27/9/2018: Sorry website has been offline the past week. We were hacked by Government Agents !!

UNWARRANTED: UK [& FRANCE] SUSPEND RULE OF LAW OVER ‘SURVEILLANCE’ TO TRY & SECURE LUCRATIVE MONOPOLIES OVER INFORMATION FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES (22.11.2015)

The UK and French governments have by no co-incidence both suspended the rule of law over 'surveillance' in the past week, through different means, in their never ending quests to try and secure lucrative monopolies over information for commercial purposes.

The British government suspended the rule of law over 'surveillance', by claiming the Court of Appeal needed ‘advice’ from the ECHR, while France played catch-up by suspending the rule of law over 'surveillance', using the pretext of the Paris terror attacks.

...it is notable that roland dumas publicly stated the british government were behind overthrowing the syrian government [when sarkozy was still in power, before hollande & co jumped on board]

 

The purpose of both is to try and propel civilians straight into the ECHR, rather than (for example) High Court juries in civil claims, in Britain. 

 

16.06.2013 SYRIA: FAO: ATTORNEY GENERAL, FOREIGN SECRETARY, HOME SECRETARY, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE


It is a statement of truth that it is no co-incidence the British stage managed proceedings [below] involve conflicts of interest from [for example] Jessica Simor who represents Westminster Council in my outstanding High Court civil counterclaim in HQ11X00563, over illegal undercover operations.

 

...this 'judicial review' over hypothetical 'surveillance' is about trying to cover up my high court jury civil counterclaim in HQ11X00563, over the facts of an unprecedented undercover operation

 

SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT v DAVIS MP & ORS [2015] EWCA CIV 1185 (20 NOVEMBER 2015)

 

DAVIS & ORS, R (ON THE APPLICATION OF) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT & ORS [2015] EWHC 2092 (ADMIN)(17JULY 2015)

 

Davis and Watson are well known war mongers who waltzed straight into a court to pretend all political shades were challenging legislation over 'surveillance', when the facts show all 'political' shades were only trying to buy time.

 

The Court of Appeal had to ask if anyone wanted ‘interim relief’ from state surveillance, that anyone should have access to any court to have.

 

In fact it is simple to reduce the cacophony of surveillance propaganda down to a simple refusal to share information, that can be put in writing if necessary.

 

It is the illegal use of S17(1)e PACE Act 1984 on law abiding civilians, for overt and covert ‘surveillance’, because the British government could not get warrants in pre-planned operations, that definitively proves state spying is done for the purely commercial purposes of corporate profit.

 

When all their legislative smoke and mirrors failed, the true facts are the British government have been illegally using S17(1)e PACE Act 1984 to illegally spy on law abiding civilians.

 

It is commonsense that no responsible government would suspend, the rule of law over anything, including state surveillance.

 

19.11.2015 THE TYRANNY OF ‘DEMOCRACY’: NO CIRCUMSTANCES WARRANT FRENCH ’LEGISLATION’ TO SUSPEND RULE OF LAW

 

22.11.2015 GUARDIAN: BRITAIN TO BOOST 'COUNTER-TERROR' SPENDING 30% TO £15.1 BILLION

 

There is no greater need for the rule of law than in times of war, [so that legal facts can be separated from lawless fictions that lead to massive corporate financial windfalls].

We are ‘known’ by the entire British Parliament et al because we are law abiding civilians, with no prior 'legal training' whatsoever, who unusually forced the repeal of corporate legislation in their bogus war on terror, against extraordinary odds, in a relatively short time.

Challenging corporate legislation does not involve self-aggrandisement with nonsense like ‘civil disobedience’ which is just another form of controlled opposition.

Sadly all modern corporate states ruled over by the uncivilised UNSC weapons supply line care about is corporate war profiteering in all it’s many forms, so our legal challenges over corporate war legislation, propelled us to the top of their ‘hit list’.

What we ‘discovered’ ourselves was the British government (working with ahem the two-faced  Russian government who dishonestly claim 'Democracy Village founder' Mark Raddie is an 'anti-war activist') using S17(1)e PACE Act 1984 to conduct illegal overt and covert surveillance.

Overt and covert surveillance under s17(1)e PACE Act culminated in an undercover operation called ‘Democracy Village’.

