IRAQ WAR: BRITISH WAR CRIMINAL DAVID DAVIS GOES TO DAMASCUS, WHILE BRITISH DEATH SQUADS STALK BEACH UMBRELLAS... AGAIN (17.04.2016)
The unelected ‘British’ Queen who has a penchant for fraudulent land grabs is the real ’sponsor’ of the United Nations Security Council weapons supply line, that the ‘monarchy’ set up after creating the on-shore ‘tax haven’ of the City of London and the far from ‘Commonwealth’.
It took us years of hard work in very difficult circumstances to prove corporate legislation did not and does not stop the High Court jury lawsuit [that is covered by ‘back-up’ lawsuits] that can end all corporate legislation, sanctions, resolutions and most importantly occupations.
... most people know the long infamous British death squads who resorted to dishonestly claiming the British corporate state can violently attack and maliciously 'prosecute' people over the alleged 'crime' of being in possession of a beach umbrella during their bogus 'war on terror' are the phoney 'Islamic State' et al
In 2014, the British MI5 'Democracy Village' deaths squads were illegally supposedly going to Beirut and only made it as far as... France.
It is very sly of the British Parliament to try and re-locate their death squads in international waters to try and add yet another layer of 'plausible deniability' that doesn't really legally exist.
The 'idea' that British death squads could just traipse into any country they like on the pretext a British person was in that country during an attack by the phoney 'Islamic State' who are without any doubt bought and paid NATO mercenaries, is just preposterous.
It is a matter of admitted fact really that the United Nations Security Council weapons supply line of mass disinformation knew that UN resolution 1441 did not and could not possibly authorize the British Parliament to unilaterally invade Iraq.
... 2012... another world first: cojone-free british deaths squads and their no kidding... bogus 'war on terror' being in possession of a beach umbrella 'crime'...
[I am not kidding that I am the first person in the world to actually be maliciously prosecuted over the alleged 'crime' of being in possession of a beach umbrella during their bogus 'war on terror' where the British Parliament really are just viciously trying to stop our... lawsuit that would end the occupation of Iraq...]
So the British Parliament of all political shades lied and said any legal challenges to the occupation of Iraq by the British Parliament had to be brought in... British courts, while it is a matter of well established fact they are only using state violence to try and stop legal challenges in British courts, that would end the occupation of Iraq and much else.
It is a matter of fact that the British Parliament were only trying to stop a legal challenge from us, because the now British Prime Minister Cameron publicly stated for all and sundry on July 19th 2009, that he would use the entire apparatus of the state to ‘remove’ us anywhere, because we do the certainty of the rule of law.
september 4th 2006 ... this is british death squads trying to murder me to try and stop the High Court jury lawsuit that will end corporate war
[On July 19th 2007, I was literally astonishingly kidnapped during proceedings in a court, on the basis of a bogus warrant, where I nevertheless subsequently won everything where they obviously didn't want me giving evidence etc. They didn't wait to kidnap me outside the court but actually used a bogus warrant during live proceedings in the court !!]
... january 31st 2007... the second murder attempt the british death squads made against me
july 19th 2007... can you imagine the 'legal' trouble the british parliament are in over literally kidnapping a law abiding civilian [me] from inside one court on the false pretext they were trying to bring me before another court with a bogus warrant ??
december 13th 2007:... this is the british death squads legally completely fucked over all their incredible vicious and violent lies [on the same day article 50 of treaty of lisbon, that has become the brexit panjandrum is signed]
The reality is the British death squads of all sorts were always going after our Parliament Square Peace Campaign because we uphold the certainty of the rule of law.
... september 4th 2006: of course the british death squads illegally refuse to hand over the audio they edited out of the cctv etc etc etc
A High Court jury would conclude based on 'records' that even when the 'police' made them up afterwards still do not make any coherent sense of any kind any which way anyone looks at them, because the British death squads intended to murder me on September 4th 2006.
When the death squads failed to murder me they had to try and cobble together some records of some kind to try and explain how I ever came to be in police 'custody'.
It would be impossible for any British ‘politician’ to pretend that they did not know they were trying to stop a lawsuit that would end the occupation of Iraq etc.
The reality is the war and occupation in Iraq only 'spilled' over into Syria because the occupation of Iraq has not ended.
Heaven forbid anyone might vote for a President who doesn't have a problem with anyone going to the beach...
... in all legal terms... david davis is a war criminal who has only ever been trying to trying cover up our lawsuit in the UK
On February 7th 2007, the same Iraq War criminal David Davis came up to me at the Channel Four 'Political Awards' that Brian won [this was after illegal 'bail conditions' imposed by District Judge Michael Snow in the cases outlined above, were lifted against me for several hours in the linked malicious prosecutions I inevitably won] and said to me "if the British Parliament cared [about any civilian lives] they would have to shut down".
