HQ12X02745 : WHEN BRIAN & I WENT TO GET SUMMONS AGAINST BLAIRS 23 MARCH 2007, BLAIRS ISSUED ‘SINE DIE’ SUMMONS AGAINST ME 26 MARCH 2007 (THAT LED TO CONTEMPT CASE) TO TRY & COVER UP 26 MARCH 2006 CIVIL JURY LAWSUIT (THAT UNRAVELS 22 FEB 2006 TOO) (26.04.2018)
The government had a real problem over the unlawful arrest of myself and then Brian on Mother’s Day !! 2006 when they had to release us without charge.
... in fact we were released without charge after making a formal complaint against police to inspector lyons (brian had the recording of the police lying on him when we were unlawfully arrested !!) ...
They unlawfully arrested Brian on Mother’s Day 26 March 2006 because of course he was recording them unlawfully arresting me (because police did have my details) so it was all very odd because of course it was impossible for police to explain when we arrived at Charing Cross Police Station what on earth we were doing in police custody.
HQ12X02745: THE TRUE STORY OF A MUM UNLAWFULLY ARRESTED 48 TIMES & EXILED; POLITICIANS TRIED TO HIDE ORIGINAL MOTHER’S DAY ARREST 26 MARCH 2006 (RELEASED WITHOUT CHARGE) WAS A CIVIL JURY LAWSUIT (25.04.2018)
The Mother’s Day case was the original case that led to 48 unlawful arrests !! because of the arrogance of mob mentality that didn’t want to admit what it had done, just took over and did everything it could to try and stop what was really a civil jury lawsuit once we were released without charge.
It was only a month after the show trial of my original malicious prosecution on 22 February 2006 which the government knew wouldn’t stand the test of time.
26 MARCH 2006 - 26 MARCH 2007
The government faced a very serious problem on 26 March 2006 when they had unlawfully arrested us and had to release us without charge.
This was because:
a) the government knew they could not swing another lie like on 22 February 2006, saying Brian and I could not campaign together… in the criminal courts and even less so in a civil jury lawsuit, so they knew the lie of 22 February 2006 would fall apart in a civil jury lawsuit over 26 March 2006.
that was before they had even managed to
b) steal the campaign property on 23 May 2006 (when they pulled the same stunt unlawfully arresting me while being unable to charge me with anything) which should never have happened incl. because they knew 26 March 2006 was a civil jury lawsuit.
The cover up of my unlawful arrest on 26 March 2006 spawned sooooo many unlawful arrests, which all collapsed when I somehow against so many odds, won the decisive legal victory at Southwark Crown Court on 13 December 2007.
It was very serious what happened over 26 March 2006 because of course I lost my job and was blacklisted and had to sell my home that September so what Blair & Co were doing in the UK too, was very, very serious indeed.
23 MARCH 2007
It was all falling apart… for Blair by Friday 23 March 2007 when Brian and myself went to Horseferry Road Magistrates to get the summons against both Blairs.
District Judge Purdy asked to speak with us and he must have got straight on the bat phone to the Blairs because of course there was such a big cover- up going on relating back to 26 March 2006.
(Tony Murphy a partner from Bindman’s the big Labour supporters, had been forced to change law firms when he ran out of excuses at the end of 2006, over why on earth he hadn’t filed the accumulating civil jury lawsuits for Brian and myself)
After Brian and I went to get the summons on 23 March 2007 (Brian got the one against Cmmr Blair the day PM Blair resigned) the Blairs then issued malicious summons against me (that I didn’t get) and Steve Jago (which was the only reason we were in court on 26 March 2007) so Brian and I were then unlawfully arrested on the trumped up Contempt of Court, which was a desperate attempt by both Blairs to keep trying to cover up so much.
It is a legal impossibility for either Blair to deny they issued malicious summons against me on 26 March 2007 a) because Brian and I went to court on 23 March 2007 to get summons against him, b) because they knew they had to try and cover up 26 March 2006.
The malicious summons against me were very hastily placed ‘sine die’ (they wouldn't pass any legal scrutiny at all) while Blair’s Attorney General Lord Goldsmith brought the bogus Contempt of Court case that the government then had to change 23 years of case law and the infinitive ‘a’ to give what was only a public perception they could keep the bogus Contempt of Court case out of the ... High Court too.
4 SEPTEMBER 2006 - 14 SEPTEMBER 2006
BLAIR & CO TRIED TO RE-BRAND 26 MARCH 2006 CIVIL JURY LAWSUIT AGAINST GOVT AS A (MALICIOUS) PROSECUTION AGAINST ME ON 14 SEPTEMBER 2006 (WHICH THEY LOST) WHICH WAS A VERY SERIOUS ABUSE OF PROCESS.
… 4 September 2006… Blair was desperate to silence me because they knew they were going to lose the abuse of process on 14 September 2006…
Blair was forced to resign on 27 June 2007 over what he did to me on 4 September 2006 (to try and cover up the malicious prosecution over 26 March 2006) that they always knew they were going to lose on 14 September 2006 because they were trying to re-brand !! what was a civil jury lawsuit against them as a criminal prosecution against me, which is a very, very serious abuse of process.
The government's biggest problem was when I won on 13 December 2007 because that wasn't included in their script :
The witness intimidation and tampering by the government was quite incredible.
Politicians who resort to... torturing a female peacenik knew they had no defence.
... i was forced into exile because of their lies...