Donna Black-Cat Bugat: I am ‘distinguished’ from S141-150 PRSR Act 2011; I used Golan ‘self-defence’ law, S3(1) Criminal Law Act 1967 to switch ‘residency’ from pavement (back to) grass on Parliament Square in November 2009 (21.06.2019)
The British politicians, police and their ‘news’ media (PR firms etc) in Westminster never talk with the public, but instead talk at the public without… due process.
...ss 132-138 socpa 2005 had... no due process..
Brian and myself legally ‘blew the whistle’ on 21 June 2010 in the High Court in London, on Corbyn and his quisling Livingstone et al who always -illegally- hid their tent emails from 8 March 2007, from legal scrutiny.
They were always trying to ‘overtake’ our lawsuits that came first like CO/11393/2007
The case files show politicians et al incl. the top cop pointedly refused to have any ‘dialogue’ including with regard to CO/11393/2007 (because the top cop knew he was illegally hiding the 8 March 2007 emails)
The government had originally passed ‘anti-competition’ legislation (ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005) to ‘remove’ peaceniks, because Corbyn et al weren’t really peaceniks (so they gave themselves and fellow cronies an ‘exemption’ because they didn’t campaign)
It was Brian, not Corbyn et al, who really opposed sanctions that only harmed Iraqi civilians.
There was no published due process to ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 (now repealed)
I used reasonable self-defense (the Golan law) S1(3) Criminal Law Act 1967 when I switched ‘residency’ (back) to the grass from the pavement on November 18 2009, after:
a) the government had used the life-threatening attack by the ‘unknown’ assailant on 17 August 2007, (after the quisling Livingstone had used private contractors to illegally try and ‘remove’ us that same day)
b) the life threatening torture etc on 4 September 2009
c) trashed absolutely all my property on 18 November 2009, the government put on the pavement.
Brian followed me when I switched back to the grass in Parliament Square, which was divvied up between ‘different’ government departments, because I said, however you looked at it, the grass was safer.
The government had ‘removed’ us from the grass in 2007 when they knew they could no longer prosecute us, which remained true when we switched back (there were no costs awarded against us with the malicious prosecutions brought by the government.
When the government first passed s 141- 150 PRSR Act 2011 legislation that was identical to the Corbyn & Livingstone quisling emails they always illegally hid (they were legally obliged to disclose them in legal proceedings in 2007) they illegally legislation against me on 16 January 2012, which immediately became a High Court civil jury lawsuit (while the government spun a fake Judicial Review to withdraw their overt undercover operation) The government subsequently failed in a malicious prosecution against me in the Magistrates Court on 2 April 2012 for being on the pavement, I didn’t even ‘choose’ to be on.
The government violently attacked me on the grass in Parliament Square, Central London, without ever taking me to court, because:
a) they knew they could not legally stop me being on the grass really using the self-defence of S(3) 1 of the Criminal Law Act 1967 (the Golan Law)
b) I would ‘win’ my civil High Court jury lawsuit over 16 January 2012, confirming I had used reasonable ‘self-defense’.
It is very sad when you read what was Brian’s obvious distress at what Corbyn et al were really responsible for doing while always hiding their 8 March 2007 emails.