BREXIT : EU ‘ARTICLE 50’ NO DUE PROCESS ‘WITCH-HUNT’ 1282 COPIED BY U.S & IRAN; NO RECONCILIATION BETWEEN... GOVERNMENTS AROUND MEDITERRANEAN OVER SHARIA & RULE OF LAW WITH ‘SAFE ZONE’ FOR... ‘OWN’ CIVILIANS (13.01.2018)
My own ‘case’ within the European Union is 'unusual' (that I promise you has only really and truly been a horrific ‘crown of thorns’) for a number of reasons.
It is a reality I have never had any due process with accompanying legal representation… my whole life.
... the witness... it's about how politicians treat defenceless civilian children and women...
I was as right as one could be, to do the hunger strike in Parliament Square, Central London in 2013 (although I disagree with hunger strikes per se) because the deceit involved in 'Article 50' proves what was true... way back then, that no politicians want law abiding civilians to have any rights anyway, so it is exactly the same situation.
There had been seven years of the government doing no due process in Parliament Square, Central London, during which I had been tortured and Brian died etc... before I went on hunger strike. Then they had the nerve to dishonestly claim 'law' takes a long time, knowing full well, the European Union has no due process for civilian exiles from within the European Union.
A second 'referendum' which more likely than not, will be what politicians always planned, will not change the reality there is no due process for... civilian exiles from within the European Union. Article 50 is only a veneer of opportunity for the 'mob mentality' of politicians to go after those who are already... civilian exiles.
I have been ‘pushed’ around and out by governments under the most appalling circumstances because obviously none of them would want to (for example) unravel almost a millennium of lies in all kinds of 'administrative governance' which is not something I was ever personally asking for myself.
I really am just like most people because I just want peace for defenceless civilians in a ‘safe zone’.
The European Union have not done the right thing.
In any practical sense an exile from within the European Union who will only have been exiled from somewhere else within the European Union through very serious breaches of all rights, (incl. that would prevent refoulement) because true exile really is not something anyone would ever do lightly, has no rights recognised at all.
It simply is not publicly recognised by politicians within the European Union that there are people from within the European Union who could be civilian exiles.
In contrast, refugees who enter the European Union have more rights and so on than civilians from with the European Union who are a 'political football' (I have already done the Commonwealth one and indeed as my own case proves, they do 'merge' with the European Union)
This is particularly ‘cynical’ given the stated purpose of the European Union arising from the… Genocide of Two World Wars.
However, the ultimate 'outcome' of no due process... of any kind for defenceless civilian... children or... women (that I have never personally had as either under the Commonwealth -or- European Union ) under the rule of law is the same as Sharia law... regardless of the governments involved.
The most important point is this.
Our own campaigning was powerful but was... not about power.
There were no terror attacks in the UK in my own seven year watch in Parliament Square, Central London.
In the real world, this benefited everyone.
The JCPOA is a good ‘nuclear’ agreement from the comfortable slipper brigade (I don't personally like anything nuclear myself but I understand the point being made)
The agreement does not however mean any governments respect the basic rights of what they call their ‘own’ civilians, which obviously calls into question their other motives in a world no human made.
This has ‘manifested’ itself through Brexit’s ‘Article 50’ which followed my own exile within the European Union, with politicians dishonestly purporting that any politician can do anything they like to civilians without any due process.
No politician could possibly claim they 'reasonably believed' Article 50 (signed on 13 December 2007) was valid because it is so obviously incompatible with the EU Charter of Fundamental Freedoms (12 December 2007)
Most people know there is of course plenty of hypocrisy to go around with the ‘orange’ one’s latest ‘sanctions’ (see below) that while at least not related to JCPOA, most noticeably omit mention of the Edicts of Expulsion 1290 in the UK that have not been repealed.
The court case in the UK surrounding JCPOA is a very important ruling because of what it really ... reveals.
