'TREATY OF LISBON': UK 'PARLIAMENT' CONTINUE TO TRY & DIVIDE & RULE EUROPE & MIDDLE EAST WITH 'SECTARIAN' BREXIT & PARIS FALSE-FLAG TERROR CANARDS (22.03.2016)
The very unholy trinity of a ‘British’-led ‘axis’ where France and Russia have been their closest collaborators in two World Wars in Europe and carving up the Middle East, still echo everywhere today.
The ‘Treaty of Versailles’ in 1919 that the British ‘Parliament’ cobbled together that the Sharif of Mecca refused to ‘ratify’ [so people could see what happened] slowly unraveled before it completely fell apart with the Iraq War, that also exposed the bogus single lever of corporate ‘war on terror’ legislation that ‘underpins’ all war.
13th december 2007: we won the article 50 'lisbon treaty'... 'exclusion' argument against all the odds, on a date the government chose, that broke up in under two years [for example] the charing cross ‘political’ police ‘cabal’ who were overtly attacking us
Whatever any moniker is used for, cannot disguise the framework of the certainty of the rule of law that all law abiding civilians live by, that identifies what is aggression and self-defence, without ducking and diving all over the place with selective war propaganda for public consumption.
Obviously multi-national corporations only wage war for corporate profit.
21.03.2016: DAILY MAIL: CARSTEN KENGETER SAYS GERMAN “TAKE-OVER” OF LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE IS “GOD’S WILL”
21.03.2016: FX EMPIRE: GERMANS “SPLIT” GOLD BETWEEN FRANKFURT, LONDON & NEW YORK [CLUE: U.S. HAVE ALREADY “LOST” THEIR “SHARE”]
The British ‘Parliament’ who are the world ‘leaders’ in war propaganda and corporate legislation, will first and foremost always try and protect the single lever of corporate legislation upon which the corporate state turns.
There are no corporate wars without the single lever of corporate legislation, because it is that single lever that is used to overstep all administrative boundaries.
[Any Fremantle, and Ian Duncan Smith, the war mongering leader of the Conservative Party at the time they collaborated in the Iraq War married a Fremantle, would know the Rothschild’s for example are the colonial hangers on/bagmen, who move money around to try and duck and dive from any legal battles]
The likes of the Rothschilds [who are no different from the Osama Bin Liner bagman who have both never had any credibility with civilian populations anywhere] 'pioneered'/rely on the single lever of corporate legislation that can be played so many ways to duck and dive wherever.
The Fremantles were originally Lisbon merchants, who could possibly have once been Sephardic Jews in Portugal, because there was 'inmarriage' among Fremantles and Isaacs in the UK too, linking back to the one John Fremantle from Portugal.
... barbara sybil claris nee fremantle
Granny Barbara Sybil Claris nee Fremantle. The Fremantles who are originally Portugese [the wider family is French too] arrived in the UK around the same time the originally German Rothschilds moved to the UK too, in among much colonial European infighting.
In fact both my Granny's parents Sidney and Leila, were actually Fremantles !! [and Isaacs who were also linked by marriage to the original Lisbon merchant John Fremantle]
...my granny [barbara sybil claris nee fremantle] was the daughter of admiral sidney fremantle who started what became gchq etc etc etc... etc
...fremantles...lisbon merchant... there was a lot of 'historical revisionism' going on in 2008
vice admiral thomas fremantle [1765-1819]... there was a lot of colonial infighting going on in europe
...the battle of trafalgar  was the turning point that [after the close call at the battle of waterloo june 18th 1815] led to britain becoming the pre-eminent colonial power for the next century
... my granny barbara's parents sidney and leila were both..fremantles [and isaacs who also went back through marriages to the original john fremantle too]!!
[So it is possible that Fremantles had at one time also been Sephardic Jews when they were in Portugal because Sephardic Jewish people who stayed in Portugal 'converted' to Christianity and also 'inmarried' at a time they and Muslims were both generally being 'expelled' from Portugal]
... fremantles were involved in a lot of... colonialism
... they were involved in colonial wars everywhere
The Rothschilds are the bagmen.
... the rothschilds bagmen 'pioneered' using corporate legislation to 'shift' money around
The not so ‘British’ Queen and Phil the Greek are less ‘British’ than most of us, who are predominantly European.
In all legal terms, the British ‘Parliament’ are legally responsible for much, including the Middle East wars in Palestine, Iraq and Syria that the French and Russian governments have certainly collaborated in, most recently through their ‘misuse’ of the European Court of Human Rights too.
The British Parliament made their military garrison called Israel by ignoring the Mac-Mahon-Sharif Arab Agreement in favour of the European Balfour Declaration with the Zionist Federation, which has only led to military rule.
The shocking war propaganda surrounding false-flag terror attacks on defenceless civilians in Paris in November 2015, disguises that it has only been used to try and retrospectively justify the French government did not have any legal grounds for bombing defenceless civilians in Syria in September 2015.