Remember that David Davis made a point of coming up to me and saying this the week after the British Parliament tried to murder me for the second time.
Davis has never changed his tune and has never worked with law abiding civilians.
Anything he ever says is purely for public consumption to try and save his own lying arse etc.
Of course many people know, the Belgium Parliament shut down for 541 days and no-one gave a shit, because while administrators could keep everything ticking over, no new corporate legislation etc could be made.
It is reasonable to presume that British war criminals have always been hoping for a Syrian 'Constitution' that resembles their illegal sectarian 'Constitution' in Iraq.
It is a matter of fact that the Syrian government have successfully defended all the major cities in western Syria where most civilians have always lived, while they have found themselves in the position of having to buy lethal weapons to defend their administrative state from what is really one weapons supply line.
Only the Syrian government know why they have not joined the International Criminal Court to try and strengthen the certainty of the rule of law and the Syrian government are not occupied so they do not face the same difficulties all Iraqi civilians face.
The Kurdish sectarian canard has long been waved around as a bargaining chip that belies a few Kurdish 'political' leaders don't mean much in any legal reality.
On May 23rd 2013, the Turkish 'Kurdish' leader Demirtas infamously claimed that "Kurds were Turkey's luck " [in Syria] which in a court of law, would in legal terms translate into being a slightly more than 'opportunistic' call for Genocide in Syria, which is absolutely unlawful.
One question most people ask is was Ocalan always a United Nations Security Council Gladio stirring the pot, because what is really at issue is administrative governance not phoney sectarianism ?
Lethal weapons really don't grow on trees.
The British Parliament had long run an illegal ‘intelligence’ operation against our defence-less civilian resistance, to illegally try and stop our lawsuit to end the occupation of Iraq etc.
It is without any doubt absolutely unlawful for the British ‘intelligence’ agencies et al to run operations against law abiding civilians upholding the certainty of the rule of law in courts of law.
The key words are there is our lawsuit in the High Court.
What was actually also discovered was that the Russian government who always pose as phoney ‘opposition’ with all manner of gatekeepers like Corbyn et al, while also sitting on the European Courts were also involved in British ‘intelligence’ operations like the MI5 ‘Democracy Village’.
Of course there is not a member of the British public who is remotely surprised at an ‘intelligence’ operation being run against us, who would really be surprised by the involvement of the Russian pretenders either.
It is just another huge scandal that the British Parliament were running an intelligence operation with the Russian government.
In fact it was opposition to the Iraq War that swept away a century of war propaganda and exposed there has never really been any difference between all United Nations Security Council ‘politics’ which is a just a spin off from unelected ‘royalty’ really.
Contrary to the public perception of ‘intelligence services’ that has arisen because it is the intelligence services planting the propaganda, ‘intelligence’ operations are actually quite overt and only hidden by ‘news’ agencies because they obviously work with ‘intelligence’ agencies to plant and disseminate propaganda.
The bogus ‘war on terror’ is the most recent example.
Our own law abiding civilian resistance to the British corporate state arose because while we are obviously not ideologically driven in our upholding the certainty of the rule of law, they are not ideologically driven about being on the wrong side of that certainty of the rule of law.
The only purpose of the colonial ‘intelligence’ agency moniker is to hide all state criminality.
15.04.2016 JEWISH CHRONICLE: BRITISH BORN MOSSAD LEADER & 'SOFA' LAWYER ON 9/11 EFRAIM HELEVY SPINS MORE LIES ABOUT WHAT HE KNOWS IS THE CERTAINTY OF THE RULE OF LAW
The British born Mossad [like the British born ASIO et al] like the made in the UK Israel always knew [for example] that one vote for one person in the European military garrison called Israel/Occupied Palestine would return Arab administrative rule, which is hardly a big deal.
A well known MI5 gatekeeper of 7/7 Nafeez Ahmed completely exposed himself by maliciously trying to cover up that MI5 et al had tried to murder me, because our lawsuit began on May 23rd 2006 [when the same 7/7 Gold Commander Asst. Commissioner Allison unlawfully arrested me knowing he could not find anything to charge me]
Ahmed who is a bought and paid bogus 'war on terror' propagandist goes into a long bogus 'war on terror' discourse that any analysis by anyone can really see is all about him trying to 'hide' who he works for.
