ROYALS REIGN 'CONSTITUTIONAL' TERROR ON DEFENCELESS CATALANS, WHILE 'CONSTITUTIONAL' TERRORIST MURDERS DEFENCELESS CIVILIANS UNITED STATES (02.10.2017)
On 1 October 2017, European royals reigned 'constitutional' terror on defenceless civilians in Catalonia in Europe, while a terrorist murdered defenceless civilians in the United States of Ammo because the gun lobby et al also misrepresent the U.S. 'constitution' too.
... stolen generations...
In the U.S. it was Trump who crossed all red lines, inciting both the Charlottesville and Las Vegas terrorists by publicly stating he could murder anyone and people would still vote for him, without any caveat he should be held accountable in law.
There is no ‘reason’ for government attacks on defenceless civilians anywhere, just as there is no reason for terrorist attacks on defenceless civilians anywhere either, which both just generate corporate profits.
Trump sloped off to a self-congratulatory Nuremberg rally after Charlottesville just like the Tories are having theirs now.
It is a matter of fact that in the United States no member of the public actually saw the shooter doing the whole grassy knoll routine hidden away in a building while the politicians and press [who in the UK include politicians] write any script they choose.
... everyone knew what trump publicly stated was illegal, just like when cameron was even more specific, on 19 july 2009, saying he could illegally'remove' we peaceniks, without any accompanying caveat of politicians being subject to the rule of law...
The legal reality is when politicians falsely claim they can be above the law [like unelected monarchy] so outside any checks and balances and safeguards that exist to protect everyone, there is no rational reason to believe they are -truthful- about anything.
Let us be honest that the gun lobby is not selling lethal weapons to the public to defend themselves under the 'constitution' from the... government.
All 'ideologies' are uncomfortable that most people are united in their opposition to corporate war which is a good starting point, including to explore how the system really works.
... trump evil... gun stocks up...
If people's 'ideology' doesn't include as a starting point really being opposed to the torture and murder of defenceless civilians, then it's not really ever going to be worth even considering.
The reality is if you do not stand up for your own and others rights, for the benefit of everyone, there are neither.
The UK government made the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 specifically against me, dishonestly purporting they could retrospectively give the entire state immunity from anything as they a) sought to give politicians immunity over torture and attempted murder/murder b) rolled out Police Commissioner's across the country and c) illegally denied access to courts to bring lawsuits.
[When they tortured and attempted to murder me in 2009 this was because they had exhausted any ability to try and stop lawsuits against them, holding them legally accountable]
The Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 was a smokescreen really because the government could not use it to take me to court when they rolled it out on 16 January 2012, and so therefore could not lawfully use it against anyone else either.
There were no checks and balances in what was a purely an Enabling Act.
It is a matter of fact, there were no terror attacks in the UK on my seven plus year watch in Parliament Square, Central London because the government were too busy trying to illegally 'remove' we peaceniks !! .
We did prove that 'constitutional' monarchy is incompatible with the EU legal order despite unprecedented opposition from royals, politicians, media barons etc etc etc etc.
The only reason people are suprised by the positive difference they can make, is because politicians and media barons obviously do no broadcast the truth.
All reasonable and rational law abiding civilians do know that the fact anything may be written down by anyone in a 'constitution' or 'legislation' does not necessarily mean it is compatible with the real democracy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law.
My nephew was murdered in 1999 by a red-neck copper's son waving around his 'constitutional' right to shoot at anything that moved with a high powered rifle. So the copper's son was only actually found guilty of manslaughter on 22 May 2000 [which he had the nerve to appeal to the Supreme Court in Melbourne, Victoria, 13 December 2000 and then !! the High Court in Hobart, Tasmania 5 April 2001] after never even apologizing because he could not even be bothered identifying his target was a human.
There was much more to it than meets the eye.
18 November 1999:
... the copper's son hid behind the government were grossly negligent too, because they had recklessly included a residential area, that had a children's camp !! in the shooting 'zone' too...
A consequence of that 'case' was a 'moratorium' on shooting in that area, to try and hide that in any true legal sense:
a) the shooter was really guilty of murder because he did not even bother to identify his target, which went beyond mere manslaughter
b) the government were an 'accessory' to what was really murder because they had 'authorized' a shooting 'zone' that included a residential area and children's camp !!
...19 february 1999... a jury...
... 13 december 2000...
'State Opening' 18 November 2009:
... 18 november 2009.... (after they tortured and attempted to murder me in september 2009)..
... 13 december 2007 we had won (same day they signed article 50 enabling act lisbon treaty)...
... 19 february 2008.. royals attempt land grab... [19 february 2016 cameron triggers referendum... ]
The people in the U.S. who really oppose the shocking murder of defenceless civilians in Las Vegas do oppose the governments murder of defenceless civilians everywhere too.