THE BREXIT BIG BREAKFAST SPINS A MUELLER & FLYNN ‘IMMUNITY’ PLEA BARGAIN : POLITICIANS STRONG-ARM TACTICS "NOTHING IS AGREED UNTIL EVERYTHING IS AGREED" CONTINUES THREATS, INTIMIDATION & CO-ERCION (UNTIL 2ND REFERENDUM, NO DOUBT ON 23 JUNE 2018) (08.12.2017)
The British PM was clearly unlike peaceniks, not going on "a long journey through the night into exile".
... no responsible administrative governance would be spinning this...
The Brexit Big Breakfast is ‘remarkably’ similar to the weasel worded verbiage served up by Mueller (who is a specialist in securing ‘political’ pardons/‘immunity’ in the Unites States) and Flynn where they admitted to something they agreed they wouldn’t publicly admit.
It looks increasingly likely there is not going to be any Brexit (or at least ‘not as we know it’/politicians are spinning it all) so politicians who are clearly up to no good are just buying time before they pull another referendum, no doubt around 23 June 2018.
THE "NOTHING IS AGREED UNTIL EVERYTHING IS AGREED" IS NO MEASURABLE "PROGRESS" WHATSOEVER:
The whole business stinks of ‘strong arm’ tactics trying to cling onto all sorts of 'plausible deniability' including to try and keep anything out of courts.
...more like an 'immunity'/plea bargain...
That's the garbage the EU rubber-stamped as 'progress'.
While the sum total of what politicians have written is so vague it is rendered legally meaningless, it doesn't change that the intent behind what is written could nevertheless only be construed as malevolent.
The fact politicians would even purport they can grant themselves such wide-ranging powers like Brexit is of itself legally dubious and just shameful. If the Brexit document was really legally achievable which it is not, then you can be sure every single self-serving politician in the European Union would be following suit.
NOT IN MY NAME:
The biggest problem politicians really would have, would be claiming in the ECJ that any one of them they ever 'reasonably believed' they could grant themselves what would be such wide ranging retrospective legal authority over anyone.
To even purport anything through the use of 'caveats' does not airbrush over the truth that politicians are illegally using public office to threaten, intimidate and co-erce members of the public with what are 'strong-arm' tactics.
It has taken politicians all this time to even admit that people in Northern Ireland have dual nationality so they were always going to keep all their freedoms in the European Union regardless of if and how they voted in the referendum.
It is really not okay that politicians are publicly so cavalier about people’s freedoms.
Last time anyone looked no politician was a member of the public who had been forced into exile because politicians illegally denied them legal representation.
This is not even remotely amusing:
... the flippancy of politicians/administrators beggars belief...
It’s not the sort of document people should expect from any responsible government.