DONNA : BRITISH (& AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT) ALWAYS... KNEW THEY WERE ILLEGALLY USING SPIES TO TRY & STOP LAWFUL SETTLEMENT OF 13 DEC 200...7 LAWSUIT; GOVERNMENTS ALWAYS KNEW THEY HAD 'NO RECOGNISED DEFENCE IN LAW' TO PUT BEFORE HIGH COURT ... JURY (10.03.2018)
There is no doubt the British and Australian ‘intelligence services’ have recklessly sought to harm and endanger my life in the UK etc, while I lawfully and responsibly named them in legal proceedings... in courts.
... the spies betrayed the children and the children's children...
There was no due process of any kind going on in the UK because the ‘intelligence services’ were only trying to illegally stop a High Court jury lawsuit because I had won the ‘decisive victory’ in court on 13 December 2007, that could not be unravelled.
Everything that has happened to me since then (for the past 10 plus years) has only and all been about trying to stop the lawful settlement of that unprecedented lawsuit.
It is a matter of fact that when the British government publicly demanded on 19 July 2009 we be ‘removed’ without any caveats they had declared… war on myself, for being a peacenik !! recklessly inviting any and more dogs to collect, which duly multiplied the very serious harm being done, along with the growing nest of spies in Parliament Square, Central London.
THE TORTURE TAPES :
It is a well known matter of fact, the British (and Australian governments) tortured and attempted to murder me in... September 2009, in Belgravia Police Station, which ultimately forced me out of the UK into exile in the EU, because they have always... illegally refused to hand over the tapes... to me.
The governments 'have not worked out a lawful way' of 'covering up' the torture tapes, because any reasonable and rational person knows there isn't a lawful way that exists.
There is no statute of limitations over torture, which doesn't make it lawful to use torture as yet another... 'excuse' to try and stop the lawful timely settlement of lawsuits, but instead means it is even more important that lawsuits that include the use of torture, which the governments have never been able to deny, are lawfully settled, because the evidence (which was secured) will always remain anyway.
In legal terms, the governments have... already proved... they have no legal grounds for illegally refusing to hand over the torture tapes to me.
The British and Australian governments have always known they have no credible defence to their illegally refusing to hand over the torture tapes to me.
It says it all that it is a female... peacenik !! from a persecuted minority who was forced into exile.
In legal terms the British government did know it is absolutely unlawful for the government… to use spies to try and stop a lawsuit being lawfully settled, including because the government always knew they had no recognised defence in law to even put before a High Court jury.
Spies 'swear an oath' to lie and break the law, which is why when they recklessly harm and endanger a defenceless civilian from a persecuted minority like myself, I could lawfully name them in the High Court like I did on 21 June 2010, to try and stop the cycle of abuse.
In any legal sense I won AGAIN !! on 21 June 2010 in the High Court because the Judge illegally stopped me giving evidence, ridiculously threatening me with Contempt of Court for lawfully giving evidence in my own defence, before… the Judge ran from the court !! and they later closed the court to the press and public and illegally denied me legal representation so I could not give evidence.
So the spooks well and truly lost in court but… continued causing serious harm outside the court.
I was in Parliament Square, Central London to try and… stop terror !! for the benefit of everyone.
It is a very straightforward matter of fact, the British government of both Labour and Tory hired Weightman’s Solicitors in the City of London to try and cover up the ‘decisive victory’ on 13 December 2007, which then included Weightman’s working with (for example) Westminster Council in 2011 to try and cover up the lawsuit... against undercovers too.
The lawsuit arising from the ’decisive victory’ in court on 13 December 200...7 doesn’t change or unravel, while it was foreseeable and is a matter of fact the government intended continuing harm by not lawfully settling lawsuits in a timely manner.
... this 2011 email which is 'the tip' of a very large iceberg was lawfully sent to me (for unknown reasons)... after I had brought the lawsuit against undercovers on 17 august 2011 because of all the identifiable harm they were causing (on 7 october 2011, the high court confirmed my lawsuit over undercovers would proceed, even if westminster council withdrew what I proved was their malicious prosecution against me they were forced to withdraw)...
I did conclusively prove that I would always lawfully deal with spies… in courts of law, while the government just continued to illegally use spies… outside courts of law, solely to try and unlawfully stop the lawful settlement of the unprecedented lawsuit originating from 2007.
Spies do not have an 'unfettered right' to avoid... evidence of their wrongdoing in courts of law, before High Court... juries.
Any reasonable and rational person knows it is clearly absolutely unlawful to use spies !! to try and stop the lawful settlement of a lawsuit.
The incontrovertible evidence is spies have only ever been used to try and illegally stop the lawful settlement of my lawsuits.
The unprecedented further... compounded harm... occurs because of a) the illegal uses of spies to try and stop the lawsuits being lawfully settled b) in the... full knowledge the government always knew they had no defence to even put before a jury.
The government knew they were illegally using spies to try and stop the lawful settlement of lawsuits, because the government always knew the government had no recognised defence in law to even put before a High court jury.
A reasonable and rational person knows it is absolutely unlawful for the government to use spies to try and stop the lawful settlement of lawsuits, because the government always knew they had no recognised defence in law to put before a High Court jury.
I do not need to ‘apologise’ for being a woman and peacenik, let alone from a long persecuted 'minority'.
It has obviously always been... my genuine interest to lawfully settle my unprecedented lawsuit to stop the cycle of abuse so that I can build a new life for myself.