BREXITGATE: BRITISH & AUSTRALIAN GOVTS CAN’T DENY OR AVOID -LEGAL LIABILITY- TORTURE & ATTEMPTED MURDER FEMALE PEACENIK 4 SEPTEMBER 2009 (OVER LAWSUITS) NOW EXILED IN EUROPEAN UNION (02.12.2017)
It's not a complicated 'plot'.
The British and Australian governments are 'legally liable' for Johnson torturing and attempting to murder me on 4 September 2009 because everyone was trying to cover up we had comprehensively won every and all lawsuits there could possibly ever be on 13 December 2007 over 4 September 2006 etc.
The British and Australian governments are both legally liable for a) my being illegally denied legal representation b) over torture and attempted murder c) which inevitably ultimately forced me out of the UK into exile in the European Union.
The British and Australian governments remain legally liable for everything, and there is no refoulement.
... there's quite a long and extensive public record of the violent predators preying on me...
It is impossible to deny politicians are only using the cover of Brexit to (for example) not only try and avoid legal liability but to continue to try and cause the most serious harm possible.
The British and Australian governments can't try and dump legal liability onto another government.
I have been very vulnerable because I have been illegally denied legal representation over a politician torturing and attempting to murder me.
What is supposed to happen is the government put up or shut up and admit liability and pay out.
It obviously becomes 'embarrassing' for a government when a politician is directly legally responsible for torturing and attempting to murder a female peacenik (and because she has won all possible lawsuits)
... politicians never even had any 'plausible deniability'.... groundhog day... 4 september 2006 - 2009
The governments can't deny but don't want to admit 'legal liability'.
In 2012 the government was trying to illegally pressure me while I was illegally denied legal representation, to try and cover up torture etc which led to my being forced into exile.
The predatory government were using the fact I was illegally denied legal representation to try and pressure me to agree to whatever they wanted under the most severe duress.
The real original 'Catch-22' is politicians always knew that had lost any and all High Court jury lawsuits, because everyone knows 'no due process' is 'not a recognized defence' in law in High Court jury lawsuits (ie: politicians always knew they had no defence to run)
The legal reality is the British and Australian governments can't actually deny legal liability over a politician torturing and attempting to murder me which ultimately forced me out of the UK into exile in the European Union.
It has only created all sorts of legal problems... for me, because... Johnson has a whole entourage of lawyers and indeed the same lawyer as the latest Labour Mayor of London Sadiq Khan.