BREXIT ‘YEAR OF (WAG) THE DOG’ : IF ARTICLE 50 WAS VALID, IT WOULD MEAN ANY POLITICIAN IN EU COULD ARBITRARILY… EXILE ANY… CIVILIAN FROM WITHIN EU, WITHOUT ANY DUE PROCESS, OH HANG ON… (09.01.2018)
... i am so in the front of the queue wanting a D.I.V.O.R.C.E from that, there is no refoulement (to either Australian or the UK) over...
The former Mayor of London who has a long and very dirty track record as a vicious thug spun himself into the full 360 MI6 'spymaster' + politician + journalist.
It is seriously, seriously illegal what they are doing.
There is a very real legal problem because in for example my own case, all Westminster have ever been illegally trying to do is avoid paying out on lawsuits.
The primary and fundamental flaw with Article 50 is that it seeks to bypass a founding failure of the European Union because there is no lawful process for... civilian exiles from... within the European Union.
The politicians in the rest of the EU have no plausible deniability over the malicious use of Article 50 because they have failed to put in place a proper process in advance of any triggering of Article 50, explaining what they would do in the event of a no deal.
It's not just reckless. It is malicious.
If Article 50 was valid which it is not, any politician from anywhere in the European Union could just arbitrarily exile any civilian without any due process.
Oh hang on...
I was exiled precisely because there was no due process.
I get some very odd threatening letters from 'saints' and 'priests' I do not know.
I want to be able to formally renounce two citizenships and formally renounce the name they imposed on me in their whole stolen generation business, and be able to formally use my real name and have real adult relationships because at the core of what they do is juvenile 'Machiavellian' manipulation etc etc and so on and so forth, that I am way past putting up with. There's nothing 'clever' about politicians 'deciding' they will put their own personal interests before anyone else, in what are supposed to be public roles.
They are such bullies and it is a matter of fact there is only one person at the top of Johnson's hate list.
The responsibility free zone of Westminster completely rely on utilising 'mob mentality' behaving like the pack of dogs they are, trying to find 'plausible deniability' there just isn't with Article 50 either.
The thing is they always knew they never had 'any recognized defence in law' they could put before any court.
There's no class or culture involved in anything they do.
Gentlemen they are not.
It's just a nasty, nasty business done by nasty, nasty people.