Print

 

 

Donna ‘Black-Cat’ Bugat: Yes, eugenics was cruelly racist, completely changing a child’s identity in what was state sponsored child trafficking (07.10.2019)

 

The British monarchy and far from Commonwealth intelligence services and politicians et al did completely change children’s identities.

 

They engaged in eugenics, studying and 'experimenting' with children's genetics. 

 

... I have lived the real life of a converso in our times because of the secrets and lies of so many politicians et al... 

 

And yes it could be and often was cruelly deeply racist, and included religious discrimination. 

 

The state completely changed our identities, because there were no legal grounds to stop children returning to their families so we were endlessly lied to.

 

It was state sponsored child trafficking, because it was done for financial reasons, to benefit very wealthy people. 

 

The highest echelons of the British & Australian intelligence services were involved.

 

They… intended to cause permanent harm to the most vulnerable, innocent and defenceless children. 

 

The UK & Australia politicians et al peddle the 'nationalist' narrative because it encourages racists of any colour to unite against people on the grounds of 'nationality' (and sometimes religion). 

 

The state sponsored child trafficking:

 

... someone wrote to me (while I was in Parliament Square, Central London) and said I must find it difficult to try & come to terms with everything that has happened, which is something of an understatement...

 

The adults who posed as my parents and godparents came from the highest echelons of the British & Australian intelligence services. 

 

I am a 'mixed' race Catalan Italian (British Australian) born during the Franco era when he was Europe's favourite military dictator who got away with it all. 

 

The colonial Treaty of Utrecht.

 

The governments:

 

... most people call it (state sponsored) kidnapping... which was widespread in latin america too... 

 

It was a very insincere 'apology' by politicians who staged their own 'inquiry' into state sponsored abuse. 

 

The 'state care' of the highest echelons of the intelligence services who failed to declare their serious conflict of interest (The Treaty of Utrecht):

 

Schrodinger's Cat...it is obvious it would be distressing for a child to be held prisoner by the highest echelons of the intelligence services....

 

I was punished because I refused to join the Australian or British intelligence services or military... specifically because they had (lied to me &) completely changed my identity when I was a child. 

 

 

... and yet the state are very precious about you how describe them and what they do...

 

I didn't have an argument per se with the intelligence services, because they were the intelligence services.

 

... it was very wrong to hide a child behind the highest echelons of the intelligence services...

 

I just always naturally wanted my own true identity, which is what most children & adults would want and is very important to me.

 

I was never any part of the world of the intelligence services who make their own informed choice as... adults, which they were seeking to circumvent and worse by grabbing children whose identities they changed. It would have been incredibly illegal to exploit and recruit someone in my situation, and yet that is what they did try and (fail to) do. The fact I was 'raised' by people who were central to the (for example) Cambridge spy ring 'imbroglio' makes it all the worse.

 

It was only when I recently returned to Australia to switch my 'residency' (after the UK used life threatening torture on me in the UK and I was exiled in France) that I discovered they had 'forgotten' to tell me about the legislation I could use to legally formally reclaim my true identity, through the courts, so their lies never ended. The cynical legislation to formally reclaim your true identity through the courts is of course flawed because it reverses the norms of civil procedure in pre-action protocols including discovery, so it is another example of deliberate discrimination, because of course governments did not want the highest echelons of the intelligence services et al on the witness stand in front of a High Court civil jury.  (I learned a lot about the governments propensity  for 'legal gymnastics' while I was in Parliament Square, Central London and we forced the repeal of their free speech ban)

  

My interest is legally having my true identity, because that will help undo some of the harm, so I can actually experience some freedom others take for granted, I have never enjoyed. 

 

Related:

 

Donna ‘Black-Cat’ Bugat: British monarchy are stopping true free market capitalism with their global centuries old illegitimate landholdings which are not a level playing field (02.12.2019)

 

I am curious to see what true free market capitalism looks like with a real level playing field.

 

It is common-sense it is a fundamental human right everyone should have the land security of owning some land so they can build their own shelter which is necessary for their survival. 

 

Love, Peace, Justice For All xx

 

The truth is free.