Donna Black-cat: Ambassadors, I am ‘Autonomous’ Catalan Italian (British Australian) exiled from UK, living in Breizh, France because I ‘proved’ Article 155 Spanish Constitution is ‘void ab initio’ too, so ‘compromise’ is… (20.04.2019)
I am Donna Bugat, a Catalan Italian British Australian ‘mixed’ race and religion pipsqueak peacenik ‘converso’ who at 57 years young and five foot five and a half inches tall and seven stone (45kgs) is an authentic civilian voice for peace, who can do international law.
... my personal view is autonomy (which is the natural human state) within a functioning legal system which would therefore recognise everyone is equal, is the real ‘avant-garde’...
The British and Australian ‘Fremantle’ intelligence services who posed as my parents and god-parents completely changed my identity when I was a child born during the Franco era, because of the Treaty of Utrecht etc.
Catalans have never been offered an ‘independent’ state, like well, pretty much everyone else !!
(It was very difficult as a child having my entire identity stolen by adults around me, who did it for their own and others financial interests, with all the accompanying prejudices etc etc)
The Bugats are the eponymous (Samuel P.) 'Huntington Line' because we have lived for centuries in the mountains and valleys of 'border' regions around the Mediterranean and Eastern Europe through to the Central Asian steppes.
In the UK, when I lawfully campaigned in Parliament Square, for peace, for seven plus years, Brian and myself were subjected to numerous ‘landmark’ political cases, in the longest political trial of two civilians in English history. During that time, I lost my job and was blacklisted & ripped off over my car, and my home which I had to sell, despite having all sorts of insurance cover and having paid taxes, before I was eventually exiled from the UK on 13 April 2013.
I was exiled from the UK because it was… politicians et al who did not have any insurance cover !! to use ss 132-138 (because it was ‘anti-competition’) legislation (now repealed) they illegally used, so it was obviously ‘inconvenient’ for them to have (for example) civil jury lawsuits against them.
There is no identifiable difference really between ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 (now repealed) and Article 155 of the Spanish Constitution.
Therefore, I am a Catalan Italian British Australian born during the Franco era, exiled from the UK and now living in autonomous Breizh in France, who inevitably ‘proves’ the Spanish Constitution Article 155 ‘anti-competition’ is ‘void ab initio’ too.
(In France in 2006, the French government rather cynically 'introduced' the 'Slovenian' bear to the Ariege, in what people suspect was an attempt to try and move Bugats from pastoral land)
If the Spanish government don’t ‘recognize’ exiles from within the European Union, including a Catalan exiled from the UK, there could not possibly be any genuine ’right of return’ to Catalonia incl. for a Catalan exiled from another member state in the European Union.
A reasonable person would know, there is a very real problem with a civilian exile from within the European Union having no legal representation or access to medical treatment etc.
A sensible ‘compromise’ could be:
- Catalans can (choose to) have Catalan passports (like Australians) if they wish because of course passports are a relatively recent invention too, that don’t really change the issue of identity is and should be a very personal choice (the evolution to clean renewable energy and therefore a more stable global economy will inevitably give people greater choices to define their own identity based on all sorts of variables)
The fact my identity was completely changed when I was a child has caused me sooooooo
many problems, over so many years, no politician anywhere has ever helped me with.
- while monarchists keep royal facade (Brian and I have already been 'litigated' against in the UK, and 'won' the relevant 'landmark' cases)
- and everyone votes for a publicly elected EU President (one term of five years)
- along with a publicly agreed justiciable EU Constitution with a pan-EU health and welfare package for everyone.
It really is wholly irrelevant what 'side' any politicians claim to be on, if politicians do not collectively as a starting point have an agreed health and welfare package for civilians across the European Union, so there really are no more civilian exiles from within the European Union.
The legal system in the European Union is only as strong as it's weakest state which means in practise, there is no functioning legal system in the European Union until there is a pan-EU health and welfare package for everyone.
My personal view is autonomy (which is the natural human state) within a functioning legal system which would therefore recognise everyone is equal, is the real ‘avant-garde’.
So countries/regions should aspire to be called or become autonomous, rather than whatever independence is supposed to mean on any given day, depending on who might be saying it.
It’s all self explanatory really.
The British (Commonwealth) ‘referendum’ which has been used to spin the so called ’immigration debate’ in the European Union is such an obvious canard.
The Australian continent which is the same geographical size as the European Union and United States, has by comparison a tiny population. It is possible half of the UK population along with half of the population in the rest of the European Union would actually choose to be ‘immigrants’ in Australia !! which would actually economically benefit from an increase in population so it could become a genuinely ‘multi-cultural’ trade centre, the size of the European Union or United States.
The evolution to clean renewable energy is the new ‘gold rush’ in Australia.