KING IN WAITING & CAMZILLA WOULD LOSE REFERENDUM ON MONARCHY & COMMONWEALTH 'LEGAL' SYSTEM NOT COMPATIBLE WITH EU LEGAL ORDER (27.09.2017)
There’s no doubt Two World wars were waged against civilian populations that saw millions upon millions of law abiding civilians slaughtered across Europe, because royals a) knew they were on their way out and b) wanted their British colony of Israel in the Middle East.
... monarchy and military dictators all have the same false sense of entitlement to unfettered power...
The ‘British’ royals were Hitler’s biggest fans while their Kaiser chillaxed in Holland expecting to be returned to power, because the brutal military dictator Franco did indeed restore the Spanish royals. The Dutch royals decamped to the UK, while Victor Emmanuel III who along with MI5 installed Mussolini, saw the Italian royals abolished after the war when Mussolini fell.
The French didn’t have any royals so they got Vichy instead and indeed everyone including the Russian government collaborated with Hitler at one time or another, including of course Neville Chamberlain.
30.09.1938 BBC: PEACE FOR OUR TIME
There is no other way of explaining the political and military 'incompetence' of Dunkirk other than it was planned all along.
Churchill tried to 'gloss' over Dunkirk with baloney about the Battle of Britain, many years before the Tories showed their true contempt for civilians, building their grotesque shrine in Green Park to Bomber Harris bombing the... civilian population in Dresden.
Bomber Harris was a repugnant war criminal who stated he put whatever the military wanted, before civilian lives.
The war propaganda likes to 'gloss' over that the war mongering 'British' Saxe-Coburgs changed their names to Windsor early on during the whole whitewash in 1917 like the Belgian Saxe-Coburgs did too because of course they would not have won any referendums.
The 'Greek' royals were back and forth to and from the UK like yo-yo's, and very friendly with the Nazis too, while the unelected 'Grand Duke' of Luxembourg 'went abroad' for World War Two until it was time for him to be safely re-installed by the 'British' monarchy, and so on and round and round the royal racket goes.
The Two World Wars saw the royals remain by and large untouched, and at most only abolished afterwards, except for Russia's Nicholas II, with speculation from time to time that Putin the Pretender might nevertheless restore the Romanovs.
The fact that the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand was used as the false pretext to wage World War One is just a reminder that war propaganda took over in the sheer absence of any kind of responsible administrative governance, including among any of the inbred royals.
To this day the greatest problem with European royalty remains that when you put the propaganda spun on their behalf to one side, they are always war mongers who never support peace.
THE 'EU PRESIDENCY': UNELECTED ROYALS & COVERT OPERATIONS.
They spun the old Grand Duke of Luxembourg and MI6 13 January & 21 June routine in December 2012-2013 including the 'illegal wire tapping of two citizens' that again rips off what really happened in the UK in 2010, to parachute Juncker into the EU Presidency, while Barroso was paid off by Goldman Sachs.
It highlights the conundrum surrounding the EU Commission President and the President of the EU Council who are supposed to just be administrators getting a nod and a wink from whoever -while- there are still unelected royals who are all related etc, meddling.
There is only a facade of democracy in countries with unelected royals etc that -then- undermines the administrative functioning of the EU because the royals are not subject to any electoral process whereby they can be voted out nationally. In the case of the UK, this is all made far worse because it involves the unelected House of Lords too.
Most of the worst MP's etc continue in the unelected House of Lords in the UK.
The royalty who are not in any sense of the word 'administrators' could not possibly claim they support democracy or they would have abolished their own roles !!
ASIO Assange who was parachuted into... London in 2010 with the CIA 'Chelsea' Manning and then Snowden spin in 2013 too -all- rip off the real dates of what really happened in the UK on 13 January, 25 May and 21 June 2010 with the MI5 Democracy Village that included the 'news' media like the Daily Mail. In fact, ASIO Assange who the MSM have spun uncensored for years which is not what really happens, has had a whole entourage of lawyers at the very same time real peaceniks in the UK, have been illegally denied legal representation.
... 2008 - 2012... Juncker was parachuted into the Presidency of the EU Commission after spinning the Grand Duke and VITOL MI6 covert operations ...
The covert operations with the British where the spooks only ever spin:
... 'illegal wire tapping' of 'two citizens'...
... 13 January and 21 June... spying scandal 'breaks' government...
The spin was just the means to parachute Juncker into the Presidency:
... the media won't ever go anywhere near the truth about anything going on...
The global corporations like VITOL [annual turnover $ 270 billion laundered through Swiss vaults] are only able to exploit the UK taxpayer and through the UK elsewhere, growing into such behemoths because there is such a weak what is really only a facade of democracy with unelected royals and the unelected House of Lords [and their City of London etc]
The Americans only showed up in Europe at the end of World War Two to showboat to Berlin.