... weasel words.... MI5's 7/7 gatekeeper nafeez ahmed [and his british death squads including gareth newnham & co] who have always been trying to stop my lawsuit against the same 7/7 gold commander who unlawfully arrested me less than a year later on may 23rd 2006 in a massive police raid, has never been a credible source of any information
Of course no credible person who pretended they were ‘investigating’ 7/7 or 9/11 [which is what 'Dr' Nafeez Ahmed dishonestly claimed he was doing] would be trying to silence the one person moi who had a High Court jury lawsuit against the same 7/7 Gold Commander Asst. Commissioner Allison and Co.
MI5 Nafeez Ahmed [along with the Guardian] illegally published what he knew was a lie about my unlawful arrest on May 25th 2010 using members of his MI5 ‘Democracy Village’ after he knew I had filed a lawsuit against MI5 in the High Court.
What Ahmed and the Guardian published was a deliberate and real Contempt of the High Court because he was purposefully attempting to obstruct the administration of justice by publishing malicious lies.
A High Court jury would agree that MI5 Nafeez Ahmed among much dishonestly tried to conceal:
a) [as our video footage shows] that he, like the BBC and Guardian were liars over my unlawful arrest at the State Opening on May 25th 2010
29.11.2015 VIDEO: UNWARRANTED: POLICE STATE OPENING OF PARLIAMENT [ROUGH CUT]
b) while he was hiding behind the Metropolitan Police illegally refusing to hand over to me, the CCTV footage of their torturing me while trying to murder me on September 4th 2009 at Belgravia Police Station, along with the interrogation tape of what I said that needs to go before a High Court jury.
One of a number of obvious reasons the corporate state use the same dates for many of their crimes like trying to murder me twice, once on September 4th 2006 and then again on September 4th 2009, is to try and confuse people etc etc etc.
[After 48 unlawful arrests and all the accompanying 'uses' of that, the 'calendar' was inevitably a little full]
Of course MI5 Nafeez Ahmed is just another troll who doesn't want me having a High Court jury because he is only guaranteed to be out of a career as a 7/7 gatekeeper.
The real underlying ‘argument’ they are always trying to disguise is over the true nature of administrative governance that cannot include corporate legislation, sanctions, resolutions and occupations that are mutually exclusive with the certainty of the rule of law.
The reality is uncivilized British ‘politics’ and ‘news’ media do not want to let go of the biggest lie that they started that hides corporate legislation, sanctions, resolutions and occupations are mutually exclusive with the certainty of the rule of law.
The ‘intelligence’ operation against us began to unravel when we finally managed to do what everyone had always been trying to stop us doing, which was file a long-standing lawsuit in the British High Court on August 17th 2011, through a lawsuit that was maliciously brought against us.
This was while I was illegally imprisoned without legal representation or trial while the decisive battle of Tripoli took place in Libya.
The British Parliament only keep on highlighting it is legal challenges from us, in courts of law they do not want.
In all legal terms, there needed to be that paper trail showing the unelected Queen could not just make and keep any land grab the monarchy et al liked etc, which the lawsuit is.
It’s obviously not illegal to bring a lawsuit before a High Court jury, but it is seriously illegal to try and stop that lawsuit that is obviously based on fact and law and brought in good faith.
I have been unlawfully arrested 48 times etc because the British Parliament of all 'political' shades have been violently trying to stop that lawsuit.
[There are a number of ‘back-up’ lawsuits, so to speak, so it is impossible to knock them all out]
On October 7th 2011, which was the tenth anniversary of the invasion of Afghanistan, the High Court were forced to confirm that even if the High Court lawsuit against us had to be dropped...
[which it was on May 4th 2012 when their MI5 'Democracy Village' who were never going to be able to challenge our lawsuit had to run like shit]
... our lawsuit which would have to be heard before a High Court jury remains, which is the legal reality.
Perhaps the British government Taliban chose that date because they knew as they always had that all their corporate lies would be exposed before a High Court jury.
The illegal corporate legislation used against our Parliament Square Peace Campaign inevitably fell away, although new corporate legislation was invented and the same state violence used to try and stop that falling away too.
HOWEVER...the new legislation could not disguise the truth of the existing lawsuit to end the occupation of Iraq.
In June 2013, it was admitted that the French government had known that the British government wanted to overthrow President Assad and had said nothing.
This is all very odd when you think about colonial history and the unelected ‘British’ Queen’s property portfolio.
It is a matter of the most important legal facts, that the British Parliament could never produce any legal grounds for invading Syria.
It is very strange however that the British would contemplate straying into French colonial territory so to speak, when you stop and think about it.
In any event, in September 2013 the British Parliament backed out of overtly invading Syria.
