance of Greenpeace also trying to ’normalise’ and indeed trivialise what is always the very, very serious matter of arrests, by also spinning ‘arrest’ as a ‘tactic’ that is a ’tool’ in the same outdated ‘tradition’ of ‘civil disobedience’ which is nothing more than a government run canard that as Brian said, “chews people up in their sausage machine before spitting them out”.

 

The swamp in politics include politicians et al illegally running protests to entrap people. 

 

Greenpeace & Extinction Rebellion are really only trying to gloss over the unlawful arrests of legitimate genuine protesters, because there isn’t a reason peaceful protesters (who don’t need to block clean renewable energy like trams for goodness sakes) should be getting arrested.   

 

Responsible protesters simply would not be encouraging people to get arrested because we know how serious it really is.

 

One of the obvious issues Greenpeace & Extinction Rebellion appear to be avoiding with their arrest ‘tactic’ is the question of why they don’t show real environmental leadership and start their own clean renewable energy companies which the public are free to do.

 

If they really are so popular they will have no problem raising the necessary funds to start so many clean renewable energy companies, including alongside their fellow travellers like Hollywood and royal luvvies. (I remember the British Establishment's fake 'Democracy Village' protest, which was illegally used to maliciously prosecute Brian and myself, used to be arranged so that there were particular paid protesters who would turn up to do whatever media show the government wanted. The court records show the execrable 'Speaker' of the House of Commons, Bercow was in cahoots with Johnson et al, publicly !! writing a pompous letter to Johnson when he was the Mayor of London, demanding we be illegally 'removed')

 

In particular it really is not legitimate for Extinction Rebellion to restrict the freedom of movement of the public, which is exactly what British politicians are trying to retrospectively legalize with their referendum for goodness sakes.

 

Related:

 

Donna ‘Black-Cat’ Bugat: British monarchy are stopping true free market capitalism with their global centuries old illegitimate landholdings which are not a level playing field (02.12.2019)

 

I am curious to see what true free market capitalism looks like with a real level playing field.

 

It is common-sense it is a fundamental human right everyone should have the land security of owning some land so they can build their own shelter which is necessary for their survival. 

 

Love, Peace, Justice For All xx

 

The truth is free.