WIKI-WOO: CLINTON TRIES TO DISTANCE HERSELF FROM PUTIN & ASIO ASSANGE & $20+ MILLION AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT LAUNDERED THROUGH CLINTON FOUNDATION (20.10.2016)
Hilary Clinton was wearing her dodgy 'lawyer' hat for the final U.S. Presidential debate, where Trump is just the minder in the whole 'Sopranos' double-act.
... the 'lawyer' who covered up her husband's genocide of 500,000 iraqi children...
Firstly Ms Clinton ‘the lawyer’ tried to distance herself from Putin and ASIO Assange in a not very convincing display of utter mendacity.
It is impossible for Clinton to claim as she did, that ASIO Assange is a purely Russian operation, because she knows it was the war mongering Guardian in London who did the grand launch of the whole Wiki-woo media roadshow in 2010 that even Murdoch has openly jumped on board with now.
Everyone knows the war mongering Guardian don't launch any media roadshow with anyone who is trying to end corporate war.
Of course the U.S. government naturally don’t want to be embroiled in our High Court jury lawsuit over Westminster and Moscow collaborating in the maelstrom of the MI5 ‘Democracy Village’ in London between 2010-2012.
It obviously wasn't a 'co-incidence' that the war mongering Guardian launched ASIO Assange [I am an Australian-British dual national] in London around the same time.
A group of spies from MI5 'Democracy Village' surrounded us trying to hijack and smash our long standing Parliament Square Peace Campaign in London, while ASIO Assange who had never been any part of the anti-war movement in the UK, was suddenly parachuted into London by the war mongering Guardian, to play to the cameras.
Just a co-incidence ?
I think not.
The scandal of Westminster’s a) MI5 ‘Democracy Village’ of all sorts is bad enough on it’s own without b) having the additional problem of Putin the Pretender in the mix c) leading to the unavoidable conclusion they were all involved in planning the ‘Arab Spring’.
The UN Security Council had lost the propaganda war over Iraq because opposition to the Iraq War was not led by the political classes and their pulp fiction.
The evidence is they had hoped to hijack and smash our Parliament Square Peace Campaign, so they could revert to the phoney 'Cold War' narrative.
Clinton came, saw and laughed while... Brian sadly died in 2011.
... brian haw, parliament square, london june 2nd 2001...
Their latest Wiki-woo 'October Revolution' is an obvious circle jerk among Iraq War criminals and their apologists.
Putin the Pretender is singing the same tune as Murdoch doing the whole Trump panjandrum, while Murdoch like Ben Goldsmith is a contributor to the Clinton Foundation, which really is nothing more than a global war propaganda racket.
A problem arises with the reality the Australian government happened to launder $20+ million through the global multi-million dollar Clinton Foundation war propaganda racket.
Al-Capone Clinton the ‘lawyer’ ridiculously tried to claim there was no evidence that the Clinton Foundation has acted illegally, while Trump yet again played the distraction canard.
In ‘the Sopranos’ double act Trump was making a lot of white noise about the Saudis et al and not the much larger contribution from the Australian government or indeed the then even larger contribution from the Goldsmith front in London, neither of which he mentioned.
... there's just no difference in the revolving doors... putin supping with trump's 'adviser'....
The whole Clinton email psyop is about trying to disguise that the UN Security Council governments are all behind the ASIO Assange and CIA Snowden hoax 'leaks' in the whole bogus 'War On Terror'.
... all the same... trumps 'adviser' was obama's 'adviser' ...
Of course there is a very big difference between what people can get away with saying while lying to camera in the hallowed whorehouses of war propaganda, compared to being before a High Court jury.
The legal reality is the evidence of fraud is very straightforward because tax revenues are being diverted to a ‘charity’ when the evidence is the money is really being used to illegally generate war propaganda to increase corporate profits.
The Clinton Foundation is part of a far wider problem, like Blair’s ‘Faith Foundation’ that he is allegedly ‘winding down’.
The UN Security Council’s socially constructed lies about the political classes and their pulp fiction they put about for public consumption are just so false.
War propaganda is a very serious crime that has nothing whatsoever to do with ‘free speech’.
We quite incredibly beat Westminster's global multi-billion dollar ‘free speech’ ban war propaganda racket in the UN Security Council’s bogus ‘War on Terror’.
All we have ever consistently practiced is the rule of law because we really do want all people to be able to live in peace together.
Clinton is not credible when she says she doesn't want to keep occupying Iraq, while saying in the same sentence that she does want to occupy Syria with 'no fly zones'.
The UN Security Council presumably want to carve out a whole 'Kurdish' swathe across Iraq and Syria, just so that all the war racketeers can keep lining their own back pockets.
I can't see how they can spin that one myself.
If only Iraqis who have suffered from so many years of war could just be left in peace to live their lives like other oil rich countries in the Middle East do.
The Clintons were part of the whole gang who thought nothing of the Genocide of 500,000 Iraqi children during the illegal sanctions before the Iraq War in 2003...