In July 2014, Saleem al-Saqqa then forced Palestinian ‘politicians’ to join the ICC to try and save civilian lives.
26.07.2014 PALESTINIAN GOVT. FILE GROUNDBREAKING COMPLAINT AGAINST ISRAEL, AT INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.
When the Baghdad government then brought a legal challenge in 2014 over stolen Iraqi oil that led to the invention of the ‘Islamic State’ moniker that British death squads and their Kurdish ‘political’ leaders et al hide behind.
It is colonial rule 101 that a sectarian canard of one kind or another is always waved around.
In September 2014, the U.S. President when pushed eventually hid behind the Khorasan moniker at the United Nations Security Council to pretend he had authorisation [while Congress was conveniently not sitting] to attack Syria, after the initial air strikes in Syria had allegedly begun.
The New York Times found themselves ducking and diving all over the place over that lie.
23.09.2014 OBAMA'S UNDECLARED WAR ON SYRIA: ILLEGAL AIRSTRIKES, ARE PRELUDE TO "NO FLY ZONE" & "REGIME CHANGE"
On January 7th 2015, the first terror attack happened in Paris which curiously only brought world leaders swarming to bizarrely pose as ‘protesters’ while of course all they really did [like all too many of their fake campaigns do] was stand in an alleyway posing for the quick media photo-shoot.
[MI5 ‘Democracy Village’ who typically recruited many hardened criminals, which is how ‘governments’ and their ‘intelligence agencies’ try and maintain ‘plausible deniability’ would always wheel out the ring-leaders who pose as fake campaigners, for the media photo-shoot too]
In February 2015, the resolutions against the Iranian government inevitably fell away in British courts.
23.02.2015 IRANIANS CORNER BRITISH PARLIAMENT IN COURTS, WHILE NEW ZEALAND CHEESE SELLING SURRENDER MONKEYS SELL OUT TO EU TERROR...AGAIN
Later in 2015, the French ‘Socialist’ government then started very strangely babbling on about air strikes in Syria.
In September 2015 the French government [as indeed did the Australian government, who said what they said outside any parliamentary process at all] told the very tall tale pretending that they could attack Syria because they had been invited to ‘defend’ Iraq.
09.09.2015 QUELLE EST LA BASE JURIDIQUE LÉGALE POUR INTERVENIR MILITAIREMENT EN SYRIE PAR FRANCOIS HOLLANDE ET LAURENT FABIUS ?
This was all very ‘peculiar’ because of course the French government had not been involved in the war on Iraq in 2003, but you can see begin to see where the war propaganda is heading and what it is trying to hide.
All this war propaganda brings us back to the British Parliament’s lies over the Iraq War.
Both the French and Australian governments are hiding behind the British government, as indeed are the Russian government really.
The shocking terror attack in Paris in November 2015 then led to the French government imposing martial law, which in far from legal terms, means they have just suspended any rule of law.
In far from legal terms, this would presumably springboard any legal challenges directly into the ECHR at Strasbourg, because martial law means there is no real system of law in France any more.
Of course it would be impossible for the French Parliament to even try arguing in any court of law that while they opposed the Iraq War because they knew it was illegal, they now relied on hiding behind the same British Parliament who illegally occupied Iraq, to conduct air-strikes in Syria.
These are legal contortions too far that are really about the British Parliament.
In October 2015 the Russian pretenders inevitably started grandstanding from a comfortable height in Syria.
01.10.2015 OPERATION 'SAVING FACE': RUSSIAN AIRSTRIKES START CLEANING UP TERRORISM 'FAILURE' OF UNITED NATIONS 'SECURITY' COUNCIL IN SYRIA
In December 2015, the British Parliament of Iraq War criminals unsurprisingly preposterously claimed that they had an unknown right to vote to conduct air-strikes in Syria in ‘defence’ of Iraq.
05.12.2015 NATO’S CAMERON & CORBYN ‘FREE VOTE’ WAR PROPAGANDA TRADUCES CERTAINTY OF RULE OF LAW WITH A CORPORATE POLITICAL ‘LOTTERY’ OVER LIFE
This brought us the full circle of the British Parliament of all political shades relying on state violence to try and stop legal challenges in courts of law in the UK and Iraq too.
A BBC 'World' journalist called Gabriel Gatehouse literally repeatedly harrassed me, because he ridiculously complained in 2011 when I did not want to speak to him, that I was as difficult as Moqtadr al-Sadr.
Yet all anyone is saying that they won't tell the truth about is the British government need to end the occupation of Iraq, because it is illegal which all law abiding civilians everywhere know is true.