 

The British government publicly using a lawless undercover operation the size of 'Democracy Village' against law abiding civilians, for all manner of means, including to try and 'join' us in very far from legal proceedings, exposed the scale of lawless 'surveillance'.

The 'surveillance' argument was not actually a legal argument we went looking to have, that we were nevertheless dragged into, that has very, very wide implications.

 

The continuing involvement of the Russian government with an organizer of 'Democracy Village' cannot simply be ascribed to 'appeasement'.

 

...the underlying problem with the un is that countries sign up to being ruled over by the unsc weapons supply line, rather than the rule of law

 

Our civil claims against illegal state surveillance that included the likes of ‘Democracy Village’ resulted in the British government ordering ‘police’ to try and cover up the true identities of those involved using (for example) the ridiculously labelled 666 on April 10th 2013 when we went to the British High Court.

 

...the british government have no recognised defence in law to ordering police to try and disguise their identities when they go after law abiding civilians because they go to...court


On May 25th 2010, at a 'State Opening' the BBC had illegally edited audio they published without any right of reply, to try and disguise the identity and use of an undercover agent from ‘Democracy Village’ as a 'complainant' in my unlawful arrest.

 

the evidence is the bbc et al sought to cover up the identity and involvement of the 'democracy village' agent [pictured centre with hat] who was the 'complainant' behind my unlawful arrest under the pretext of s5 Public Order Act 1986] on may 25th 2010

 

In fact the BBC did not even mention that a complainant from 'Democracy Village' connived with the police over my unlawful arrest under Section 5 Public Order Act 1986.

 

the bbc illegally edited and published audio of my unlawful arrest, so that it did not show it was made under s 5 Public Order Act 1986, using the unidentified 'complainant' [pictured above] from 'democracy village'

 

The BBC made a big noise illegally running with that edited audio.

 

Various ‘news’ media including the Barclay Brothers Telegraph ‘journalist’ Bryony Gordon subsequently sought to hide behind her alleged ‘mental health issues’ to try and disguise their illegal attempts to have a trial by media over the undercover operation called ‘Democracy Village’.

 

Obviously the Mayor of London et al would have looked more than slightly stupid in bringing their legal proceedings against us that began on May 26th 2010, if the BBC had told the truth about the involvement of 'Democracy Village' in my unlawful arrest on May 25th 2010.

The Mayor of London and City of London recently stashed everything they had stolen from our campaign in the Museum of London in what are part of continuing and repeated attempts to re-invent our Parliament Square Peace Campaign in the image of the British state.

The ‘world’ according to the corporate state and 'news' media is a lawless fiction invented for simple minds.

If some people want their information controlled by the government and news media then that is their choice, that they can opt into, but cannot violently impose on other law abiding civilians.

 

TO REPEAT:

It is the illegal use of S17(1)e PACE Act 1984 on law abiding civilians, through overt and covert ‘surveillance’, because the British government could not get warrants in pre-planned operations, that definitively proves state spying is done for the purely commercial purposes of corporate profit.

It is commonsense that law abiding civilians bringing successful legal challenges for the benefit of everyone, in courts of law, over corporate revenue raising legislation, affects the whole badge and label brigade of corporate war profiteers more than anything else.

It is stating the obvious that corporations should not be able to use government to buy legislation that makes them money.

 

The phoney Telegraph expenses scandal disguised that corporations like Vitol Oil are paying to put their bagmen like Alan Duncan in Parliament, to make them money through legislation etc.

 

The phoney expenses scandal did not expose that I was falsely imprisoned without legal representation or trial, because (for example) Vitol Oil's bagman Alan Duncan had not at the time of my false imprisonment, disclosed (for example) the £160,000 'expenses' he received from Vitol Oil.

 

It is public knowledge that Vitol Oil (for example) worked with MI6 to overthrow Gaddafi, and so on and so forth.

 

The real 'scandal' is most members of both houses of the British Parliament are installed by corporate interests to buy corporate legislation.

 

The only way the British government have ever waged war is by illegally using state violence on law abiding civilians to try and prevent successful legal challenges in...courts of law.

 

Please note: Our long-standing civilian resistance that began on June 2nd 2001 is not a 'news' media outlet. We only publish information to help save civilian lives.

 

 

27/9/2018: Sorry website has been offline the past week. We were hacked by Government Agents !!