'EXILE ON MAIN STREET' : A LEGAL FIRST FOR PEACENIK EXILED OUT OF UK INTO EUROPEAN UNION ? (03.12.2017)
I am of course trying to do my very best to lawfully turn corrupt British politicians upside down and shake their pockets of any cash until they are empty.
It remains that whatever I say is ‘without prejudice’ etc, because I have been illegally denied legal representation which forced me out of the UK into exile in the European Union.
The fact politicians always illegally denied me legal representation in the cover up means I was always under duress of which there is considerable evidence over many years.
The legal reality is British (and Australian) governments will always remain legally liable beyond any financial settlement, over what happened that forced me out of the UK into the European Union, that will always remain under the jurisdiction of the ECJ… because I was always illegally denied legal representation.
What politicians !! who publicly said they wanted to a) illegally 'remove' us and b) tortured and c) attempted to murder me d) all while I was illegally denied legal representation, which e) forced me out of the UK into exile in the European Union, is effectively some kind of 'immunity' deal... for themselves !!
The financial settlement which... comes first is not contingent on or related to any 'immunity' deal for... politicians.
BREXITGATE: BRITISH (& AUS) GOVTS WILL REMAIN UNDER JURISDICTION ECJ BECAUSE OF ONGOING -LEGAL LIABILITIES- BEYOND FINANCIAL SETTLEMENT OVER TORTURE & ATTEMPTED MURDER EXILED FEMALE PEACENIK (03.12.2017)
My understanding (and I am not a lawyer and have been illegally denied legal representation) is ... politicians do not 'technically' want the… financial settlement to... ‘change hands’ within the legal jurisdiction of the European Union because it does relate to and include a British politician torturing and attempting to murder me in the UK that the British and Australian governments cannot deny -legal liability- over.
The very real problem with that is that of course... I am a real... exile who is not becoming a tax exile or going anywhere to suit... !! untrustworthy British politicians, of all people.
Most people would know any number of politicians banker friends in Monaco are perfectly capable of opening a bank account in my name, and sending the cheque book and cash-point card with the financial settlement to the address they have previously been instructed to send the settlement to… within the European Union, so that I can then deal with our own arrangements.
I don’t know of or think there is any legal issue with moving a financial settlement… out of Monaco.
Then ‘technically’ I will live in ‘guesthouses’ I will own in several countries outside the UK in the European Union where I will obviously pay taxes and so on, so that first and foremost -I- am protected (and any politicians blushes outside the UK in the European Union are avoided etc)
The main idea is that most of the financial settlement goes to establish a real charitable foundation (ie: peaceniks invest most of the financial settlement in doing our bit to help build a future for young people in the European Union)
I really don’t know at this point what I am going to do about renouncing British and Australian citizenship yet because this will not in any event change the legal liability of both governments even after the financial settlement.
The true legal position is the British and Australian governments can’t deny or avoid legal liability anyway, which has been apparent for a very many years now. What I know is I am obviously not ever returning to the UK or Australia because refoulement would be illegal.
They never had any legal defence to put before any court anywhere over anything.
There is no refoulement:
... it's really shocking that they tortured and attempted to murder me on 4 september 2009 because they knew they didn't have any recognized defence in law to any of lawsuits.... (they already knew they had lost all the cases on and around 4 september 2006 on 13 december 2007)...
"Which part of no didn't they get on 4 September 2006 ?" :
... there was the most appalling cover up over 4 september... 2006 that we won on 13 december 2007.... before 4 september... 2009....
It was really, really shocking what they put me through, illegally denying me legal representation over the torture and attempted murder of me in September 2009.
It was an open 'secret' in Westminster what had happened.
Johnson and Starmer sent the 'police' along on... 18 November 2009 (there had never been any 'search' before a State Opening before) because there was a record IN COURT several days earlier, of my demanding the torture tapes and audio from September 2009.
... johnson and starmer just kept abusing their public positions as mayor of london and director of public prosecutions to threaten and intimidate me etc...
The legal reality is it is a legal impossibility to prosecute me, because of the truly shocking truth of what has really happened, where I have been illegally denied legal representation, so it is something of a legal ‘first’ in the UK in the European Union where it is the British and Australian governments who do have to pick up the bills from my being exiled out of the UK because I am a... peacenik.
It is a legal impossibility to 'prosecute' someone who a) politicians tortured and b) attempted to murder while c) illegally denying legal representation too.
It was the politicians who publicly called for us to be illegally 'removed' !!
A 'TRUCE' OF SORTS:
Since the whole point is I have obviously never had any inclination or intention to do anything criminal anyway, in a sense it would all be more of an uneasy truce because I am the one who is with good reason obviously very wary and mistrusting of politicians, and just want to get on with my life… in peace.
I am not exactly thrilled about any of it, but I want to get on with my own life in a constructive manner.
I don’t think a real charitable foundation investing in doing my bit to help create real jobs for young people in the European Union could possibly be a problem.
It is my personal view that politicians in the UK may well find they want to revisit their referendum that cannot be connected to our exile that came -before- politicians Brexit.