The JCPOA is an important basic recognition that it is illegal to install governments simply for... commercial reasons, but inevitably still does not recognize that being 'powerful' to save defenceless civilian lives... for the benefit of everyone which is clearly what our campaigning was doing is not the same as/about having 'power' for/through commercial/religious reasons.
I've personally come across too many people... including those who still want to (for example) relive the Shah's days saying they are not bothered about using torture and so on if they are in 'government' which as I know only too well, is not 'pleasant'.
It is self-evident to most people, no civilian needs the revolving doors of the 'politics' of torture from... any government.
In practical terms Article 50 sadly does not in any way reconcile the -'politics'- and -'religions'- in the European Union, let alone around the Mediterranean with... civilians.
There is the need for example for a reconciliation between sharia law with the rule of law which none of the governments are really doing towards their ‘own’ civilians while and because they all... trade all over the place with many governments regardless of the diaspora of (for example) ‘conversos’ that has been going on since at least… 1282.
People are just pushed between or split up between changing 'borders' while governments still manage to trade with... each other.
The governments do all point the finger at each other over sharia and the rule of law etc while by and large trading with all manner of other governments as they wish, usually under international norms of sorts, which highlights numerous inconsistencies for... civilians.
There does need to be a very large 'reconciliation' between governments over using the peace and harmony rule of law towards... civilians if there is going to be a 'safe zone' anywhere for civilians.
The only way to really arrive at peace for civilians is through a de-escalation of... state violence/'strong arm' tactics/blackmail etc of any kind towards... defenceless civilians.
It really is the legal... responsibility of governments to really do the right thing, rather than grandstanding for any and all sorts of their own other 'reasons'.
The hypocrisy of a U.S.military with Guantanamo etc including military bases in the... European Union :
JANUARY 12, 2018
Iranian Regime Prioritizes Destabilizing Weapons While Silencing Its Citizens
Washington – Today, the Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated 14 individuals and entities in connection with serious human rights abuses and censorship in Iran, and support to designated Iranian weapons proliferators.
"The United States will not stand by while the Iranian regime continues to engage in human rights abuses and injustice. We are targeting the Iranian regime, including the head of Iran's judiciary, for its appalling mistreatment of its citizens, including those imprisoned solely for exercising their right to freedom of peaceful assembly, and for censoring its own people as they stand up in protest against their government," said Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin. "We are also targeting Iran's ballistic missile program and destabilizing activities, which it continues to prioritize over the economic well-being of the Iranian people."
Today's actions were taken pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13553, which targets serious human rights abuses by the Government of Iran; E.O. 13606, which targets grave human rights abuses by the Governments of Iran and Syria via information technology; E.O. 13628, which targets, among other things, censorship or other activities that prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of freedom of expression or assembly by citizens of Iran, or that limit access to print or broadcast media; and E.O. 13382, which targets proliferators of weapons of mass destruction and their supporters.
Sadegh Amoli Larijani
Today, OFAC designated Sadegh Amoli Larijani pursuant to E.O. 13553 for being an official of the Government of Iran who is responsible for or complicit in, or responsible for ordering, controlling, or otherwise directing, the commission of serious human rights abuses against persons in Iran or Iranian citizens or residents. As head of Iran's Judiciary, Sadegh Amoli Larijani has administrative oversight over the carrying out of sentences in contravention of Iran's international obligations, including the execution of individuals who were juveniles at the time of their crime and the torture or cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment or punishment of prisoners in Iran, including amputations.
Rajaee Shahr Prison and Gholamreza Ziaei
OFAC designated Rajaee Shahr Prison and Iranian national Gholamreza Ziaei in connection with serious human rights abuses in Iran. Rajaee Shahr Prison was designated pursuant to E.O. 13553 for being a person acting on behalf of the Government of Iran who is responsible for or complicit in, or responsible for ordering, controlling, or otherwise directing, the commission of serious human rights abuses against persons in Iran or Iranian citizens or residents. Gholamreza Ziaei was designated pursuant to E.O. 13553 for having acted for or on behalf of Rajaee Shahr Prison.