When the Berlin Wall fell years later after more of the phoney divide and rule, the Stasi still rule over Russia with Putin the Pretender at the helm.
When you look beyond the narrow scope of myopic war propaganda you can see unelected royals would not last long with annual referendums over monarchy where there is no pretense of any government, or with a referendum with every election where there is a pretense of a government alongside monarchy.
It is obvious to most people that the King in waiting and Camzilla in the UK who have even more pretensions about meddling than the matriarch, would not last beyond one referendum because they are unsurprisingly so unpopular.
There’s only a surprising number of countries who still have an unelected monarchy whose sense of entitlement is so extraordinary because it is not based on any decent and civilized reality.
There is always a cognitive disconnect when controlled opposition in the UK go on about for example the unelected House of Saud without looking a little closer to home.
The unelected House of Lords only exist to try and make the unelected royals who are actually the signature tune on all the legislation look good.
The unelected British monarchy can still overthrow a democratically elected government in [for example] Australia in the far from Commonwealth and did so with the Whitlam government.
It was only possible for that to happen because the far from Commonwealth does not have a legal system that is compatible with the legal order in the European Union.
The British and Australian 'governments' are the same as and an extension of one another really.
Civilians lives are more important than the whims of the revolving doors of self-serving corporate governments and unelected royalty.
When there was the whole 'royal' case against us in 2010 - 2011 that the Attorney General didn’t dare show his face at, we were out in the corridor chatting one day and some snotty nosed lawyers told us to hush because it was a ‘historic’ case they were trying to listen to through the door [because the court was full]. I just told them we were the ‘defendants’ in the royal facade that was stretching credibility because they had a far from 'legal' [Commonwealth] system, which they didn’t take kindly to my pointing out at all because it is true.
The British government's royal spin did the far from Commonwealth 'legal' system against us and we did the EU legal order right back at them, which is how we forced the repeal of the Spanish Inquisition against us that was incompatible with the EU legal Order, which is what the case was really all about.
There were a lot of disclosures the state illegally with-held including no doubt the spider King's memos because a royal lawyer did come along to speak to Brian and myself etc etc. Brian and I hadn't known anything definitively until 18 June 2010 about the attempted land grab by the Crown that had been going on behind our backs since 19 February 2008.
The whole state apparatus was literally [illegally] used against us to try and stop the repeal of corporate legislation.
We are the only law abiding civilians in the UK, without any legal training or legal representation, to have repealed any War on Terror legislation.
It is of course seriously incompatible with the EU legal Order to illegally deny legal representation to a law abiding civilian the entire apparatus of the state is illegally being used against.
We repealed the multi-billion dollar corporate legislation being violently used against us, for the benefit of everyone, and regardless of the opposition from royals, politicians and media barons etc etc etc.
No-one however should ever have to go through what we did which only happened because there is only a facade called 'democracy' in the UK.
There's a very illuminating recording from 9 March 2006 with me asking the police to explain their due 'process' with them spending almost two hours talking all around everything but, because they all -knew- the legislation was really just the false pretext for state violence... and we are talking about what was... years of state violence.
The recording shows very clearly I said and did the right things that any law abiding civilian would normally say and do, while the state's intent was always only entirely malicious and any respect of any kind for law abiding civilians was wholly absent.
This is and will always be completely unacceptable because it has nothing whatsoever to do with responsible administrative governance.
The far from Commonwealth legal system [and it's Privy Council] is not the same as or compatible with the EU legal order.
This is unsurprisingly a Brexit Boris City of London funded racket:
... just another stage brexit boris who needs to resign now, hides behind that include some of his equally corrupt financial backers like mr moynihan ... and a bent lawyer alan halsall from the british german forum... that includes mandelson etc...
The Boris built Brexit stage is actually completely unlawful and the media know it, because it constitutes very serious abuse of public office to engage in the continuing harassment and bullying of law abiding civilians.
The 'Garden bridge':
... 22 june 2017 & 'lord' mandelson et al... the legal reality is when boris resigns brexit ends because he built the stage to illegally harass and bully law abiding civilians to hide what he is legally responsible for doing...
He's obviously been going through his rolodex shelling out brown envelopes laundered through his 'garden bridge' etc.
You only have to look at the deceit of Brexit Boris & Co spinning their 17 million fascists who are basically royalists too as a 'majority' compared to the legal reality that 29 million registered voters who are law abiding civilians voted for the EU legal order.
Boris' Brexit proves that once again there's no difference between Labour and Tory/Lib Dems.
There’s an obvious connection between monarchy and military dictators because they all have the same false sense of entitlement to unfettered power.
It is only law abiding civilians who ever push for an EU legal order which needs to be overhauled too with civilian juries.
The real democracy is the peace and harmony of the rule of law, so it is simple logic that people can make the most difference by trying to improve legal systems for the benefit of everyone, rather than waste everyone's time and real lives with the politics of propaganda.