The French government were trying to piggy back on the British government in Iraq and vice-versa, in Syria, where they always need the Russian government who have a corporate empire stretching from the west coast of Europe to the eastern shores of Asia, to keep their corporate mouths shut at the European Court of Human Rights.
Iraqis are repeatedly saying that the 'Islamic State' is the US/UK.
05.12.2015 NATO’S CAMERON & CORBYN ‘FREE VOTE’ WAR PROPAGANDA TRADUCES CERTAINTY OF RULE OF LAW WITH A CORPORATE POLITICAL ‘LOTTERY’ OVER LIFE
09.09.2015 QUELLE EST LA BASE JURIDIQUE LÉGALE POUR INTERVENIR MILITAIREMENT EN SYRIE PAR FRANCOIS HOLLANDE ET LAURENT FABIUS ?
[There is not going to be any trial over the Paris False-Flag Terror attack in November 2015 because the very obvious NATO ‘intelligence’ asset who was typically recruited as a petty criminal, has apparently pleaded guilty via a prosecutorial ‘slip of the tongue’ that his own celebrity ‘lawyer’ agreed that is what his ‘client’ said.
Of course it should go without saying that there is never any defence to murdering defenceless civilians anywhere]
In all far from legal terms, the British, French and Russian governments have always been trying to gate-keep the long politically stuffed European Court of Human Rights, while basically strong-arming governments in the Middle East.
This is because the European Court of Human Rights have supremacy over the United Nations Security Council weapons supply line, that has no legal mechanisms of any kind itself, and of which the UK, France and Russia are three of the five permanent members.
To suggest that Putin and his coterie of hangers on have any cojones is stretching the certainty of the rule of law.
All far from ‘legal’ roads lead back to the British ‘Parliament’ who currently try and bizarrely hide behind an unelected not so ‘British’ Queen and Phil the Greek, to endlessly wave around ‘sectarian’ canards in the Middle East.
It is the very curious ’Article 50’ add on in the Treaty of Lisbon signed on December 13th 2007 that impossibly seeks to retrospectively re-write the legal reality, that multi-national Europeans are multi-national Europeans are multi-national Europeans, living under the same ‘administrative’ rule of mostly illegitimate corporate legislation.
[On that day, December 13th 2007, we won an incredibly massive and ‘convoluted’ malicious prosecution against us that completely fell apart at Southwark Crown Court that was held on dates the British government chose, that led to the 'break-up' in two years of for example, the Charing Cross Police ‘cabal’ overtly attacking us
...our massive win on december 13th 2007, was over the legal reality, the ‘police’ never could explain why they were trying to ‘disappear’ me on september 4th 2006 [before belgravia and tsg 'police' tortured and tried to murder me on september 4th 2009]
We were not supposed to win on December 13th 2007, but I pulled out a winning High Court legal argument in Willmott v Atack  QB 498 that 'trumped' the Crown Court, from my back pocket, that the Judges very, very churlishly and sarcastically 'thanked' me for 'reminding' them of etc etc.
They couldn't really 'risk' us taking the 'case' [and all it's accompanying dirt] to the High Court using Wilmott v Atack in the circumstances where it was actually such a straightforward matter malicious prosecutions had so obviously been heard the wrong way around etc etc etc.
It was all a very dirty business where two malicious prosecutions had originally been laundered through Westminster Magistrates out of sequence/ the wrong way around, so that everyone could try and cover up, that the 'police' had never had any reason for me being at Charing Cross Police Station in the first place, on September 4th 2006.
We are talking very, very, major, major corruption that was going down.
The two original 'cases' on August 5th 2006 that led to September 4th 2006 that were heard the wrong way around, had spawned numerous other unlawful arrests including on July 9th 2007 [NFA] which was just horrific what was done to us when we left the court, after we won over August 5th 2006 when the CPS had to finally !! admit there had never been any evidence to maliciously charge me.
Of course they had never intended 'charging' me with anything on September 4th 2006 !!
However, when they ended up with Steve too, after they attacked him, when they invited us both into a corridor [they claim had no CCTV] and I managed to run to try and get help [and too many people saw and heard something going on] they had too many 'problems'.
On July 19th 2007, I was then incredibly kidnapped during proceedings at South Western Magistrates over a bogus arrest warrant linked to the 'exclusion' order, where we also won everything, everywhere, although everything kept spawning and being linked to other 'cases' too, so 13th December 2007, was a major victory/breakthrough.
september 4th 2006: ... the 'police' ? ['inspector' wareing was 'transferred' out to hertfordshire]
On September 4th 2006, the monstrous criminal Wareing only managed to get hold of me because I only had a split second to think and realized I wouldn't be able to necessarily safely jump down all the five/six concrete steps the other side of door onto the pavement in the street.