Rajaee Shahr Prison has denied prisoners adequate medical care and access to legal representation. Many Iranians who recently protested against their government are imprisoned at Rajaee Shahr, a facility where prisoners participating in hunger strikes are denied medical care; where there are reported incidents of sexual abuse and unlawful executions; and where at least one prisoner had his eye gouged out by prison officials. Gholamreza Ziaei has served as the director of Rajaee Shahr Prison since October 2017.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Electronic Warfare and Cyber Defense Organization
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Electronic Warfare and Cyber Defense Organization (IRGC EWCD Organization) was designated pursuant to E.O. 13606 for being owned or controlled by, or acting for or on behalf of, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which was listed in the Annex to E.O. 13606.
The IRGC has been designated under multiple sanctions authorities, including E.O. 13553 in connection with Iran's human rights abuses. Most recently, on October 13, 2017, the IRGC was designated pursuant to the global terrorism authority E.O. 13224 for activities in support of the IRGC-Qods Force. The IRGC EWCD Organization, which organizes and conducts training courses on behalf of the IRGC, has attempted to censor Iranians' access to Western media.
The Supreme Council of Cyberspace and The National Cyberspace Center
OFAC designated Iran's Supreme Council for Cyberspace pursuant to E.O. 13628 for engaging in censorship or other activities with respect to Iran that prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of freedom of expression or assembly by citizens of Iran, or that limit access to print or broadcast media.
The Supreme Council of Cyberspace was created in 2012 by Iran's Supreme Leader to centralize and oversee the Iranian regime's Internet policymaking and regulation. Since its creation, and for the purported purpose of "protecting the country from negative content of cyberspace," the Supreme Council of Cyberspace has continued the Iranian regime's blocking of many social media sites and other Internet censorship efforts. As the country's top Internet policymaking body, the Supreme Council of Cyberspace oversees the Iranian regime's disruption of the free flow of information by restricting access to tens of thousands of websites, particularly those of international news sources, anti-regime outlets, ethnic and religious minorities, human rights groups, and popular social media sites.
OFAC designated Iran's National Cyberspace Center, for being owned or controlled by the Supreme Council of Cyberspace. The National Cyberspace Center has prevented Iranians from accessing Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) and internet proxies, which are used to bypass Iran's Internet controls, and has sought to prevent Iranians from accessing Western media content. In September 2015, the director of the National Cyberspace Center stated that a building in Tehran's Saadat Abad neighborhood, which is an affluent area of Iran's capital, has been purchased to house the National Cyberspace Center and the office of the head of the Supreme Council of Cyberspace.
Green Wave Telecommunication and Morteza Razavi
OFAC designated Malaysia-based Green Wave Telecommunication and Iranian Morteza Razavi for their activity on behalf of a designated Iranian entity. Green Wave Telecommunication was designated pursuant to E.O. 13382 for being owned or controlled by, and for providing support to, Fanamoj. Morteza Razavi was designated pursuant to E.O. 13382 for acting for or on behalf of Green Wave Telecommunication and Fanamoj.
Fanamoj was designated pursuant to E.O. 13382 on October 13, 2017 for providing support to the IRGC and Iran's Naval Defence Missile Industry Group (SAIG).
Green Wave Telecommunication acquires export-controlled technology and devices on behalf of Fanamoj and its subsidiary, Rastafann. Under the leadership and direction of Morteza Razavi, Green Wave Telecommunication acquired controlled U.S.-origin technology and re-shipped it to Iran-based companies. Morteza Razavi serves as Green Wave Telecommunication's Director and as Fanamoj's Commercial Director.