All far from legal roads lead back to the unelected 'British' Queen who does make fraudulent land claims along with her British Parliament of war criminals of all 'political' shades.
... the unelected 'british' queens 'property portfolio' is a very obvious fraud...we did become the 'experts' on land law after beating the old crone's land grab in parliament square for goodness sakes
In February 2016 the British Parliament launched their Article 50 Brexit panjandrum for June 23rd 2016, to try and buy time because all law abiding civilians fingers are pointing at the British Parliament of all political shades.
In March 2016 another terror attack took place in Brussels which only keeps reminding people that the intelligence agencies admitted they conducted Gladio terror attacks in Europe and how 9/11 that had nothing to do with Afghani people led to the invasion of Afghanistan on the way to Iraq.
This in returns reminds us of other British intelligence assets like the anti-Syrian government war propagandist Robert Fisk sitting with the Saudi Bin Liner bagman with both telling tall tales.
clickbait 'traffic': all war propaganda is criminal because it is expressly intended to lead to the murder of defenceless civilians.
Clearly contrary to Mr Fisk’s latest tall tale about trade unions where he 'forgets' to mention trade unions are completely controlled...in the UK [indeed the British trade-unions collaborated with the Tory and Labour governments in corporate legislation targeting us that all unions were exempt from] most law abiding civilians know colonial masters have their colonial puppets.
It certainly didn't escape anyone's attention that millions of civilians have been murdered by the British government and their foul apologists like anti-Syrian government war propagandists like Fisk.
The biggest sly supporters of the British government's 'kill list' of law abiding civilians everywhere are Cockburn, Segupta and Fisk.
When Patrick Cockburn was rumbled over what he must really be, which is MI6, he did what the British Metropolitan Police did in our 'cases' over their use of corporate legislation against us in 2008, and went running to hide behind far from legal cover... in the British Parliament.
It is not just that people like Fisk point the finger at other governments all the time to try and cover up wars, but they are pointing the finger elsewhere to try and cover up what they are doing in the UK too.
If we look a little closer to home in the UK what we see is that the Independent admitted that I had been unlawfully arrested 40 times while the British government had been dragging us to and fro between police cells and courts trying to smash our law abiding civilian resistance.
It is a matter of record that following my giving that interview to the Independent [that I only did for Brian] one of the hardened criminals recruited by MI5 'Democracy Village' without warning first tried to a) smash a wine bottle over my head, before b) getting through two males to punch me in my jaw, after which the 'police' had no choice but to remove one of theirs [because of witnesses]
Fisk's Independent had covered up that the British Parliament tried to murder me on September 4th 2006, before they tried to murder me again on January 31st 2007, before kidnapping me from inside the court during live proceedings on July 19th 2007 to try and cover up everything that happened from May 23rd 2006 onwards, before trying to murder me again on September 4th 2009...
The really horrid Fisk is covering up what all the 'news' media really did all know was happening on their own doorstep.
While all 'politics' and 'news' media continue to try and make people ‘believe’ that lethal weapons grow on trees, the majority of law abiding civilians know this really is not true.
All lethal weapons flow through the ‘British’ monarchy’s United Nations Security Council weapons supply line of mass disinformation.
... the bogus 'war on terror' over... beach umbrellas
yep... the british death squads really are completely mindless fuckwits who go around taking taxpayers money to steal... beach umbrellas in their bogus 'war on terror'
.... the completely and utterly cojone-free bogus 'war on terror' beach umbrella brigade !!
In the real world where the law abiding majority of civilians live, which is quite different to the never ending fantasy world wish-list of what ‘politics and ‘news’ media would like to make money out of violently doing to law abiding civilians, the issue of administrative governance really is simple.
It is a stand alone truth whoever is saying it, that all law abiding civilians who live by the certainty of the rule of law will admit, that corporate legislation resolutions, sanctions and occupations are mutually exclusive with the certainty of the rule of law.
aaah... the beach umbrella is a not a crime in the bogus 'war on terror'
It is the certainty of the rule of law that makes it pretty much irrelevant whatever moniker any secondary ’politics’ may choose to use, because all administrative governance must first abide by the certainty of the rule of law which no British ‘politics’ or their unelected ‘British’ Queen are currently doing.
It is not the moniker that any ‘politics’ gives itself that is important, but instead the certainty of the rule of law, which identifies whether the administrative state is acting legally or not.
Version 2 of deaths squads on beaches war propaganda, changed from the overt mention of anything British such as British deaths squads patrolling... beach umbrellas
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.
The certainty of the rule of law, that exists for the benefit of everyone, does not change to suit any 'politics' or 'news' media.