BREXITGATE: 'CATCH-22' WAS BRITISH GOVT ALWAYS -KNEW- ‘NO DUE PROCESS’ NOT A ‘RECOGNIZED DEFENCE IN LAW’ IN HIGH COURT… JURY LAWSUITS 13 DECEMBER 2007 ETC (02.12.2017)
The real 'Catch-22' behind the British (and Australian governments) always illegally trying to violently stop our having High Court jury lawsuits... in the UK was because they always knew the UK had 'no recognized defence' in law to put before any High Court jury.
Everyone knows no due process is 'not a recognized defence' in law.
.... 4 september 2006... there never was any due process... ever...
The government obviously didn't want a multitude of lawsuits (I was unlawfully 'arrested' 48 times) before a High Court... jury... in which the government had no defence of any kind to even begin with.
It was always the case that the government:
a) could not get lawfully get what were malicious prosecutions against us off the ground
ie: 22 February 2006 where it is obvious to any sentient human being there is no due process
b) similarly had 'no recognized defence' in law to put before a High Court jury in lawsuits... against them.
.... we won the central key case over 4 september 2006 (that was spun into all sorts of other malicious prosecutions too) all of which we comprehensively won before and on... 13 december 2007....
All the politicians in Westminster knew exactly what they were doing that escalated into Johnson torturing and attempting to murder me on 4 September 2009 (to try and cover everything up) while -I- was the one illegally denied any and all legal representation that ultimately forced me out of the UK... into exile in the European Union.
... johnson is legally responsible... 4 september 200... 9
I was only illegally denied legal representation because the politicians a) not only did not want to lawfully settle lawsuits, but b) did not want to have to admit legal liability either, which it is also impossible for them to deny.
The politicians are only deliberately continuing to cause the most serious harm possible.