Wareing however nearly sent me flying when I was hanging on to the door for dear life anyway. I had only actually been desperately trying to get enough time to quickly use my phone to call people to say Steve was being attacked, and ask for help.
It was all completely inexplicable what the police had done, 'behind closed doors', so I think they probably intended to try and damage Steve's camera to try and get rid of evidence, and then try and get rid of him.
In the corridor to the right of me, people in no uniforms and police were attacking Steve while to the left of me, just through another door a few feet away [so best bet trying to hide from CCTV] was another person in plain clothes, who apparently called himself Wareing very creepily beckoning with his hands for me to go with him, so I just hoped like hell the door straight in front of me leading to the outside world, that we had come through, was not locked when I smashed the handle down once and it opened and I... ran.
All hell broke loose and luckily Steve managed to yell out to bemused members of the public in the foyer of the police station too for help, so then there was just too much evidence of something very odd going on, so they couldn't just get rid of Steve and keep me.
It was all very, very rotten.
The evidence is the British ‘Parliament’ were ringing their own ‘alarm bells’ all over the place from May 23rd 2006 onwards over the Iraq War and for example corporate 7/7 ’war on terror’ legislation being exposed and ended before a High Court jury]
The only way that the contortions of ‘Article 50’ of the Lisbon Treaty 13th December 2007 could possibly be construed is a ‘get out of jail’ free canard for governments.
At the Nuremberg trials, the U.S. and U.K. along with Russian and French governments were not of course quite the innocents they portrayed themselves to be, while they relied on an ‘accommodation’ with France to avoid jury trials for all, not just the Nazis, the long colonial Genocidal British ‘Parliament’ installed.
It is most certainly not a ‘co-incidence’ that these are the same governments who have ever since been trying to sell everyone Hitler’s ‘sectarian’ canard in the... Middle East wars in Palestine, Iraq and Syria.
It is a matter of fact that the British ‘Parliament’ can only use state violence to illegally try and stop law abiding civilians bringing successful legal challenges in courts of law that would end corporate war.
It is far far easier, for governments to bring legal challenges.
29.08.2014 ISLAMIC STATE PROPAGANDA DESIGNED TO MASK VITOL OIL & TRAFIGURA 'GHOST' TANKERS AT HEART OF LEGAL DISPUTE OVER IRAQI OIL 'SOLD' TO U.S. COMPANIES
23.02.2015 IRANIANS CORNER BRITISH PARLIAMENT IN COURTS, WHILE NEW ZEALAND CHEESE SELLING SURRENDER MONKEYS SELL OUT TO EU TERROR...AGAIN
The black gold of oil isn’t running out anytime soon
26.12.2014 LORD ROTHSCHILD, MURDOCH & CHENEY ‘GENIE ISRAEL’ OIL GRAB IN SYRIAN GOLAN HEIGHTS
21.03.2016 GUARDIAN & FBI HAVE “DISCOVERED” PEOPLE OWN THEIR OWN PERSONAL PROPERTY ?
It has been very difficult to force the repeal of corporate legislation and even more so from the bogus ‘war on terror’ if you are a law abiding civilian, although being a peace campaigner with a High Court Order to try and stop MI6 trying to ‘render’ you, and a lawsuit against MI5 et al can help up to a point.
All the current war propaganda is disgracefully only trying to sell the lie that millions of innocent civilians can be slaughtered in the Middle East, so that the U.K. France and Russia can try and launder their latest ‘Kurdish’ sectarian canard through the European Court of Human Rights.
Most decent and civilized people are quite sure the Iraq War and War on Syria did not slaughter millions upon millions of civilians so a few opportunistic Kurdish political leaders could benefit.
Of course all the legal and all other realities mean there isn’t anyone apart from U.K. [France and Russia] propagandists spinning [who know exactly what they are doing] trying to sell any sectarian canard.
The entire spectrum of self-aggrandizing mainstream and not at all alternative ‘news’ media spin from the United Nations Security Council divide and rule disinformation is like a very, very bad soap opera really.
In 2016, the still colonial British weapons supply line has run out of corporate war propaganda, any which way anyone could possibly look at anything.
... this 19th february 19th 2016 lawless madness from cameron & co, over political 'policy' does not fly
The less the corporate state uses any ‘weapons’ against defenceless civilians, the better life really is for all law abiding civilians everywhere.
The only way it is really possible to ultimately stop the corporate state either stealing or printing money out of thin air, that is simply added to the fraud of ‘sovereign debt’ etc is by repealing the single lever of corporate legislation.
It is the single lever of corporate legislation that can be played so many different ways, that means so many stay so silent to collect their 'percentage'.
The very shocking legal reality however is the certainty of the rule of law and corporate legislation/'sanctions' are mutually exclusive so where one exists the other cannot.
Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.
The certainty of the rule of law, that exists for the benefit of everyone, does not change to suit any 'politics' or 'news' media.