HQ12X02745 (THE ‘POWER SHARING’ ARRANGEMENT & HABEAS CORPUS) TUCKER VS UK & AUSTRALIAN GOVTS: QUESTION FOR ECJ IS WHY CLAIMANT’S CIVIL JURY LAWSUIT CANNOT BE DEALT WITH BY WAY OF VIDEO LINK FOR CASE MANAGEMENT & TRIAL (17.04.2018)
I am a Claimant who has been exiled by politicians because of a lawsuit, so the use of video link for both case management and civil jury trial is both lawful and sensible, because there are real issues over the suspension of habeas corpus that still have not been legally resolved.
... the witness...
The Question for the ECJ is then confined to the procedural management of the lawsuit because absolutely everything that has happened is an abuse of all due process.
It really does set the worst possible 'precedent' when politicians just use the mob mentality of bullying etc a pipsqueak to force their exile because the defenceless civilian is a Claimant in an existing civil jury lawsuit against politicians !!
... the persecution of conversos that led to the holocaust continues...
The British (and Australian) far from 'Commonwealth' continue to lead the European and Arab governments in their racism and discrimination towards Mediterranean conversos that led to the Holocaust.
The Whitlam 'controversy':
... secrets and lies 1975... still the same royal pretenders and murdoch silver spoon brigade 'yachting club' et al spinning their lies against the pipsqueak converso (my brother wasn't at all racist)...
The European 'white Australia policy' after WW2 that called those of us from the Mediterranean wogs and dagoes (including those of us of labelled 'mixed race') hasn't changed since as an infant both governments hid my true identity and cultural heritage, before my being exiled as an adult, by both 'governments'.