Iran Helicopter Support and Renewal Company and Iran Aircraft Industries
OFAC designated Iran Helicopter Support and Renewal Company (PANHA) and Iran Aircraft Industries (SAHA), two Iranian defense industry firms that provide key maintenance and overhaul services for Iran's military helicopters and aircraft. PANHA and SAHA were designated pursuant to E.O. 13382 for being owned or controlled by Iran's Aviation Industries Organization.
Iran's Aviation Industries Organization, which is responsible for managing Iran's military aviation industry, was designated pursuant to E.O. 13382 on December 12, 2013 as part of a network of proliferators headed by Iran's Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics.
PANHA is a leading Iranian helicopter maintenance and manufacturer, and has built and overhauled helicopters, including models manufactured in the United States, for the Iranian military and the IRGC. SAHA is Iran's largest provider of overhaul and technical modification services for Iran's military and cargo aircraft.
OFAC designated Chinese-national Shi Yuhua pursuant to E.O. 13382 for acting for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, Wuhan Sanjiang Import and Export Co. LTD (Wuhan Sanjiang), and for having provided financial, material, technological, or other support for, or goods or services in support of, Iran's Shiraz Electronics Industries (SEI). Shi Yuhua, an employee at Wuhan Sanjiang, is responsible for selling navigation-related equipment to SEI.
Wuhan Sanjiang was designated pursuant to E.O. 13382 on October 13, 2017 for having provided financial, material, technological, or other support for, or goods or services in support of, SEI.
SEI was designated pursuant to E.O. 13382 on September 19, 2008 for being owned or controlled by Iran's Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics. SEI engaged in the production of various electronics equipment for the Iranian military, including radars, microwave electron vacuum tubes, naval electronics, avionics and control systems, training simulators, missile guidance technology, and electronic test equipment.
Since at least 2014, on behalf of Wuhan Sanjiang, Shi Yuhua sold SEI navigation-related gyrocompasses valued at hundreds of thousands of dollars, and a variety of highly specialized sensors valued at nearly one million dollars, while obfuscating transactions to avoid detection. Following Wuhan Sanjiang's designation, Shi Yuhua continued business with SEI on behalf of Wuhan Sanjiang.
Iran- and China-Based Procurement Network
OFAC designated Pardazan System Namad Arman (PASNA) pursuant to E.O. 13382 for having provided, or attempted to provide, financial, material, technological, or other support for, or goods or services in support of, Iran's Electronic Components Industries (ECI).
ECI was designated pursuant to E.O. 13382 on July 12, 2012 for being owned or controlled by Iran Electronics Industries (IEI), which was designated pursuant to E.O. 13382 in 2008 for being owned or controlled by Iran's Ministry of Defense for Armed Forces Logistics (MODAFL). ECI conducts work on a variety of military and civilian projects.
Iran-based PASNA has sought to procure various types of lead zirconium tritanate (PZT) items valued at hundreds of thousands of dollars from China-based Bochuang Ceramic, Inc. on behalf of Iran's ECI. PZT items can transmit and receive electrical signals, and are used for anti-submarine warfare, torpedoes, mines, mine countermeasures, aircraft, and ocean surveillance purposes.
Bochuang Ceramic, Inc. is being designated pursuant to E.O. 13382 for having provided, or attempted to provide, financial, material, technological, or other support for, or goods or services in support of, PASNA. China-based Bochuang sought to sell PASNA hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth of PZT material, obfuscating Iran's ECI as the end user of that material by sending shipments to PASNA.
Zhu Yuequn is being designated pursuant to E.O. 13382 for acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, Bochuang. Chinese national and Bochuang representative Zhu Yuequn has facilitated the sale of PZT items between Bochuang and PASNA, ultimately destined for Iran's ECI.
As a result of this action, all property and interests in property of those designated today subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them. In addition, foreign financial institutions that knowingly facilitate significant transactions for, or persons that provide material or certain other support to, the entities designated today risk exposure to sanctions that could sever their access to the U.S. financial system or block their property and interests in property under U.S. jurisdiction.